Underpowered cars
Author
Discussion

Vyse

Original Poster:

1,224 posts

154 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Which cars do you consider to be underpowered when you compare the engine that they have with the size of car its in. Or in other words, cars which are underpowered for the type of car they are e.g. family hatch or people carrier.

Also another category, cars which are underpowered compared to other cars in the same class. e.g. Aston Martin(all of them) in the super car class.

Northernchimp

1,282 posts

162 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
In 2014 you can buy a brand new Polo with a 1.0 60HP engine that takes over 15 seconds to hit 60. You would have to be pretty desperate to own one, likewise the BMW 114. Pointless.

750turbo

6,164 posts

254 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Northernchimp said:
In 2014 you can buy a brand new Polo with a 1.0 60HP engine that takes over 15 seconds to hit 60. You would have to be pretty desperate to own one, likewise the BMW 114. Pointless.
Drivel - These cars are perfectly suitable for some people. (Although these people may not reside in here...)

Mr E

23,066 posts

289 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
750turbo said:
Drivel - These cars are perfectly suitable for some people. (Although these people may not reside in here...)
Indeed. Underpowered are knackered old campers that can't keep up with heavies in lane one.

A one litre polo is just a bit slow.

SV8Predator

2,102 posts

195 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Vyse said:
cars which are underpowered compared to other cars in the same class. e.g. Aston Martin(all of them) in the super car class.
OK, I'll feed the troll:

I'll listen to your argument when you explain to us, from your own person experience, which Aston models are underpowered (compared to others in your "supercar" class.

We're keen to learn your views. So tell us! Which Aston (that you've driven), feels underpowered to another "supercar" that you've driven?



Dave Hedgehog

16,337 posts

234 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Anything under 200bhp/tonne smile

MC Bodge

29,743 posts

205 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all

My wife has a 1.2 Fabia with 60-odd bhp. It's not fast, but it is fine.

Northernchimp said:
likewise the BMW 114. Pointless.
Anybody who can't manage a small-ish car with 'only' 101bhp shouldn't be allowed to drive on the roads.

Northernchimp

1,282 posts

162 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
OK for granny Gribble's trip to Asda I suppose.

Baryonyx

18,283 posts

189 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
The old 1.3CDTi Astra was dreadful. Barely strong enough to drag itself along with one passenger, never mind a full compliment and a bootful! It was also a complete disaster to drive, with a laggy throttle and awful gearing which produced yawning chasms in the 'power'. Grim stuff.

DJP

1,201 posts

209 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
I once drove a 1.6 Mondeo. It was dreadful. Back in January our local Ford dealer was punting them out for £12k brand spankers.

Still not enough engine for the size of car.

DJP

1,201 posts

209 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
...

TREMAiNE

4,164 posts

179 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
I'd say the RX-8 is an underpowered car, seeing as its a RWD Sports Car. Having said that, 231bhp from a NA 1.3 is mighty impressive.

woody2846

1,369 posts

180 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Subaru Impreza 1.5!!! Bloody awful

Motorrad

6,811 posts

217 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
bks about this 'you can't drive' st.

Come off the Grange roundabout at full throttle in a modern 1.2 Corsa and try to make it up Lindale Hill without slowing to fully laden HGV pace. I found it frankly disturbing that a modern car couldn't maintain over 60mph given appropriate use of the throttle and gears. The fker is too heavy for the engine.

MC Bodge

29,743 posts

205 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
The old 1.3CDTi Astra was dreadful. Barely strong enough to drag itself along with one passenger, never mind a full compliment and a bootful! It was also a complete disaster to drive, with a laggy throttle and awful gearing which produced yawning chasms in the 'power'. Grim stuff.
Indeed. Good response, a useful torque curve and suitable gearing can make a big difference. It's not about the peak power.

The rental car spec Insignia 1.8 petrol was also fairly rubbish in day-to-day driving, but claimed 140bhp.

Although it wasn't 'dangerously slow' if you revved the nuts off it in low gears, with presumably about 10bhp below about 5000rpm.

itz_baseline

833 posts

251 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
I've always thought Renaults Grand Scenic with the 1.5dci engine seems a little under powered for a car with 7 seats. Anyone used one 7-up in the real world?

MC Bodge

29,743 posts

205 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Motorrad said:
bks about this 'you can't drive' st.

Come off the Grange roundabout at full throttle in a modern 1.2 Corsa and try to make it up Lindale Hill without slowing to fully laden HGV pace. I found it frankly disturbing that a modern car couldn't maintain over 60mph given appropriate use of the throttle and gears. The fker is too heavy for the engine.
...but do you actually *need* to be able to do 60mph up there?

Urban Sports

11,321 posts

233 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
Golf SDI

Triumph Man

9,601 posts

198 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
A 1995 BMW 520i wink



DeltonaS

3,707 posts

168 months

Wednesday 6th August 2014
quotequote all
- VW Polo Bluemotion diesel, with a long geared 75 hp, 1 ltr 3 cilinder diesel......(possibly not for sale in the UK ??)

Terrible car.

- Volvo S80 1.6 D Drive E........................
- Mercedes E 200 CDI...................
- VW Golf V SDI..............