FAA Lightning
Author
Discussion

MartG

Original Poster:

22,755 posts

233 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
Someone just posted these pics on facebook, from a sales pamphlet.

I thought it was hard enough flying them into an airfield, never mind onto a carrier !


















aeropilot

40,530 posts

256 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
MartG said:
I thought it was hard enough flying them into an airfield, never mind onto a carrier
Yes, but you'll notice that it's radicallt different in configuration to what was a 'normal' Lightning - not the swing wing design wink

Was a BAC proposal to prevent the FAA order for the Phantom IIRC.


Hooli

32,278 posts

229 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
The pointy nose one reminds me of something, can't think what though.

The Hypno-Toad

13,298 posts

234 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
Fiat G91?
Interesting stuff.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

290 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
Looks like a worthwhile improvement even for a land based Lightning.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
I'm wondering how the undercarriage arrangement could have withstood carrier landings.

Or, to be more precise, the wing structure to which the undercarriage was attached.

Spyder5

1,071 posts

194 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
I suspect that if the landing were possible, the aircraft carrier couldn't carry enough spare parts!

perdu

4,885 posts

228 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
If that abor...

( I got carried away here, best stricken from the record chaps)
wink


Naval Lightning, very mediocre flights of fancy

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
The brochure has a very "cobbled together" look to it. Their Lordships at the Admiralty must have chuckled when it dropped on their doormat.

FourWheelDrift

92,237 posts

313 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
Someone has had a go at building one.






I suppose with the swing wing the section of wing the undercarriage is fixed to would be naturally stronger (looks like the modeller has used Buccaneer undercarriage) but it looks ungainly overweight and adding weight to a Lightning that already has a short range would have made it shorter still.

essayer

10,410 posts

223 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
I hoped the thread title meant the FAA had licenced a Lightning to fly frown

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
The model looks good - but it also shows that the aircraft looks a bit of a mess. I reckon it was just a spoiling tactic rather than anything meaningful - especially as Lord Mountbatten had worked hard to undermine TSR2.

perdu

4,885 posts

228 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
No

Even as a model, (and I love a nice model) it does nothing for me

Abortion, there I did say it...

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
I wouldn't think it would be an easy thing to do with the Lightning. The Phantom was designed from the outset as a carrier borne fighter/bomber. It's wing was designed from the very beginning to accept the heavy loads experienced on a carrier landing.

The Lightning was designed as a land based point interceptor so it would have need a pretty much completely redesigned wing, wing spar and undercarriage assembly.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
perdu said:
No

Even as a model, (and I love a nice model) it does nothing for me

Abortion, there I did say it...
I wasn't saying it was pretty - just that the modeller had done a good job in interpreting the brochure images in 3D.

It's a pretty ugly looking brute of a thing.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

290 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
True, there are a few military aircraft designed for carrier use that turned into world class land based fighters. Can't think of any the other way about except maybe the Harrier as a slightly special case. Mind you, I'm sure a couple of people here can think of other examples.

Corsair
Phantom
Buccaneer
F18 (Admittedly descended from the YF17).
Arguably F14.

Vs

Hurricane had it's moments.
B25 had it's moment.


Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
The Seafire performed OK but it still had undesirable characteristics for a ship borne aircraft.

In the more modern era, we had an attempt at a ship based Jaguar and a ship based version of the F-111. Neither entered service.
When McDonell Douglas got the rights to redesign the Hawk into a naval training aircraft the whole aeroplane ended up being almost completely redesigned from scratch.

In m y opinion, the best example of a conventional land based aircraft converting to a carrier borne role is the Dassault Rafale.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
The Russians have messed about with nautical versions of the MiG 29 and Sukhoi Su 27-30. As far as I am aware, none have been properly deployed operationally yet.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
I wasn't aware that the Russians had a fully operation large carrier in service. I thought they had sold the only one they had.

The MiG 29 first flew in 1977 - so they've finally managed to get a naval version after 37 years.

And of course, in the modern era, it SHOULD be possible to design an aircraft from the outset that is usable off land or off a ship. It's just that previous attempts to do this have not been massively successful - or have proved much more difficult to achieve.

Obviously, if you through enough money at a project, you will get the outcome you want.

oj113

182 posts

233 months

Thursday 22nd May 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I wasn't aware that the Russians had a fully operation large carrier in service. I thought they had sold the only one they had.
The Admiral Kuznetzov is currently in service, in fact I believe she recently transited the English Channel. She carries SU-33's. It was her sister hull that got sold in a very roundabout way to China.