Would anybody buy a car with a rotary engine?
Would anybody buy a car with a rotary engine?
Author
Discussion

baccalad

Original Poster:

220 posts

145 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
I would like for them to become a little more widespread with more manufacturers putting them in cars.

I don't know of any/many cars still being produced today with rotary engines?

B'stard Child

31,124 posts

276 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
You're a fan - have you tried google

Can they get them to meet modern emissions?

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

255 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
In principle a great design being very compact, powerful and with few moving parts. Although in practice compared to piston engines they are very thirsty, have poor emissions and are not as durable. RX8 is probably the zenith of wankel engine development and the downsides were still just too great over an equivalent piston engine.




unpc

2,998 posts

243 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
Don't think even Mazda do any more. There's a reason for it though as they are not terribly efficient and have poor emissions compared with otto cycle engines.

Mastodon2

14,333 posts

195 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
I think even Mazda have given up on them now, mainly because of the poor MPG/power ratio, higher emissions and shorter lifespan than a piston engine.

tr7v8

7,622 posts

258 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
You do know lots of passenger jets have wankel APUs in the tail run off of diesel?

Pyrolysis

338 posts

147 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
I had an rx8 years ago. It was fun for a while but wasn't as fast as it should have been and the running costs were not on par with the performance. It would have to be a rotary with considerably better rounded attributes to tempt me in the future!

Pyrolysis

338 posts

147 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
tr7v8 said:
You do know lots of passenger jets have wankel APUs in the tail run off of diesel?
No, but I do now! Thanks for that useless nugget of information biggrin

Higgs boson

1,105 posts

183 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
tr7v8 said:
off of
Sorry, Jim. No. Just no.

I did check your profile. If you're an American, my apologies. soapbox

otolith

69,105 posts

234 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
They are very smooth and powerful for their size and to a lesser extent their weight. This enables you to package a car with more interior space and a weight distribution conducive to better handling. They have intrinsically poorer fuel consumption than similarly powerful piston engines and are less durable.

When most of the cars on the road are boring, nose-heavy front drive boxes, usually with four pot diesel engines, you can see where the public's priorities are.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

228 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
The RX8 230 bhp I really enjoyed its handling on the track - have never driven on the road.

I've no idea what MPG it did or didn't do


It appears from users that it has low MPG 20's (Very similar to the same powered Focus ST 2.5 yet those owners and others seem to generally ignore that.

I have heard that they can have hot starting problems and no idea what % it impacts but there is noise about rebuilds - the thing which is overlooked is you can buy Rx8's for £1k or that kind of money if it goes wrong scrap it and buy another its many multiples cheaper than a Focus ST.




New models though as its only Mazda pushing the technology R&D is tiny v piston engines in road cars so getting it to pass the EU regs may cost so much that they simply wouldn't make any money from the car sales. Plus hybrid/electric is the new tech so focus on that game.
Good on them for being different and not just with engines but light cars and simple fun cars like MX5

otolith

69,105 posts

234 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
There is another rotary Mazda in development. Wouldn't be surprised if they don't bother selling it in Europe.

vikingaero

13,362 posts

199 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
I'm on the other side of the fence on this. Look at the values of 2nd hand RX8's and see the reason why - the wankel engine.

I currently have a Clubman but would have seriously considered a 2.0T or V6 RX8 for one reason - longevity.

wolves_wanderer

12,956 posts

267 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
The RX8 230 bhp I really enjoyed its handling on the track - have never driven on the road.

I've no idea what MPG it did or didn't do


It appears from users that it has low MPG 20's (Very similar to the same powered Focus ST 2.5 yet those owners and others seem to generally ignore that.

I have heard that they can have hot starting problems and no idea what % it impacts but there is noise about rebuilds - the thing which is overlooked is you can buy Rx8's for £1k or that kind of money if it goes wrong scrap it and buy another its many multiples cheaper than a Focus ST.
Good points. The main thing I think is that you can't really "baby" a rotary to get (say) 30mpg on a run. If my RX8 would do that, as my 350z will, then I think a lot of the moans about economy would be alleviated.

feef

5,209 posts

213 months

ging84

9,548 posts

176 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
in 10 years time a small wankel engine will be almost standard equipment in electric vehicles

matchmaker

9,058 posts

230 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
ging84 said:
in 10 years time a small wankel engine will be almost standard equipment in electric vehicles
Then they wouldn't be electric vehicles...

underphil

1,353 posts

240 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
they don't make for economical cars because they aren't efficient under partial load

- but are actually very efficient at high load & rpm, combined with their compact size it makes them the ideal range-extender engine for hybrid vehicles

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

228 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
underphil said:
they don't make for economical cars because they aren't efficient under partial load

- but are actually very efficient at high load & rpm, combined with their compact size it makes them the ideal range-extender engine for hybrid vehicles
Does anyone have stats on that for the tear Mazda won Le Mans? Was better economy one of the key aspects to beat opposition that year?

otolith

69,105 posts

234 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
vikingaero said:
I'm on the other side of the fence on this. Look at the values of 2nd hand RX8's and see the reason why - the wankel engine.

I currently have a Clubman but would have seriously considered a 2.0T or V6 RX8 for one reason - longevity.
I wouldn't, I would probably have ended up with a 3-series coupe instead - the only aspects in which the RX-8 is a better car than that derive from the choice of engine.