Lawyers
Author
Discussion

srebbe64

Original Poster:

13,021 posts

260 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
I'm in the process of buying a small commercial property, because my business needs a little more space. It's an empty building so there are no complications - price is agreed and everything should be straight forward. I told my lawyer that I needed to be in by the first week of January. He said, back in October, "no problem".

He calls me yesterday to say that he can't make the deadline because he's going on holiday to Australia and no one can deal with it in his absense. I said to him "if I said to my clients, I can't do such and such because I'm going on holiday, I'd be out of business". He said "well property law is a very specialist area". I said to him "the decision you need to make, is either get the deal done by Christmas and retain my custom, or don't do it and lose my future business". He elected for the latter.

I will have the last laugh though. I've got quite a big property and business deal brewing and I'll be getting legal quotes submitted in February (probably). I'll let him spend hours preparing a detailed quote, get him through to the final two and then decline him - reminding him of yesterday's conversation.

Only a lawyer could be that arrogant.

thebluemonkey

1,296 posts

263 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
Could one of the thousands of solicitors about not help you with this or is it more complicated in the case of commercial property ?

Yes it was intentional

alexkp

16,484 posts

267 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
Just been dealing with a total wit of a solicitor myself - who said the issue would take 2-3 months tops to resolve. We are now up to 7 months with no resolution to a very simple matter.

Pretty much all Lawyers/Solicitors in my fairly extensive experience of them are incompetent and arrogant.

The job they do is mostly very easy, and they charge a fortune for it. I usually end up doing most of it myself anyway just to get things done.

Problem is they don't really care about customer service or their reputations. And as a customer, you are really just an irritation that interrupts their golf/extended lunch/holiday.

>> Edited by alexkp on Thursday 16th December 23:08

vixpy1

42,697 posts

287 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
srebbe64 said:


Only a lawyer could be that arrogant.






Phil Dicky

7,193 posts

286 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
I've never know a profession full of such wasters, nothing ever goes to plan and gets completed on time.
Tos*ers the lot of them, well perhaps not all of them.

Phil

vixpy1

42,697 posts

287 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
I once dated a Law student, I understand now that no matter how perfect her tits were (and they were perfect) It really was not worth the hassle!

>> Edited by vixpy1 on Thursday 16th December 23:09

srebbe64

Original Poster:

13,021 posts

260 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
thebluemonkey said:
Could one of the thousands of solicitors about not help you with this or is it more complicated in the case of commercial property ?

Yes it was intentional

No it's not complicated, he's obviously got an 'ego' problem. In point of fact, it doesn't matter because today I met the current owner, explained the situation to him and he's agreed that I can move in whenever I like - and the legals can then be done retrospectively. Such things can be progressed so much quicker when the two parties talk direct.

shnozz

30,058 posts

294 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


yep, and pretty much all the posts I have read of yours are arrogant and full of adoration of your own self belief. So from your own analysis of the legal profession you will quite happily be compentent enough to deal with your own legal affairs. tit.

alexkp

16,484 posts

267 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
shnozz said:


anonymous said:
[redacted]




yep, and pretty much all the posts I have read of yours are arrogant and full of adoration of your own self belief. So from your own analysis of the legal profession you will quite happily be compentent enough to deal with your own legal affairs. tit.



I think you've just proved my point thanks.

Oh, and learn to spell and write English while you are at it - don't want any confusion on those legal documents.

>> Edited by alexkp on Thursday 16th December 23:48

shnozz

30,058 posts

294 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
edited by Alexkp.......

and you have proved my point too. ta

tit

alexkp

16,484 posts

267 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
shnozz said:
edited by Alexkp.......

and you have proved my point too. ta

tit


I edited it to add the second comment.

So how have I proved your point?

shnozz

30,058 posts

294 months

Thursday 16th December 2004
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


oh come on Director of Media / Senior Academic. Full of self belief should have been highlighted with flying colours in your last post. I wouldn't wish to insult your own intelligence if you fail to see the irony in your arrogance bearded fellow/

If you have such little respect then why use lawyers at all? As you are no doubt fully aware, the Courts are open for lay individuals to utilise. Why waste your money with us mere uneducated individuals?

wedge girl

4,688 posts

262 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
Many of the Lawyers on PH have been very generous with both their time and their very good free advice on and off of the forum.

My own solictor has just drafted my will for free.

Maybe you should try treating people as you wish to be treated, it's the holiday season maybe he wants some quality time with his family, like you say you've managed to make arrangements with the vendor, so it's caused you no hardship.

Zod

35,295 posts

281 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
err, if I or one of my partners said anything like that to our clients, then we would be a lot poorer next year.

Is this a sole practitioner? If so, then teh guy should have communicated better. Going on holiday is all very well, but dealign with clients in this way is simply not on.

We cancel holidays all the time for client needs, but then my firm is rather larger and more expensive than the average high street firm.

vixpy1

42,697 posts

287 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
wedge girl said:
Many of the Lawyers on PH have been very generous with both their time and their very good free advice on and off of the forum.



Very true!

shnozz

30,058 posts

294 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
wedge girl said:
Many of the Lawyers on PH have been very generous with both their time and their very good free advice on and off of the forum.


come on wedge girl, we are all incompetent and arrogant. Those PHers that have had free advice from me and financially gained - I was wrong! hand it back to your opponent!

alexkp

16,484 posts

267 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


I'll try and make sense of what you are saying.

Sorry if you find my profession threatening. Conversely, few people seem to have any real regard for yours.

Where does the "bearded fellow" comment come from? Do you have a problem with beards? It's called Pogrophobia and is a recognised condition. Or even stranger, do you know me? Perhaps you were one of the solicitors who has failed me in the past?

In response to your second point, I try to use solicitors as little as possible. However, in the past five years I have had to deal with at least seven or eight at length. These ranged from local solicitors who screwed up dealing with my mother's will and caused considerable distress to my family, or rendered me homeless over a Christmas and New Year due to failing to complete on a house as they had lost the paperwork, to London firms charging £400 per hour for advice that made matters worse until I took charge and sorted the problem myself.

I'm so sorry if you are uncomfortable with the general public's perception of the profession, but hey, you chose it. Find me someone who will honestly say that they have had a positive experience of solicitors in this country and I'll be impressed.

Anyhow, I'm sure you buck the trend. But you should know that calling people names is pretty childish and could be considered defamatory.

shnozz

30,058 posts

294 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
threatening. no. give a toss. no. interested. not really.

sorry your experiences have been so poor. Name calling. Yes. In response to generalisation. Yes. Will I sleep. Ooooh, yes.

Your experience with the legal profession seems pretty poor. My apologies. Cannot give you that in writing as it would be £16. But you want to take the stereotype approach then fair enough. I assume that you will forgive me for taking a similar approach to directors of media? If so, I am afraid I am a little more broad minded. night all

shnozz

30,058 posts

294 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
apologies, just noticed you are a "senior academic". I don't appear to be qualified sufficiently to even speak to you, let alone question your post. My apologies. night

alexkp

16,484 posts

267 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
shnozz said:
apologies, just noticed you are a "senior academic". I don't appear to be qualified sufficiently to even speak to you, let alone question your post. My apologies. night


I have no problem with you questioning my post. Why not just keep it civil and courteous?