Would this work? (getting right exposure for film)
Would this work? (getting right exposure for film)
Author
Discussion

ambuletz

Original Poster:

11,583 posts

205 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
Say you're inexperienced with working out the right exposure for a shot, and such, aren't confident when using a film camera.

Would it work to say.. Use any digital camera to take the shot, check you're happy with how its exposed, then use those settings to take the same shot on a film camera?

Say I were to take a portrait shot of someone using my fuji x20. I see the settings are (hypothetically) F2.8, 1/100th, ISO100. Would you then be able to use same settings on a film SLR to get the same (or as close) shot as you did using a digital camera?

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

285 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
Yes, no problem.

Simpo Two

91,567 posts

289 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
I wouldn't trust it.

Pretty much all SLRs built from the 1970s have either a light meter in them or a choice of automatic exposure modes, just like DSLRs. I'd rather use the readings from the camera I'm using than one from an unrelated camera which I have to cart around as an expensive lightmeter. Cumbersome, slow and no more guaranteed to be accurate is my hunch.

MysteryLemon

4,968 posts

215 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
You could and it would be somewhat accurate but never going to be 100%.

As said, pretty much all film SLRs have light meters much like digital DSLRs do. It will tell you if you are overexposing or underexposing the scene much like a digital SLR will. Just adjust the compensation for the scene based on what the meter is telling you.

budfox

1,510 posts

153 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
Google the Sunny 16 rule.

djsmith74

469 posts

174 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
When I'm out shooting with my film camera, I use the excellent myLightMeter app on my iPhone. It's surprisingly accurate for what it is, and I haven't had any exposure issues since using it. And when the battery goes flat I revert to the Sunny16 rule!. Having decent film (I shoot with Kodak Tri-X and Portra) does help as they offer a surprisingly large amount of latitude, especially if you're scanning the negatives and doing post-processing digitally.

djsmith74

469 posts

174 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
When I'm out shooting with my film camera, I use the excellent myLightMeter app on my iPhone. It's surprisingly accurate for what it is, and I haven't had any exposure issues since using it. And when the battery goes flat I revert to the Sunny16 rule!. Having decent film (I shoot with Kodak Tri-X and Portra) does help as they offer a surprisingly large amount of latitude, especially if you're scanning the negatives and doing post-processing digitally.

davepoth

29,395 posts

223 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
If you're doing a portrait, you can bracket the exposure anyway. You may find that the film works quite nicely being under- or over-exposed.

chris.mapey

4,778 posts

291 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
If you are unsure, add a little bit when shooting film, as a shot that's overexposed will be a 'thicker' negative which is easier to print a decent print from (or get a scan from) than a 'thin' (underexposed) one

Simpo Two

91,567 posts

289 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
chris.mapey said:
If you are unsure, add a little bit when shooting film, as a shot that's overexposed will be a 'thicker' negative which is easier to print a decent print from (or get a scan from) than a 'thin' (underexposed) one
I know someone who worked in a film processing lab, and when she got a DSLR she really struggled to comprehend that 'overexposed' was now lighter and not darker... spin

markmullen

15,877 posts

258 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
If you're shooting portraits why not get a lightmeter if you don't trust the one in the camera, they're a useful thing to own anyway.