unwanted oversteer
Author
Discussion

vanordinaire

Original Poster:

3,701 posts

192 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
I know 'unwanted oversteer' is a bit of an oxymoron on Pistonheads, we all love oversteer but my daughter's clio seems to have massive amounts on lift off as soon as the roads get the slightest bit wet/greasy. Tracking, camber, brakes etc are all fine, tyres are cheapish but not rubbish and almost new. It's only a 1.2 16v so I really can't see why it's so severe. It goes sideways on a wet roundabout easier than my MX5. It's nice and controllable but not really suitable for a 17 year old on her first car . Are they all like this or can anyone suggest what might be wrong?

Baryonyx

18,284 posts

189 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
Are you lifting off the throttle under cornering load?

Alternatively, what sort of shape are are the droplinks, bushes and ARB in?

s m

24,477 posts

233 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
What tyres out of interest?

BULLITT Rich

550 posts

246 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
Small French hatchbacks are all in the lift-off oversteer club.

Trick would be to change driving style, last time I checked maintaining constant speed was a test requirement and a throttle isn't a switch. Instead of lifting off, try just backing off the throttle a bit and maintaining revs at something low steady whilst navigating bends/roundabouts.

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
Strut top bushes? I had them go on a Sierra & it made it very tail happy. Sticky rear brakes could be another option?

vanordinaire

Original Poster:

3,701 posts

192 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
It is 'lift off' oversteer and quite easy to control but far too sensitive in my opinion. I've changed the steering rack and wishbones recently and it's just been through an MOT this week so droplinks, bushes etc should be ok although I never did anything with them. Are they likely to make a difference?

TheRealFingers99

1,996 posts

158 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
Let her have the MX5 while you take the Clio: your car requires less skill to drive (and is probably slower).

But decent tyres are a must -- treat her to a set of Rainsports.

Geekman

2,907 posts

176 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
BULLITT Rich said:
Small French hatchbacks are all in the lift-off oversteer club.

Trick would be to change driving style, last time I checked maintaining constant speed was a test requirement and a throttle isn't a switch. Instead of lifting off, try just backing off the throttle a bit and maintaining revs at something low steady whilst navigating bends/roundabouts.
There's no way you should have to do that in a modern hatchback though. If all Clios were like that there'd be thousands of them flying off the roads every day.

davepoth

29,395 posts

229 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
Yup. Decent tyres all round, but put the best ones on the back. also take a couple of PSI out of the rears, that will increase the contact patch a little.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
Geekman said:
There's no way you should have to do that in a modern hatchback though. If all Clios were like that there'd be thousands of them flying off the roads every day.
Agreed.

Start off with checking tyre pressures, then get the full four-wheel alignment checked. Is it similarly tail-happy turning both ways, or do you mostly notice on r'a'bs (so turning right)? Wouldn't surprise me if something was less than straight.

vanordinaire

Original Poster:

3,701 posts

192 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
s m said:
What tyres out of interest?
I can't actually remember and she's got the car away at college just now. Probably Vredesteins or something similar as I find them good on muddy country roads and that's what our local garage uses as a mid-range tyre.

Olivera

8,778 posts

269 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
Almost certainly caused by cheap and nasty rear tyres.

BritishRacinGrin

26,542 posts

190 months

Wednesday 17th September 2014
quotequote all
Olivera said:
Almost certainly caused by cheap and nasty rear tyres.
This.

John D.

21,025 posts

239 months

Wednesday 17th September 2014
quotequote all
The tyres might just be too old as well. They last forever on the back of a Clio. I used to rotate mine to counter this (front to back, not round and round; before anyone gets clever!)

BritishRacinGrin

26,542 posts

190 months

Wednesday 17th September 2014
quotequote all
John D. said:
The tyres might just be too old as well.
True- check the DOT code OP. A while ago I had to replace the rear tyres on my mum's Corsa even though they had 4mm left as they were hardening and cracking. From now on when the front tyres wear out I'll rotate the part worn rears to the front and but the new tyres on the back.

T0MMY

1,562 posts

206 months

Wednesday 17th September 2014
quotequote all
Assuming they're the same tyres front and back so you can't swap them round to see if it makes a difference, I guess you could fiddle with the tyre pressures? Little bit softer at the back, harder at the front. Just as the cheapest bodge really...ideally you should get some decent tyres on there. This is all assuming there isn't actually a fault with the car or the geometry is out etc.

My Xsara VTS was very oversteery...I wouldn't say more so than an MX5 but probably harder to control when it did go. I presume you've briefed her on how to prevent it sliding/what to do when it does slide? Planting the throttle as well as countersteering and the importance of getting the lock off just before it grips again etc. That last bit is what tends to catch out inexperienced drivers I reckon.