being totally pedantic, but would be funny if....
Discussion
towman said:
Am I the only one who has more than one car, all of which are kept off the highway, with only one potential driver? Of course I`m not. So why do we have to pay RFL for all three?
Disc should be transferrable, with stiff penalties for having a car on the road withour one.
Government takes less money, ergo never happen.
rsvmilly said:
You would only be able to claim your RFL back in whole-months so it wouldn't be too economical in the long run. ![]()
I knew a Jewish fella who was trying to negotiate a discount with his insurers on the basis that he didn't use his car one day out of seven (the Sabbath).
If thats a sunday he should get a 90% discount! All the
wits are out then and I try to avoid driving on a sunday whereever possible. Both my "pull out in front of my bike" accidents happened on a sunday

towman said:From the Government's POV this is a good reason NOT to put all RFL duty on petrol.
Am I the only one who has more than one car, all of which are kept off the highway, with only one potential driver? Of course I`m not. So why do we have to pay RFL for all three?
Disc should be transferrable, with stiff penalties for having a car on the road withour one.
towman said:
Am I the only one who has more than one car, all of which are kept off the highway, with only one potential driver? Of course I`m not. So why do we have to pay RFL for all three?
Disc should be transferrable, with stiff penalties for having a car on the road withour one.
Ditto. The government surely know this.
I too have considered getting a SORN now and then, instead of letting the disc "go to waste", but obviously the red tape is a lot of hassle (probably made difficult intentionally in the way that the public sector does best).
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


