CVT transmissions - are they that bad?
CVT transmissions - are they that bad?
Author
Discussion

EK993

Original Poster:

1,957 posts

281 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
Can't drive the Jag through the winter so want to get a day to day car to get to the office etc. Considering a Subaru (maybe a Crosstrek), want an automatic though, I just don't enjoy manual cars anymore.

The only automatic option Subaru offer is CVT. Have heard some pretty disparaging things about them - anyone with a CVT car care to give a real life opinion?

M4cruiser

5,226 posts

180 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
That's a pretty open question .. it depends on the model, they are so different.
I think you'd need to drive that specific one and decide if it suits you.

Personally I've driven a few different ones and I like them, when they work but not when they jerk.

Faulty ones are a pain.


Welshbeef

49,633 posts

228 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
Junk IMHO.

Well a friend had a Primera GT W reg era anytime you put the right foot down it just sat at 5.(-6k revs everywhere loads of noise for little acceleration.

Real disappointment - never driven any other CVT so could be a bad example.



In theory they are great they hold at peak torque for max economy or peak power for max acceleration.

DuraAce

4,272 posts

190 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
Drive one and see what you think...

I'd never have one in a million years. Awful contraptions IMO.

EK993

Original Poster:

1,957 posts

281 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
Yes will definitely drive one - want to get opinions from those that own them as it may seem OK on a test drive but turn out to be horrible when living with it in real life.

Claudia Skies

1,098 posts

146 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
Nissan have got CVT very well developed.

Drive one, and I bet you'll think it was just an "ordinary" automatic.

DSLiverpool

16,532 posts

232 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
I have one now, murano V6 and had a Lexus GS common to both is imperceptible limo like gear change however if you don't want to cruise / drive normally you won't like it.
The satisfying surge when an auto changes or kicks down isn't there but apart from that I think it's great within my statement above.

EK993

Original Poster:

1,957 posts

281 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
DSLiverpool said:
I have one now, murano V6 and had a Lexus GS common to both is imperceptible limo like gear change however if you don't want to cruise / drive normally you won't like it.
The satisfying surge when an auto changes or kicks down isn't there but apart from that I think it's great within my statement above.
Yes its for mundane normal driving, mostly in the bad weather we get here (snow etc) - I already have something for spirited driving.

markc123

50 posts

188 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
I had a volvo 340DL. It had a pair of rubber bands for a transmission.

From 0-30 from the lights it was hilarious. Easily beat things from the 90's with real gearboxes.

In conclusion, I have nothing to say of use.

Codswallop

5,259 posts

224 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
As DSLiverpool mentioned, it's fine for pootling, but I was not keen on the rubber band delay when you asked for brisk acceleration. It was rubbish for spirited driving, but did okay otherwise. Not keen on the weird engine sounds that it causes though (hanging the revs for example).

gazza285

11,218 posts

238 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
markc123 said:
I had a volvo 340DL. It had a pair of rubber bands for a transmission.

From 0-30 from the lights it was hilarious. Easily beat things from the 90's with real gearboxes.

In conclusion, I have nothing to say of use.
Important question though, how fast was it in reverse?

markc123

50 posts

188 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
gazza285 said:
Important question though, how fast was it in reverse?
I don't know. And now I have to live with that realisation.

Robert Elise

958 posts

175 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
CVT is perfect for pootling. My rav4 has it, suits the car and way a soft-roader should be driven perfectly. Smooth and efficient.
It isn't any good for spirited driving, but then slush-box equivalents aren't either. Modern ones come with flappy paddles, pseudo-gears and sport mode should you want to overtake or press on. I use the paddles about twice a year, it's not a sports car. Fit for purpose.

bstark

204 posts

163 months

Saturday 3rd January 2015
quotequote all
I had an Audi A4 TDi with their CVT as a company car for a while and in most circumstances it was brilliant.

Lots of low down torque so it just felt effortless and refined most of the time.

Where it fell down was if you drove it at more than 7/10ths in auto mode and expected it to feel sporty - it always felt like it had a slipping clutch in those circumstances. I ended up using the pretend manual 'gears' if I wanted to get a move on and then it felt ok.

I think a lot depends on the characteristics of the engine the cvt box is fitted to.

lufbramatt

5,689 posts

164 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Claudia Skies said:
Nissan have got CVT very well developed.

Drive one, and I bet you'll think it was just an "ordinary" automatic.
Yep- we had a Nissan Altima with a CVT while we were in California earlier this year. Was genuinely surprised to find out it had a CVT when I googled it after we got home. Had a sort of "steptronic" type mode with 5 discrete ratios so you could avoid the rubber band effect. Drove fine, although when in normal mode it was a bit lethargic at times when it fussed about adjusting the revs and ratios to achieve some sort of acceleration. Not as nice to drive as the ZF slushbox in my E39 but the engine was a 2.5 4cyl so it was always going to be a bit rough.

However, lot of horror stories about reliability. Same goes for the Audi CVT 'boxes.

Robert Elise

958 posts

175 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
However, lot of horror stories about reliability. Same goes for the Audi CVT 'boxes.
actually there aren't. google it and you find very horror stories for modern CVTs.
There were some horrors a decade ago (Murano comes to mind) but on google now you'll just find the same few stories being repeated on forums.
I've no doubt any faults would be very expensive, another reason not to treat it like a sports car as i suspect sudden inertia changes could build up issues over time. I'm not advocating you buy a CVT as a hard-driving 300k mile car, but the OP wanted a winter auto to potter around in.
My own will struggle to reach 60k in 10 years so i was happy to take the risk.

doubleRr

13 posts

141 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Currently drive a moped with CVT transmission and it is pretty good if you just cruise, not for racing tho.

Gareth79

9,112 posts

276 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
Yep- we had a Nissan Altima with a CVT while we were in California earlier this year. Was genuinely surprised to find out it had a CVT when I googled it after we got home. Had a sort of "steptronic" type mode with 5 discrete ratios so you could avoid the rubber band effect. Drove fine, although when in normal mode it was a bit lethargic at times when it fussed about adjusting the revs and ratios to achieve some sort of acceleration. Not as nice to drive as the ZF slushbox in my E39 but the engine was a 2.5 4cyl so it was always going to be a bit rough.

However, lot of horror stories about reliability. Same goes for the Audi CVT 'boxes.
I drove a Nissan Rogue (Qashqai) rental and it was "OK" but had an abysmal drone at a certain rpm (such that you cannot hear what a passenger is saying). I was about to return it as defective but I googled the symptoms and found it was just a known thing about that model, I think there was talk of a class action lawsuit.

Huff

3,437 posts

221 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
We had a Honda Civic Hybrid as an office pool car for 5yrs until v. recently.

A car I'd love to have loved in principle, but it was feotid. And the CVT implementation, while 100% reliable, was a large part of that: the only car I've ever had more fun in by driving as slowly as poss.


CB2152

1,555 posts

163 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
A friend's father had a Lexus RX400H which has a CVT. Worked quite well on that car as a hybrid, there being loads of torque available instantly, and the transmission making the most of the petrol/electric combo under hard acceleration. It was actually genuinely fast from 0-40 where the engine and the motors were working at their best. I think we timed 0-40 using a V Box device at something like 2.5 seconds on a good day. It was very impressive.