Pocket camera
Author
Discussion

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,390 posts

250 months

Saturday 12th July 2014
quotequote all
I'm after a camera that I can carry around with me at all times, so it's size is key. I don't want to use the camera on my phone, as that's awful.

My research so far has lead me to the Canon S110 and a used Fuji XF1, reviews have said that the S120 is the best in class, but I don't really want to spend too much more than in the region of £150, so that's ruled out.

Are these two as good as I can get for this sort of range? It's main use if for snapping when I don't have any of the larger cameras with me, so a true point and shoot.

GetCarter

30,855 posts

303 months

Saturday 12th July 2014
quotequote all
theboyfold said:
I'm after a camera that I can carry around with me at all times, so it's size is key. I don't want to use the camera on my phone, as that's awful.

My research so far has lead me to the Canon S110 and a used Fuji XF1, reviews have said that the S120 is the best in class, but I don't really want to spend too much more than in the region of £150, so that's ruled out.

Are these two as good as I can get for this sort of range? It's main use if for snapping when I don't have any of the larger cameras with me, so a true point and shoot.
You won't go wrong with the S110. Tiny and consistently good results.

DavidY

4,492 posts

308 months

Saturday 12th July 2014
quotequote all
You can get a new xf1 for under £130 (Currys)

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,390 posts

250 months

Saturday 12th July 2014
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
You won't go wrong with the S110. Tiny and consistently good results.
I thought you would agree with that choice, I seem to remember you saying how good they were. What's the performance like in low-light and with a flash? Have you used it much in those sort of situations?

GetCarter

30,855 posts

303 months

Saturday 12th July 2014
quotequote all
theboyfold said:
I thought you would agree with that choice, I seem to remember you saying how good they were. What's the performance like in low-light and with a flash? Have you used it much in those sort of situations?
I have the s95, so an older version. Flash 'reach' isn't that brilliant, but low light is pretty good. Loads of reviews out there.

RX100 is MILES better, but twice the weight, size, and more money.

..but s110 is smaller and proper pocket size.

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,390 posts

250 months

Saturday 12th July 2014
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
I have the s95, so an older version. Flash 'reach' isn't that brilliant, but low light is pretty good. Loads of reviews out there.

RX100 is MILES better, but twice the weight, size, and more money.

..but s110 is smaller and proper pocket size.
Thanks, I've just been reading about it on DPReview and form factor is important here as I want to be able to actually have it with me on a night out for example. So I think the Canon could be the answer.

GetCarter

30,855 posts

303 months

Saturday 12th July 2014
quotequote all
theboyfold said:
GetCarter said:
I have the s95, so an older version. Flash 'reach' isn't that brilliant, but low light is pretty good. Loads of reviews out there.

RX100 is MILES better, but twice the weight, size, and more money.

..but s110 is smaller and proper pocket size.
Thanks, I've just been reading about it on DPReview and form factor is important here as I want to be able to actually have it with me on a night out for example. So I think the Canon could be the answer.
For a jeans pocket, it's the Canon every time. (Not going into the lump in the pocket with the Sony). !

boxsternoob56

223 posts

165 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
I have the S120 and it really is small enough for a jeans pocket...

£289 at present but

http://www.camerapricebuster.co.uk/Canon/Canon-Pow...

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,390 posts

250 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
It's the S110 that I am looking at, which is £160

http://www.digitalrev.com/product/canon-powershot-...

the-photographer

4,476 posts

200 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Panasonic LF1



Simpo Two

91,559 posts

289 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Meh, Lumix XS3:


the-photographer

4,476 posts

200 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Wow, didnt know about that one, nearly iPhone thin,

Simpo Two

91,559 posts

289 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
I got my XS3 a couple of weeks ago, and for the size and price (£60) it's hard to fault. Probably not as good IQ-wise as the ones mentioned above but if you want thin, it has thin!

This is a rather quirky site but I found it very useful when trying to compare the multitude of compacts all with conflicting semi-meaningful bulletpoints: http://snapsort.com/

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,390 posts

250 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Meh, Lumix XS3:

That's tiny, it's also very cheap. However, the reviews seem to be mixed and they suggest a lot of noise even at low ISO

Simpo Two

91,559 posts

289 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
theboyfold said:
That's tiny, it's also very cheap. However, the reviews seem to be mixed and they suggest a lot of noise even at low ISO
Furry nuff: http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-Powershot-S110-v...

But the bigger it is and the more you pay, the better it will probably be, so you just have to decide where on the ladder to stop.