Recommend me a camera
Author
Discussion

boyse7en

Original Poster:

7,988 posts

189 months

Friday 3rd October 2014
quotequote all
Having just spent 3 days at the Cologne Motorcycle show photographing stuff for news stories (print and web) I'm heartily fed up with the performance of my current camera setup, so I'm looking for some recommendations/hints/tips smile

Currently using a Canon Eos 30D with a Sigma 18-50mm F2.8-4.5 HSM lens and a Sigma EF610 flash gun.

Nearly always have it set on Auto, as there usually no time to fiddle around with settings, 10 seconds and the person/bike/scene can be gone.

So what am I looking for?

Good low-light shooting
A 'live' rear screen so I can shoot with the camera held above my head and have some idea of what I am pointing at (current Canon is viewfinder-only)
Wide-angle lens, either with reasonable zoom or interchangeable to telephoto lens.


On the 'nice to have' list are light weight (kit gets heavy after lugging it around for days on end) and small size to make it easier to pack for foreign trips.

So, consumer-spec SLR? Bridge camera? or one of the new small-format interchangeable lens cameras like the Nikon N1?

Budget depends on how much I can get my boss to spend, but if i can show him the benefits then he usually coughs up smile

TheRainMaker

7,708 posts

266 months

Friday 3rd October 2014
quotequote all
A Sony A7 would be perfect for you by the sounds of it.

Light - Yep
Small - Yep (for a DSLR anyway)
Good in low light - Yep
Back Screen can point down - Yep
Interchangeable lenses - Yep

I would recommend getting it without the kit lens and go for the Zeiss 24-70 F4

Lynchie999

3,622 posts

177 months

Friday 3rd October 2014
quotequote all
TheRainMaker said:
A Sony A7 would be perfect for you by the sounds of it.

Light - Yep
Small - Yep (for a DSLR anyway)
Good in low light - Yep
Back Screen can point down - Yep
Interchangeable lenses - Yep

I would recommend getting it without the kit lens and go for the Zeiss 24-70 F4
what he said... and FFrame too! you know.. gets more in shot when needed!

oddball1973

1,457 posts

147 months

Friday 3rd October 2014
quotequote all
Olympus OM-D (M10, M1 or M5)
Micro 4/3 so not too bulky, good high ISO performance, fully tilting screen, fixed F2.8 lens' available.

marctwo

3,666 posts

284 months

Friday 3rd October 2014
quotequote all
oddball1973 said:
Olympus OM-D (M10, M1 or M5)
Micro 4/3 so not too bulky, good high ISO performance, fully tilting screen, fixed F2.8 lens' available.
Great cameras but not as good in low light as the Sony though. They do focus faster though! Also, f0.95 lenses available if needed!

Lynchie999

3,622 posts

177 months

Friday 3rd October 2014
quotequote all
... isn't the A7S the one thats good for low light ??

mrdemon

21,146 posts

289 months

Friday 3rd October 2014
quotequote all
Canon 70D, yes I would say that because I own one people might say, but that's why I DO own one, great auto focus and movable rear screen

TheRainMaker

7,708 posts

266 months

Saturday 4th October 2014
quotequote all
Lynchie999 said:
... isn't the A7S the one thats good for low light ??
It's better than a A7 but it's also twice the cost smile

dojo

741 posts

159 months

Sunday 5th October 2014
quotequote all
Fuji XT1 should do it

rottie102

4,033 posts

208 months

Monday 6th October 2014
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
Nearly always have it set on Auto, as there usually no time to fiddle around with settings, 10 seconds and the person/bike/scene can be gone.
I'll go against the crowd here and say that changing that attitude and knowing what you're doing and practising it will be much cheaper and improve your photos much greater than getting new kit.

10 sec is A VERY LONG TIME wink

boyse7en

Original Poster:

7,988 posts

189 months

Monday 6th October 2014
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
I'll go against the crowd here and say that changing that attitude and knowing what you're doing and practising it will be much cheaper and improve your photos much greater than getting new kit.

10 sec is A VERY LONG TIME wink
It is, but not long enough in a jostling crowd, often with flashing/changing lights, to be fiddling with too many settings. If I know what the picture is likely to be (ie, close up, bit of a distance etc) I try to set it to AP to work the depth of field and adjust shutter speed to suit. And no matter how good/quick I get with the settings, I still have no idea of framing most of the time as the camera has no rear screen.

This is one I took, just to give you an idea...


Spotlights, lasers, smoke, flashes, and I'm about three rows back balancing on a bit of exhibition stand holding the camera over my head, which explains why the bike is cropped off (no rear screen on camera to see what I am doing)

rottie102

4,033 posts

208 months

Monday 6th October 2014
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
It is, but not long enough in a jostling crowd, often with flashing/changing lights, to be fiddling with too many settings. If I know what the picture is likely to be (ie, close up, bit of a distance etc) I try to set it to AP to work the depth of field and adjust shutter speed to suit. And no matter how good/quick I get with the settings, I still have no idea of framing most of the time as the camera has no rear screen.

This is one I took, just to give you an idea...


Spotlights, lasers, smoke, flashes, and I'm about three rows back balancing on a bit of exhibition stand holding the camera over my head, which explains why the bike is cropped off (no rear screen on camera to see what I am doing)
Nope, you didn't convince me biggrin

philip55

3 posts

139 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Brief Review of the Canon Powershot G7X, Canon’s high-end compact camera http://thedigitalcamera.net/canon-powershot-g7x-th...

boyse7en

Original Poster:

7,988 posts

189 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
Nope, you didn't convince me biggrin
I'm not wanting to start an argument, but I'm not sure how to "practice" shooting in an environment that changes every few seconds. I'm at the shows to report news, and part of that includes taking photographs. I want them to be as good as possible, but I am in no way a professional photographer.

Simpo Two

91,536 posts

289 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
How about - get the magazine etc to send a photographer so you can concentrate on newsgathering while he takes the photos. Both will be better as result.

If that's not an option then the best way to practice taking photos of a changing environment is to go to a changing environment and practice, sorry smile

Technically you have the right idea, but shoot RAW so you can correct colours and exposure nicely afterwards, and consider exposure auto-bracket if you have it. Also consider a wider angle lens to reduce framing problems (you can always crop off the psare bits later.

mike80

2,405 posts

240 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
You need whatever newish Canon has a tilting screen, and that's pretty much it. The image quality will be a lot better than your current camera at high ISO, and that lens is pretty wide. Maybe a Canon 16-35 (expensive!) or 17-40 (not as expensive but slightly slower) would be handy. Or something like a Canon/Sigma/whoever 10-20, 10-22 or similar. Depends how much distortion you want!

Apart from that, this sort of event is always quite tricky to shoot - so it's down to your skills and technique. There's no magic camera that will sort that!