Lookalikes of superior models, always terrible and naff?
Lookalikes of superior models, always terrible and naff?
Author
Discussion

Tuvra

Original Poster:

7,926 posts

254 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
I was just wondering what the general opinion is in regards to converting cars to look like a superior or newer, face-lifted models?

The cars I have in mind are the Bentley GT's with Supersports conversions, I love the thought of a Bentley but at 27 they seem a bit "old man" for me unless they are in Supersport guise which are currently out of my "next car" budget:

Versus

I am talking about cars like this black car or this grey one.

Would insuring something like this be a bit of a nightmare also?

I would not badge it as a Supersport BTW biggrin

Triumph Man

9,586 posts

197 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
You see a lot of BMW M3 and M5 alikes, and I can't help thinking they look naff. I'd much prefer the 328i/530d that they seem to be based on to be standard. But hey, that's my opinion.

crostonian

2,427 posts

201 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
Not necessarily naff but there is a bit of the fake Rolex about it, I also always (wrongly I know) assume they're a CAT D, the trade doesn't like them either so prepare for a kicking come trade in time.

ewenm

28,506 posts

274 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
If the owner likes them, why does it matter? Plenty of people with M-Sport/S-Line/etc trim on their cars. Badging a car up as a different model is a bit weird IMO, but some people like it I guess.

joebongo

1,517 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
Pug TT?

PanzerCommander

5,026 posts

247 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
As long as it is not badged as a Supersport then I don't see the issue at all. I don’t see the stock Continental GT as an old mans car either (I’m 30 btw) its actually rather nice.

There are a fair few Mustangs running around with the Shelby body components fitted and as long as they are not badged as a Shelby/GT500 then there is no issue some are supercharged some remain N/A (in fact a 2007 GT with a supercharger will outperform a GT500).

At the end of the day you are not thinking about trying to pass off a Toyota as a Ferrari.

I can't help but think the Supersport body components for a Continental GT would put the price of the car you want into silly levels though as you'd want them bought and fitted by a Bentley dealer just in case you ever wanted to sell it.

kambites

71,469 posts

250 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
ewenm said:
If the owner likes them, why does it matter?
yes

Personally I find them a bit sad, but if you like it why care what anyone else thinks?

Tuvra

Original Poster:

7,926 posts

254 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
PanzerCommander said:
As long as it is not badged as a Supersport then I don't see the issue at all. I don’t see the stock Continental GT as an old mans car either (I’m 30 btw) its actually rather nice.

There are a fair few Mustangs running around with the Shelby body components fitted and as long as they are not badged as a Shelby/GT500 then there is no issue some are supercharged some remain N/A (in fact a 2007 GT with a supercharger will outperform a GT500).

At the end of the day you are not thinking about trying to pass off a Toyota as a Ferrari.

I can't help but think the Supersport body components for a Continental GT would put the price of the car you want into silly levels though as you'd want them bought and fitted by a Bentley dealer just in case you ever wanted to sell it.
I don't think you can fit a standard SS kit on to an original GT, I believe the SS is slightly wider and therefore the kit has to be an after-market "replica" kit boxedin