RE: Scamera detector supplier to sue government
RE: Scamera detector supplier to sue government
Wednesday 5th January 2005

Scamera detector supplier to sue government

Leave the law alone, says Car Parts Direct, or we take action


A radar detector supplier is claiming compensation from the government on behalf of motorists who use its device. The company is asking for up to £2m or a £100 per motorist. The company's move follows the proposal in last year's Road Safety Bill, to ban radar detectors -- though not GPS-based devices. PistonHeads covered the story last month (link below).

Mark Cornwall, boss of UK-based Car Parts Direct which has a five year agreement to supply the Quintezz XT7000 radar detector (right) here, has asked transport minister Alistair Darling to leave the law alone and allow motorists to continue to use their speed trap detection device.

Cornwall said, "Our radar detector does exactly what a speed camera is supposed to do - it advises a motorist to check their speed and keep within the limits of the law. It is a road safety device that has helped thousands of motorists keep their driving licence and avoided hefty speeding fines. Alistair Darling has demonstrated once again his greed for speed camera cash – road safety is just a feeble excuse to extort easy money from the motorist."

Cornwall said that his local MP had seen information from within the government showing conclusively that the only valid reason proposed for banning radar detectors was financial. The other reason the government put forward, said Cornwall, was technically incorrect. "They said that detectors set off supermarket door openers but of course it's the other way round."

Cornwall added that he will do everything possible to make sure the law remains unchanged. He said, “While ever there are speed cameras we will have huge demand – and we will also continue to supply the Quintezz and pay the cost of the £60 speeding ticket to our customers – it’s about the only defence the motorist has left against speed cameras.”

Mobile speed cameras are of course a huge source of government income. One police officer managed to give 329 tickets in five hours, raising nearly £20,000 in revenue, said Cornwall. Police overtime pay is regularly given to officers willing to carry out the mobile speed checks.

Cornwall caused outrage with the Government last year when he announced that any motorist using their device who is unfortunate enough to receive a speeding ticket would have the cost of their fine paid.

Cornwall said: “Any customer purchasing our Quintezz XT7000 Radar detector will have up to £100 refunded to them if the Government manages to ban the product within 12 months of purchase. We will then take action against Alistair Darling to recover the costs from the Government – and the Government fails to pay, further action will be taken through the European Court of Human Rights.”

PistonHeads' Road Safety Bill story: www.pistonheads.com/speed/default.asp?storyId=9581

Quintezz XT7000 Radar Detector: www.carparts-direct.co.uk

Author
Discussion

dunno

Original Poster:

59 posts

301 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Go get em Cornwall, direct action looks good instead of us all being done over by OUR *laughs* government...

james_j

3,996 posts

284 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Yes, show the government up for what they are: lying twisters forever hiding their true intention with spin and false moral high ground justification.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all


Anything that helps to dispel the governments lies about scameras is a good thing IMHO.

B 7 VP

633 posts

271 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
This MUST be the news, we have all been waiting for, isnt it??.Everyone waiting for "Someone else" to do Something--But-Someone else hasnt blinked.

Where do I send my £££ contribution, to the legal costs fund to take it all the way to to the European Court of Justice--that word is still recognised in the EU.

DeltaFox

3,839 posts

261 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Ill be buying from these guys in the near future to equip the batmobile.
Go get em! Oh and :1-digitraisedsmiley: to Darling.

ultimasimon

9,646 posts

287 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
B 7 VP said:
This MUST be the news, we have all been waiting for, isnt it??.Everyone waiting for "Someone else" to do Something--But-Someone else hasnt blinked.

Where do I send my £££ contribution, to the legal costs fund to take it all the way to to the European Court of Justice--that word is still recognised in the EU.





Good idea. I am sure that there would be many people who would donate to that cause. There would be plenty of the previously convicted motoring public who would probably want to, and this would be hundreds of thousands of people. A big march through London holding up traffic like the anti Iraq protests would do well IMO.

Well done to Mark Cornwall for standing up against the might of the government. Let's get this guy motivated and see where he can go with it. Not only is this government not happy with robbing hundreds of thousands of motorists, now they don't care if they are closing private companies down, which is adding to unemployment - that's a clever policy

Alistair Darling is the new Sherriff of Nottingham, it's official, and we are in desperate need of a Robin Hood. These policies are not working, and we all know that the government is not pulling in the same amount of revenue as it used to (ie Smoking Kills campaign which hit them very hard for lost revenue).

I wonder if someone will actually start a political movement against the government or whether this too quietly dissolves. Direct action is needed and I feel the softly softly campaigning political approach is not moving with enough pace, but something is better than nothing.

Maybe Mark Cornish should stand in local Government and see how he does? What happened to all that clap trap about the tories banning speed cameras if they got into power? He would get my vote anyhow

edited for spelling



>> Edited by ultimasimon on Wednesday 5th January 17:56

gsw500

656 posts

268 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Well done Mr Cornwall...
I will definately be fitting one of your Quintezzwotsits in the Yellow one.
As for Mr Darling Take that..

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Best of luck Mr Cornwall, how about a group buy for PHers?

DeltaFox

3,839 posts

261 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Better than that, why not make a donation towards his fighting fund?
God helps those that help themselves.

WillPeterson

38 posts

266 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Little chance of success imho, being as radar detectors are already banned/illegal in most EU countries.

Sgt^Roc

512 posts

278 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Well enufff said eh? but face it they will change the law, 10 years of failing road safety policies has not stop them now has it

ianwayne

8,543 posts

297 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Anyone considered staying within the speed limit?

DeltaFox

3,839 posts

261 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
ianwayne said:
Anyone considered staying within the speed limit?



Not an option.

supraman2954

3,241 posts

268 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
ianwayne said:
Anyone considered staying within the speed limit?

I would if they were set at something more sensible

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

289 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
WillPeterson said:
Little chance of success imho, being as radar detectors are already banned/illegal in most EU countries.


Isn't it laser that you have to watch out for around here these days?

Boosted.

rtp

30 posts

260 months

Wednesday 19th January 2005
quotequote all
The police have no regard for guidelines, neither do this government have any regard for law, unless it is to compensate convicted prisoners who sue because their beds are too hard or the clour tv is too high on the wall.
Refusal to attend court having written a letter saying that the camera was operated outside the guidelines may start a ruckus.
I like the tale that someone removed the numberplate froma police radar van and repetitively drove through their trap.