Is there a scam here?
Author
Discussion

Fidgits

Original Poster:

17,202 posts

260 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
Sold my car today.

Guy seemed nice enough.

Money transfered, no issues there.

Come to do the v5, says his family own a mot centre, and can he buy it as a trader so it doesn't add an owner, so he fills out the yellow part of the v5c for me to send off, takes the rest. I agree, but take extra details and a photo of his license incase of any police related issues that may arise (I.e. Speeding tickets on his drive home)

Get a text a few hours later, thanking me and saying he loves the car, but would I mind not sending the slip off until mid-jan, as that means he can get the January months road fund back.

Now it seems odd, and I can't see how waiting a couple of weeks changes him refunding the tax, the only difference is the reminder will come through to me, but if the v5 registers before the end of jan, he's liable for the tax.

Is there a scam here I'm missing?

pherlopolus

2,189 posts

189 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
he is probably planning a bank job.

I'd send it off, I'm sure there is some law about notification of change of keeper.

anothernameitist

1,500 posts

166 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
i'd look at the new tax disc rules on change of ownership. he has and he knows how to "play" them.

Its the DVLA who you will ultimely answer to and pay any fine to as well not him.

Better give him a heads up too

Terminator X

20,916 posts

235 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
New owner has to tax car straight away these days, there are no refunds to the new owner.

TX.

Bellatrix

139 posts

165 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
Tell him you have already posted your part of the V5.

Slidingpillar

761 posts

167 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
Bellatrix said:
Tell him you have already posted your part of the V5.
That's got to be the way out of the situation.

DuraAce

4,272 posts

191 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
Tell him it's already in the post.

Where do you think any speeding or parking tickets will be coming to if you haven't notified the DVLA?

paintman

7,860 posts

221 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
He can't get any tax back.
The tax on it when you sell the car effectively ceases at that point & as soon as you notify them DVLA send a cheque for any remainder which will be payable to you as the registered keeper. The later you notify DVLA the less you will get back.
I suspect he is trying to avoid having to tax the car for December.

(We've recently scrapped a car. Took it to the breakers on the Monday, wrote to DVLA enclosing a copy of the Certificate of Destruction the same day & received a cheque on the Saturday.)

Edited by paintman on Wednesday 24th December 16:58

Sifly

572 posts

209 months

Thursday 25th December 2014
quotequote all
Sounds like he's a Trader and has bought the car to sell on for a profit. No big deal provided your happy with the price you received for it.
Once you post the yellow slip (the trade form), he becomes responsible for the vehicle but doesn't officially become an owner of the vehicle.
Any offenses or tickets 'should' go to him once the DVLA have received the yellow form from you, but I would keep a copy of it with his details
just in case, at least until the DVLA send you the ownership change confirmation.

If the car was taxed before 1st October 2014, the tax will stay with the car as the old system (unless you surrender the disc to claim back any full months).
Any vehicle taxed on or after the 1st October needs to be re-taxed (or SORN) by the new owner from date of sale.


mph1977

12,467 posts

199 months

Thursday 25th December 2014
quotequote all
Sifly said:
<snip>

If the car was taxed before 1st October 2014, the tax will stay with the car as the old system (unless you surrender the disc to claim back any full months).
Any vehicle taxed on or after the 1st October needs to be re-taxed (or SORN) by the new owner from date of sale.
NO

Sifly

572 posts

209 months

Thursday 25th December 2014
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
Sifly said:
<snip>

If the car was taxed before 1st October 2014, the tax will stay with the car as the old system (unless you surrender the disc to claim back any full months).
Any vehicle taxed on or after the 1st October needs to be re-taxed (or SORN) by the new owner from date of sale.
NO
Feel free to correct me

mph1977

12,467 posts

199 months

Thursday 25th December 2014
quotequote all
Sifly said:
mph1977 said:
Sifly said:
<snip>

If the car was taxed before 1st October 2014, the tax will stay with the car as the old system (unless you surrender the disc to claim back any full months).
Any vehicle taxed on or after the 1st October needs to be re-taxed (or SORN) by the new owner from date of sale.
NO
Feel free to correct me
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/vehicle-tax-changes

"From 1 October, when you buy a vehicle, the vehicle tax will no longer be transferred with the vehicle. You will need to get new vehicle tax before you can use the vehicle.|"

as discussed ad nauseum here and other car related forums plus publicised in the press ...

Sifly

572 posts

209 months

Thursday 25th December 2014
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
Sifly said:
mph1977 said:
Sifly said:
<snip>

If the car was taxed before 1st October 2014, the tax will stay with the car as the old system (unless you surrender the disc to claim back any full months).
Any vehicle taxed on or after the 1st October needs to be re-taxed (or SORN) by the new owner from date of sale.
NO
Feel free to correct me
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/vehicle-tax-changes

"From 1 October, when you buy a vehicle, the vehicle tax will no longer be transferred with the vehicle. You will need to get new vehicle tax before you can use the vehicle.|"

as discussed ad nauseum here and other car related forums plus publicised in the press ...
Ok, I stand corrected! :0)

iandc

3,893 posts

237 months

Friday 26th December 2014
quotequote all
as the topic suggests this is a scam by HMG to gain extra revenue by double taxing for the month of ownership change!

mph1977

12,467 posts

199 months

Friday 26th December 2014
quotequote all
iandc said:
as the topic suggests this is a scam by HMG to gain extra revenue by double taxing for the month of ownership change!
which happened on a reasonably frequent basis anyway unless people agreed to sell on the remaining VED ...

anonymous-user

85 months

Friday 26th December 2014
quotequote all
Sifly said:
...

Once you post the yellow slip (the trade form), he becomes responsible for the vehicle but doesn't officially become an owner of the vehicle...
Incorrect. The trader bought the car. He now owns it. There is a distinction between being the registered keeper of a car and being the owner of a car, and keeper and owner they don't have to be the same person. If the trader doesn't now own the car, who does? Not the OP, that's for sure, do who else? Also, what do you mean by "offically ...owner". How can you "unofficially" own something? Answer: you can't. There is no "official" about it. You either own something or you don't.*



* I leave aside the presently irrelevant distinction between legal and beneficial onwnership.

anonymous-user

85 months

Friday 26th December 2014
quotequote all
PS: In the UK, we commit offences, not offenses.

Only in a few circumstances does a person become liable to prosecution simply because he or she is registered keeper of a vehicle, and you can't generally be held liable for speeding etc. committed by someone else; but if you don't rapidly tell DVLA of a change of keeper you may get hassle, as other people's vehicular naughtinesses may result in you having to deal with tedious paperwork, and, even worse, you may stress us out here by posting up egregious OMG TICKET OF DOOM BUT IT WASNAE ME threads, so disturbing our restful slumbers.

In any event it's an offence not to tell DVLA pronto.

BertBert

21,316 posts

242 months

Friday 26th December 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
PS: In the UK, we commit offences, not offenses.
So there lies an intrigue. Just because offense is what the yanks use, does it actually mean it's incorrect in our English? After all it has its etymology in English and Latin (offensus).
Bert

mph1977

12,467 posts

199 months

Friday 26th December 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Sifly said:
...

Once you post the yellow slip (the trade form), he becomes responsible for the vehicle but doesn't officially become an owner of the vehicle...
Incorrect. The trader bought the car. He now owns it. There is a distinction between being the registered keeper of a car and being the owner of a car, and keeper and owner they don't have to be the same person. If the trader doesn't now own the car, who does? Not the OP, that's for sure, do who else? Also, what do you mean by "offically ...owner". How can you "unofficially" own something? Answer: you can't. There is no "official" about it. You either own something or you don't.*



* I leave aside the presently irrelevant distinction between legal and beneficial onwnership.
me thinks that sifly was confusing

'owner'
'keeper listed on the v5 '
' keeper by virtue of being a trader meaning it doesn;t increment the V5 no of keepers and still shows the last none trade keeper name and address'

Fer

7,778 posts

311 months

Friday 26th December 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
PS: In the UK, we commit offences, not offenses.
Do we have to?