What springs and shock?
What springs and shock?
Author
Discussion

Top Gear TVR

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

183 months

Saturday 27th September 2014
quotequote all
Gents - I have seen the wiki but i think my rears are tiring a bit already!

Whats the best set-up?

glenrobbo

40,445 posts

179 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Hi Steve,

How long since you fitted the GG Pro's? Surely not that long ago?

And what are your symptoms of tiredness of the rears?

If you fancy an upgrade, the perceived wisdom is to fit Nitrons, with 450 front springs & 375 rears, but Nitrons are a good deal more pricey, and you then start to get into the realms of diminishing returns for exponentially greater outlay.

You need to establish what you want from your S, and how important those couple of extra tenths really are. Are you intending to go playing with the Sprint Challenge Series boys, or stick with the trackdays?

Perhaps you should be looking at tyre choices & geo set-up etc.?

But whatever you do, don't listen to me, I know nothing apart from what I've read/ learned/ heard. wink

Perhaps you'd be better asking the racers? ( Like AutoAndy or Max wink Haha! )

Edited by glenrobbo on Sunday 28th September 00:10

Top Gear TVR

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

183 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
It's a bit saggy and bouncy.....

v8s4me

7,275 posts

248 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Go back to the originals! thumbup Properly refurbished and set up they should last around 50,000 miles minimum. My rears were "saggy" after 90,000 miles but fronts were still OK. How long did your GG Pro's last?

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Deeman

1,609 posts

211 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
Hi Steve,

the perceived wisdom is to fit Nitrons, with 450 front springs & 375 rears
Any idea why?

glenrobbo

40,445 posts

179 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
I'm no expert Pete - far from it, but I'm told Nitrons are the best for the price - if you can afford them.
And those spring rates give the best handling/ride compromise once you get the damping rates & ride heights set up properly.

It's all down to how far you want to go on the quest for perfection, bit you are limited by many factors like chassis design & geometry; suspension bushes & bearings, anti-roll bar thickness & links, the list just goes on.

Personally I have decided to enjoy my S as it is & not worry too much about a never-ending quest for performance, as long as it continues to give me so much pleasure for so little outlay, I see no reason to change that happy state of affairs. cloud9

Top Gear TVR

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

183 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Glenn

I think theres something about the quality of the springs that come with these aftermarket kits.

I feel my rears are somewhat softer than they were when they were 1st fitted.

glenrobbo

40,445 posts

179 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Is this just a subjective evaluation Steve, or do you have any empirical data re load vs. deflection etc.?
I would not expect springs to lose their temper in such a short time.

Perhaps you are getting more perceived saggyness due to higher cornering speeds which come with increased confidence?

Plus you have more unsprung weight now with those mahoosive dinner plates of yours. wink

Deeman

1,609 posts

211 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
Personally I have decided to enjoy my S as it is & not worry too much about a never-ending quest for performance, as long as it continues to give me so much pleasure for so little outlay, I see no reason to change that happy state of affairs. cloud9
Nice choice of words Glen - and wise words. I could do a wallet busting exercise on the "S" or just treat it as maintenance and gradual improvement. The truth is, its a bit of a toy, so when there's some spare bunce, the "S" benefits. But that's never going to make mine a show queen. But then I don't particularly like polishing and ogling. I'd rather take it for a blast. The pit of money is always there to be jumped in, but your right in that there's a place for happy middle ground.

magpies

5,203 posts

211 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Deeman said:
glenrobbo said:
Personally I have decided to enjoy my S as it is & not worry too much about a never-ending quest for performance, as long as it continues to give me so much pleasure for so little outlay, I see no reason to change that happy state of affairs. cloud9
Nice choice of words Glen - and wise words. I could do a wallet busting exercise on the "S" or just treat it as maintenance and gradual improvement. The truth is, its a bit of a toy, so when there's some spare bunce, the "S" benefits. But that's never going to make mine a show queen. But then I don't particularly like polishing and ogling. I'd rather take it for a blast. The pit of money is always there to be jumped in, but your right in that there's a place for happy middle ground.
/\/\/\ this is the way to do it if you can

bit more difficult if you've bought a dog and it needs every thing

Top Gear TVR

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

183 months

Sunday 28th September 2014
quotequote all
Each to their own approach I say....one mans dog etc

vjay48

194 posts

188 months

Monday 29th September 2014
quotequote all
I deal with Gaz as control shocks in a racing championship,not the best but not the worse,if you have any doubt send them to be serviced. You might be surprised at the service and price.

Ab Shocks

1,686 posts

249 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
Hmm
Ive sold loads of S kits with very little trouble so dont understand the problem, perhaps a PM would help
Those who are looking for alternatives with more options could maybe consider the new Gaz TA product because seperate bump and rebound control can be what the sprinters and hillclimbers need.
The Gaz monotubes are now also highly regarded for those looking for that type of product.