Porsche 911SC - still not in vogue?
Discussion
I have seen literally hundreds of threads regarding 993's and 964's......
but in comparison there is seldom much interest shown for SC's.
Is this because usually the type of folk with SC's don't own a computer/aren't on the internet?
I recently bought an SC to accompany the 993 I already own and it's been a revelation-
although obviously not as fast as the 993 the SC is still an exciting car to drive-the handling
is proper old skool 911 and I wish I'd bought one ages ago.
Brightwells auctioned a late 70's SC coupe earlier in the year with an estimate of 15k but it sold for 26k-
in general though they seem good value compared to the later air cooled models....I think many people scouting around for a 964 at top whack prices would be better off spending less dough and getting a well sorted SC-
I understand they are a completely different beast to the 993/964 but an SC offers the real 911 experience and has a lot of character.....at a considerably cheaper cost- why are they still unfashionable?
here's a couple of pics of mine to add some colour to the thread...
please add your SC pics if you have any-
but in comparison there is seldom much interest shown for SC's.
Is this because usually the type of folk with SC's don't own a computer/aren't on the internet?
I recently bought an SC to accompany the 993 I already own and it's been a revelation-
although obviously not as fast as the 993 the SC is still an exciting car to drive-the handling
is proper old skool 911 and I wish I'd bought one ages ago.
Brightwells auctioned a late 70's SC coupe earlier in the year with an estimate of 15k but it sold for 26k-
in general though they seem good value compared to the later air cooled models....I think many people scouting around for a 964 at top whack prices would be better off spending less dough and getting a well sorted SC-
I understand they are a completely different beast to the 993/964 but an SC offers the real 911 experience and has a lot of character.....at a considerably cheaper cost- why are they still unfashionable?
here's a couple of pics of mine to add some colour to the thread...
please add your SC pics if you have any-
Having owned an '85 3.2 and had the use of Porsche GB's press SC for a week a few years before, there's no doubt in my mind that the SC was the better car. Some of that was doubtless been down to preparation and newness (in the case of the SC), but even allowing for that I preferred the SC driving experience. It felt more alive.
mollytherocker said:
The SC is certainly in vogue. Have you seen the prices?
This; it's difficult to see any air cooled 911s as being 'not in vogue' at the moment*. There are plenty of enthusiasts who prefer the slightly raw and 'zingy' feel of the SC over the later cars and at the same time they are much more usable that the pre-73s. SS7
*with the possible exception of a brown/brown mid-70s 2.7 targa Sporto.
If you go onto the ImpactBumpers forum you'll certainly see their is a keen following for the SC.
I've never driven a SC, but owned late G50 3.2 Carrera's.
I guess the majority would pick a G50 3.2 Carrera being the last in the G-series line.
As prices have moved on the SC does seem to offer greater value for money over an early 915 3.2 Carrera.
Like all these cars it's more a case of buy on condition and get the best you can afford.
They're all beautiful cars and a joy to own when sorted and running properly.
I've never driven a SC, but owned late G50 3.2 Carrera's.
I guess the majority would pick a G50 3.2 Carrera being the last in the G-series line.
As prices have moved on the SC does seem to offer greater value for money over an early 915 3.2 Carrera.
Like all these cars it's more a case of buy on condition and get the best you can afford.
They're all beautiful cars and a joy to own when sorted and running properly.
FlopperV60 said:
I've just bought one:
Interestingly I have insured it on an agreed valuation policy and their valuation I think is low as these do seem to be appreciating, compared to the earlier 2.7 and the later 3.2 they represent good value for money.
Very nice indeed....
Interestingly I have insured it on an agreed valuation policy and their valuation I think is low as these do seem to be appreciating, compared to the earlier 2.7 and the later 3.2 they represent good value for money.
Mine is a 1982 model so is 204bhp.
She likes some proper revs to get going- considering all the police cameras
round my way I'm not worried too much about 150mph...she's fun to drive even at low
speeds on the country roads......I sound like John Denver-I'll go now.
david hockney said:
Very nice indeed....
Mine is a 1982 model so is 204bhp.
She likes some proper revs to get going- considering all the police cameras
round my way I'm not worried too much about 150mph...she's fun to drive even at low
speeds on the country roads......I sound like John Denver-I'll go now.
I saw your thread on IB the car looks great.Mine is a 1982 model so is 204bhp.
She likes some proper revs to get going- considering all the police cameras
round my way I'm not worried too much about 150mph...she's fun to drive even at low
speeds on the country roads......I sound like John Denver-I'll go now.
Mines not actually on the road yet as waiting for some new seats from the states, so far Williams Crawford have fitted SSI's and a Dansk silencer, pop off valve for the airbox, removed the front fog lights and fitted smaller front indicators. I have some lightweight door cards being fitted and the air con removed along with some other bits and pieces to trim weight. with some new rubber and corner weighted I'm hoping she will be fun to drive
I'm not sure about the smooth lid and might explore a ducktail.
I like the look of this:
I was adamant the awful tea tray spoiler had to go- I did consider a ducktail but ultimately thought the smooth engine lid would look best whilst also being a factory standard as the tea tray was an option when new. I certainly don't think it's imperative to have a rear spoiler for the sake of the handling......if I leave the road and enter a hedge it's more likely due to my crap driving than the spoiler delete.
david hockney said:
I was adamant the awful tea tray spoiler had to go- I did consider a ducktail but ultimately thought the smooth engine lid would look best whilst also being a factory standard as the tea tray was an option when new. I certainly don't think it's imperative to have a rear spoiler for the sake of the handling......if I leave the road and enter a hedge it's more likely due to my crap driving than the spoiler delete.
I'm with you on the spoiler, it's just too much for the car.In the short term I am going to stick with a smooth lid, living with it and spending many hours cleaning and tinkering will probably give me some inspiration further down the line.
Because mine has some RUF bits and pieces I might even consider some 'yellowbird' style front and rear bumpers but again that can wait!
The problem is knowing when to stop. Mine is at a Porsche specialist now....I took it with the view
of having two jobs done...and now it's having about 10 jobs done to get it just right....which is all
fine as long as I have enough money left over to buy the basics for living, bread, milk, tea bags etc-
I've stopped buying those expensive Nespresso coffee capsules in a bid to economise.
of having two jobs done...and now it's having about 10 jobs done to get it just right....which is all
fine as long as I have enough money left over to buy the basics for living, bread, milk, tea bags etc-
I've stopped buying those expensive Nespresso coffee capsules in a bid to economise.
hopeydaze said:
OK, I'll ask the stupid question. What is the price range for a well sorted, rust free SC, not a museum piece so that one is happy to drive it and put the miles on.
voila http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...FlopperV60 said:
I've just bought one:
Interestingly I have insured it on an agreed valuation policy and their valuation I think is low as these do seem to be appreciating, compared to the earlier 2.7 and the later 3.2 they represent good value for money.
Ruf wheels really set the car off. congrats.Interestingly I have insured it on an agreed valuation policy and their valuation I think is low as these do seem to be appreciating, compared to the earlier 2.7 and the later 3.2 they represent good value for money.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I understand F1 drivers go on crash diets for qualifying etc- Lewis Hamilton and co are indeed tinyhumans....if I lost my gut I would have a better power to weight ratio but I don't need to shave
1 second off my journey time when I'm only going to Aldi to buy some Aunt Bessie Yorkshire puddings. It should be noted that prior to becoming obsessed with 911's I shopped at Waitrose not Aldi.
Regarding the price for a well sorted SC- looking at the classifieds they seem to be all over the place.
Definitely 20k+ for a nice one from a dealer. I'd be concerned buying a cheap one private without a ppi and
a thorough look over- many have a rust issue by now. Getting the right spec is difficult-loads of Targa and convertibles....I wanted a red coupe with black leather interior and had to wait- not many seem to crop up.
Gassing Station | Porsche General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff