Any welding/metal experts here?
Any welding/metal experts here?
Author
Discussion

Lawbags

Original Poster:

1,074 posts

157 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
What might cause cracks like these? This is one of numerous cracks that keeps appearing on my custom mani....




Sensibleboy

1,168 posts

154 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Too much engine movement on standard mounts stressing the manifold?

Lawbags

Original Poster:

1,074 posts

157 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Sensibleboy said:
Too much engine movement on standard mounts stressing the manifold?
I'm not discounting that, but the mounts are filled, so engine movement is minimal.

TheRealFingers99

1,996 posts

157 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Probably is stress. My guess is that the stock headers (or the stock system) had some form of support further down the manifold/downpipe and that now the manifold effectively supports everything down to the first flexi joint. A fair bit of weight plus you've got to factor in expansion/contraction, any movement on the mounts, and so on.

The job itself looks fine. For all that, it's not an exact science -- you might take them back, see what is said/done.

Edited by TheRealFingers99 on Thursday 3rd July 07:30

Mave

8,217 posts

244 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Do you know what grade stainless it is? My first guess would be fatigue, but I've seen something on a 304 heat exchanger where the wrong filler wire was used.

Mave

8,217 posts

244 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
I agree, but what initiated the crack in the first place- weld strike / inclusion, high stress, or low material properties? Be interesting to see the failure surface...

Mave

8,217 posts

244 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
doogz said:
Wait, sorry, I was looking at the pictures on a tiny screen, does that come off the weld onto where the fillet joins the parent material, and run all the way around?!
Ha ha, are you looking at the lack of penetration?

Major Fallout

5,278 posts

260 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
My money would be on thermal expansion, it looks like the manifold plate is made of steel and pipes are made of stainless steel. Causing stress fractures where the two metals meet.

SEE YA

3,522 posts

274 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Sensibleboy said:
Too much engine movement on standard mounts stressing the manifold?
Also how thick is the pipe, itself too thin and with heat it will flex and break at the welds.



Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

284 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
SEE YA said:
Also how thick is the pipe, itself too thin and with heat it will flex and break at the welds.
yes I''l bet it's quite a bit thinner than an OEM tubular manifold would be.

However if the manifold is not attached to the bottom of the engine somewhere then movement could certainly be assisting the process.

velocemitch

4,019 posts

249 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Looks like the upper part of the fillet hasn't penetrated where as the lower part has. The crack seems to start at just that point. You can see a small vertical part on the upper weld, no more tha half a mm, where as the lower part the fillet blends nicely into the parent metal.

Isn't necessarily the actual cause of the problem, just the weakest part which will have failed due to the stress applied. We don't know if that stress would have cracked a perfect weld anyway.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

227 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
velocemitch said:
Looks like the upper part of the fillet hasn't penetrated where as the lower part has. The crack seems to start at just that point. You can see a small vertical part on the upper weld, no more tha half a mm, where as the lower part the fillet blends nicely into the parent metal.
Yeah agree with that. The others in the picture all look fine, but the top of that weld hasn't penetrated at all for some reason.

buggalugs

9,282 posts

266 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Being fairly ignorant on such matters, I would have thought the thin pipe would have penetrated and the dirty great thick flange not, rather than the other way around.

vrooom

3,763 posts

296 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Thickness of steel plate and pipes are different, so thermal can vary leading them to crack.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

227 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
doogz said:
buggalugs said:
Being fairly ignorant on such matters, I would have thought the thin pipe would have penetrated and the dirty great thick flange not, rather than the other way around.
If it's a mild flange, stainless CHS, and they used the wrong filler wire, not necessarily.
It is a bit odd though, given that all the rest look fine. Dirty surface maybe?

BGarside

1,568 posts

166 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Unless it was stress-relieved by post-weld heat-treatment, the region adjacent to the weld toe is already stressed in tension resulting from post-solidification thermal contraction of the weld metal.

Add a little cyclic stress (engine /exhaust vibrations) to this existing tensile stress and fatigue is a distinct possibility, given that the transition from the weld to the pipe surface, and the roughness of the weld surface itself, both act as stress-raisers.

Of course, it could be that that particular weld contains a defect, such as porosity, lack of penetration/lack of fusion or slag inclusions, but it would probably be necessary to break open the crack and inspect the surfaces to see if that is the case. If exhaust gases have been leaking through the crack these may have damaged evidence of any pre-existing defect/s.

If you have a recurring cracking issue affecting only one pipe and not the others I guess it raises questions about the constraints / degrees of freedom of that particular pipe as the engine moves and as the pipe thermally expands and contracts, as it suggests the stresses are higher in that pipe than the others.

Lawbags

Original Poster:

1,074 posts

157 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
I typed a reply earlier but it didn't post for some reason.

Anyway, the tubular pipe is 1mm thick but I couldn't tell you the grade. I'm told that it's low grade, which is shown by how dull it has gone. I'm no expert on this, so this may be false.

I had runner 4 crack in exactly the same place previously, which was sorted when I took it back for assorted other issues (including other cracks)

Also, the guy who made the mani did make a bracket to support the weight of the turbo. By welding directly onto the compressor housing (but that's another issue entirely). But then one of the welds broke on that too.



Long and short of it....anyone know of a DECENT manifold fabricator in the South? I'm trying to get my money back from this guy so will need a proper one making.



Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

284 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Would probably have helped if you'd mentioned you had a turbo hanging off it...

1mm is nothing like thick enough for this application, and you certainly need additional supports for the turbo. The cheap Chinese made turbo manifolds you see on eBay crack like this for a passtime.

TheRealFingers99

1,996 posts

157 months

Thursday 3rd July 2014
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Would probably have helped if you'd mentioned you had a turbo hanging off it...

1mm is nothing like thick enough for this application, and you certainly need additional supports for the turbo. The cheap Chinese made turbo manifolds you see on eBay crack like this for a passtime.
Yes.

That looks like someone has used a n/a performance mani design as a basis for a turbo manifold. It just won't work properly.

Issues are:

  • Thickness of tube. For strength and heat retention, you want as thick as you can reasonably go. The cheapest way to do turbo headers is to use what the Americans call Weld-Els. These are pre-bent short sections of pipe (you can get straight sections, too) used by steam engineers and gas engineers. Go for at least schedule 30, 40 would be better. Available in stainless or mild steel. This'll be 3 or 4 times thicker than what you've got. The flange also needs to be something like 1/2" thick. The higher spec the material, the thinner you can go, but 1mm simply isn't enough.
You'll sometimes see n/a headers glowing a dull red. It's not uncommon to see turbo headers orange or even yellow. A huge difference in temperatures.

Another cut price solution, assuming the car once had a cast iron manifold, is a cut and shut job to mount a turbo flange on the end. This involves dissimilar welding (something which any welder/fabricator will try to avoid) but can be effective.

  • Length of tube. N/A engines rely on exhaust scavenging. Whether you actually get any useful scavenging with a turbo engine is open to debate. Consequently, n/a manifolds will have (or should have!) a carefully calculated length. Turbos are not so fussy, so most folk go for something like 15". This makes for a tougher fitment, and often for an easier/better route for the turbo oil return.
  • Hanging the turbo. Ideally, the turbo wants to be hung off a tripod type fitting, so that the weight is supported at all times, but movement for expansion/contraction is allowed.
For fabricators, you could try looking at people outside of the "performance car" world. Don't know anyone in your part of the multiverse.

Lots of good stuff in the "Street Turbocharging" book by Mark Warner, or A Graham Bell's "Forced Induction" book -- maybe the Corky Bell book, too, although I've not got round to reading it.

Lawbags

Original Poster:

1,074 posts

157 months

Friday 4th July 2014
quotequote all
Some interesting points there. Cheers.

If it makes any difference, here's the full mani....