Is there a better handling sports car than a Boxster S?
Is there a better handling sports car than a Boxster S?
Author
Discussion

mdrc

Original Poster:

446 posts

303 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Having just bought my wife a 2011 MY Boxster S and having driven many other types of sports cars, including the 911, Ferraris etc.... I am genuinely astonished by how well it drives and handles. It truly deserves all the accolades it seems to receive from the motoring press, but prompted me to ask the question.... Is there a better handling car out there, pound for pound??

SkinnyP

1,999 posts

179 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
If you think the Boxster is good wait until you try the Cayman.

huwp

833 posts

205 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Having changed a Boxster for a Caterham I'd say the Boxster couldn't touch the 7 in the dry.

JackReacher

2,282 posts

245 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Elise would out handle it. But doesn't do everything else so well.

Hoofy

80,066 posts

312 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
MR2?

Noble M12?

zebra

4,555 posts

244 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
mdrc said:
Having just bought my wife a 2011 MY Boxster S and having driven many other types of sports cars, including the 911, Ferraris etc.... I am genuinely astonished by how well it drives and handles. It truly deserves all the accolades it seems to receive from the motoring press, but prompted me to ask the question.... Is there a better handling car out there, pound for pound??
If it's about handling and not speed...

Elise
Exige
Any 7
Cayman

are all better handling

rb5er

11,657 posts

202 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Yes several.

andysgriff

913 posts

290 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Yes

Megaflow

11,520 posts

255 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Several, as other pointed out already.

Is there another car which makes a better job of balancing a sports car with everyday use ability. Probably not IMO.

zippyprorider

736 posts

236 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
My exige would leave it for dead

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
mdrc said:
I am genuinely astonished by how well it drives and handles. It truly deserves all the accolades it seems to receive from the motoring press, but prompted me to ask the question.... Is there a better handling car out there, pound for pound??
You are right - the Boxster S is a truly astounding sportscar, especially taking account of its relatively accessible price. The handling is truly sublime.

The only cars I know which can compare in the handling department are typically what I would call "trackday specials" as opposed to proper road cars. Lotus Evora is perhaps the nearest comparison but it's a lot more expensive and weirdly packaged/styled - it's engine sits high above the back axle whereas the flat 6 in Boxster sits lower and further forward.

HorneyMX5

5,754 posts

180 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
MX5.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
mdrc said:
Having just bought my wife a 2011 MY Boxster S...
...wait 'til you try a 981!

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
zippyprorider said:
My exige would leave it for dead
Except of course, in the real world, "for dead" means a couple of seconds a lap faster, or say 2 car lengths on after a "traffic light GP"........

To "leave something for dead" ime, either on track or the road, you need massively more power (lets say 4x) and ideally massive downforce too.


So, yes, an Exige will be a bit better to drive, largely due to being a bit lower mass, but you "pay" for that with a car that is nowhere as good as being "a car" the rest of the time. You pays your money, you makes your choice ;-)

Jonstar

1,044 posts

221 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Except of course, in the real world, "for dead" means a couple of seconds a lap faster, or say 2 car lengths on after a "traffic light GP"........

To "leave something for dead" ime, either on track or the road, you need massively more power (lets say 4x) and ideally massive downforce too.


So, yes, an Exige will be a bit better to drive, largely due to being a bit lower mass, but you "pay" for that with a car that is nowhere as good as being "a car" the rest of the time. You pays your money, you makes your choice ;-)
I think you are taking his phrase a bit too literally, an exige would be a better handling car end of. Also the question was about handling so in this instance "the rest of the time" is irrelevant.

Mastodon2

14,325 posts

195 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Except of course, in the real world, "for dead" means a couple of seconds a lap faster, or say 2 car lengths on after a "traffic light GP"........

To "leave something for dead" ime, either on track or the road, you need massively more power (lets say 4x) and ideally massive downforce too.
To me, "for dead" in the real world means "significantly further down the road" than the slower car. For example, when an Exige is going for it on an empty road, and the Boxster loses it within a few corners for example. Not that you see that sort of thing terribly often on the road, but I imagine most competent drivers, familiar with performance cars could do their favourite loop of roads quicker in an Exige than they could in a Boxster, if they fancied it.

Tickle

6,466 posts

234 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Elise, Exige, Caterham 7

Pebbles167

4,577 posts

182 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
MR2 MK3, although it wont win any races with its slightly lackluster engine.

Joeguard1990

1,217 posts

156 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
So many PH's Wifes on here getting new cars, what are they doing right?!

Impasse

15,099 posts

271 months

Monday 25th August 2014
quotequote all
Swallowing.