Die GATSO, DIE!
Author
Discussion

parrot of doom

Original Poster:

23,075 posts

263 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
This has made my day:



Hmmm, not much to see there - hang on, lets get closer...





























Wait, could that be.........




































Oh noes! Disaster!








This is about the only time I'll buy a car thief a drink! Well done to you sir!

In fact, this raises an intriguing question - would there be a net benefit if instead of burning cars on fields, car thieves parked them under speed cameras, and burnt them there?

parrot of doom

Original Poster:

23,075 posts

263 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
btw its the A6144 near Carrington

chrisjl

787 posts

311 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Ha ha - I'll have to check that out on the way into work (eurgh!) tomorrow.
Do you know for sure that it was deliberate? I've seen a set of black tyre marks approaching a speedcam on the A34 that cross over as they arc towards a pile of broken glass and plastic on the grass verge - "speed cameras kill".

parrot of doom

Original Poster:

23,075 posts

263 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Oh its most definitely deliberate - no skid marks or anything, the tread marks drive straight into it from across the road, right up the kerb, and right up the column!

No chance of it being an accident AFAIK.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Woohoo

Any car thieves reading this, you heard the man, torch your ill gotten gains under a Gatso.... All car thieves are scum, but the least they could do is try to repay their debt to society constructively

No Discretion

655 posts

261 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Looks like it was positioned in a very good place...

Just near a junction etc etc.....

Let's hope nobody dies as a result....

tallbloke

10,376 posts

312 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
No Discretion said:
Looks like it was positioned in a very good place...

Just near a junction etc etc.....

Let's hope nobody dies as a result....


If it means people will be watching the road instead of their speedo, it won't be a problem.

TripleS

4,294 posts

271 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
No Discretion said:
Looks like it was positioned in a very good place...

Just near a junction etc etc.....

Let's hope nobody dies as a result....


Hello Gary, I trust you are well.

Aye, but it's positioned after the junction, and may serve to divert drivers' attention away from more important matters, such as possible movements around the junction itself. On balance I think removal of the camera is probably an improvement.

Best wishes all,
Dave.

gh0st

4,693 posts

287 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
No Discretion said:
Looks like it was positioned in a very good place...

Just near a junction etc etc.....

Let's hope nobody dies as a result....


Yes because speed kills

snigger

mmmmmmm

Sorry cant hold it...

BWAAAAHAAA HAAHAHAAHAHAHA

So how many people died at that junction THROUGH EXCESS SPEED ALONE before the camera was put in?

james_j

3,996 posts

284 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Yes, think of all the sudden death and destruction because there's no camera.

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
I assume that is a lay-by not a junction?

Odd place for a bus stop otherwise ...

TheExcession

11,669 posts

279 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
TripleS said:

Aye, but it's positioned after the junction, and may serve to divert drivers' attention away from more important matters, such as possible movements around the junction itself. On balance I think removal of the camera is probably an improvement.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Think you need to look a bit harder mate



There's a bus stop there too...

best
Ex

Roadcop

655 posts

261 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Even more of a reason not to be speeding past..!

DeltaFox

3,839 posts

261 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Roadcop said:
Even more of a reason not to be speeding past..!



In what way ? In excess of the limit or just inappropriate for conditions? Just whats a safe speed to travel at here? Or dont you know?


>> Edited by DeltaFox on Monday 3rd January 18:15

DeltaFox

3,839 posts

261 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Lol Mungo!

DeltaFox

3,839 posts

261 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Old one was defunct and needed turning into something readable..
Or would you like the old one back? Have a vote and let me know.

Roadcop

655 posts

261 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
mungo said:

Roadcop said:
Even more of a reason not to be speeding past..!




STOP CHANGING YOUR FRIGGING NAME!




Sorry..I just thought....No Discretion was a crap name....

Roadcop

655 posts

261 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
DeltaFox said:

Roadcop said:
Even more of a reason not to be speeding past..!




In what way ? In excess of the limit or just inappropriate for conditions? Just whats a safe speed to travel at here? Or dont you know?


>> Edited by DeltaFox on Monday 3rd January 18:15


I don't know

DeltaFox

3,839 posts

261 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Decided to take some time out so i had ted delete the old one.
Upon my re-emergence from my chrysalis-like state( nope i havent been incarcerated!) i found it impossible to register the old name, hence the new one.
Btw, hows the career going? Busted many heads?

Pies

13,116 posts

285 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
mungo said:

DeltaFox said:
Btw, hows the career going?




Good mate thanks - Incredibly busy though!


What doing