Practical Performance Car feature
Practical Performance Car feature
Author
Discussion

prideaux

Original Poster:

4,974 posts

175 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all

MAGAZINE REVIEW Practical Performance Car Magazine
The Magazine that encourages the Destruction of Classic Cars
If you have a Classic British Car languishing in your garage and you want to destroy it rather than restore it this publication is right up your street you can find out about how others destroyed there Classic car and even how to Destroy your every day driver and should your manhood be lacking like most of the editorial team then you will fined Exhausts that will be so large and loud no one will notice that lack of a packet your missing.
You have all heard of Practical Classic Magazine well this is what you get when they move on to pastures new and forget to take a Map


Edited by prideaux on Tuesday 6th January 17:09

crosseyedlion

2,380 posts

224 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Perhaps they should spend less time making generalisations about a passionate bunch of undeniable petrolheads and spend more time actually writing decent articles about cars, rather than seemingly using the magazine as a ruse to pay for their projects.

They sound a little bitter that TVR owners are frequently out enjoying their vehicles, as opposed to what they can do with their unfinished (usually dull) projects.

I stopped reading it years ago, got fed up with reading patronising how-to articles on how to run mapped ignition on some small engined car that'll always be slow. If you're going to do it, you research properly for your specific application.

2 hours spent on 'Readers Car's' here is far more interesting than 80% of PPC's content.


alex_gray255

6,337 posts

231 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Ah, another well researched article on TVRs and those who drive them by a popular and well supported magazine whose forum is full of life... not... biggrin

Won't be the last...

And if they write articles on the Morris Minor as a performance car, I'm sure I wouldn't want to read it either.



Edited by alex_gray255 on Monday 5th January 00:06

mk1fan

10,871 posts

251 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
There's a few women who drive TVRs. Carried tools and furniture in my TVRs. Not sure how much more practical a classic needs to be.

Goaty Bill 2

3,587 posts

145 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
I've often looked at that magazine on the shelf, and often thought 'that article might be interesting...'
I certainly shall not even bother looking in the future.

The smug, narrow minded arrogance of the pinhead that wrote that is incredible.
The short sighted editor that would allow that sort of bigoted bullst into 'his/her' magazine is even more stunning.
Perhaps for them it is 'normal', but now I will never know.

ukdj

1,004 posts

210 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Two sides to every coin,

I see no mention of the article later on in that issue regarding the bargain that are TVR "wedges" or indeed the coverage of the rally de jonquilles a couple of issues ago featuring a PH'er Cerbera all of which were very positive.

Over the issues there are some serious contributions from the likes of Dave Walker & many others to balance the "Top Gear" tomfoolery of articles like the "Top 10"

Is there a perfect automotive magazine that doesn't offend/annoy anyone for whatever reason ?

crosseyedlion

2,380 posts

224 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
ukdj said:
Is there a perfect automotive magazine that doesn't offend/annoy anyone for whatever reason ?
No but its a bit like Retro Ford magazine laying into Mustang drivers. It just doesn't make sense to offend a portion of car enthusiasts which are likely to be in the same demographic as the readership and likely to be part of it.

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

166 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Not enough beards, tank tops and running-like-a-sewing-machine for their liking?

slippery

14,093 posts

265 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
I thought the article was quite fair. smile

Rochester TVR

3,314 posts

232 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
ukdj said:
the coverage of the rally de jonquilles a couple of issues ago featuring a PH'er Cerbera all of which were very positive.
thumbup

(Must get round to ordering a couple of back issues!)

spitfire4v8

4,024 posts

207 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
This "article" is one of many reasons I don't subscribe to PPC any more.
The PPC team will be at Autosport if any of you fancy giving them a piece of your mind wink

matt-man

2,667 posts

245 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
I love revving my car in tunnels and spending hours on pH... smile

Best to leave the PPC t%$$ers to it!

Edited by matt-man on Monday 5th January 21:07

prideaux

Original Poster:

4,974 posts

175 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Maybe if we see copies of the useless waste of paper sitting on a news stand just move it and pop the copies behind the Womans weekly that will help there readership
A

portzi

2,328 posts

201 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
slippery said:
I thought the article was quite fair. smile
Unfortunately there is a very small minority of TVR owners who fit the description in the article. I know you can say this about afew marques and their owners but with TVR and our loud and shouter cars in some cases its true frown.

Edited by portzi on Monday 5th January 21:38

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

158 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
The author appears to believe that most contributors to PH are TVR owners.

Kitchski

6,549 posts

257 months

Tuesday 6th January 2015
quotequote all
portzi said:
slippery said:
I thought the article was quite fair. smile
Unfortunately there is a very small minority of TVR owners who fit the description in the article. I know you can say this about afew marques and their owners but with TVR and our loud and shouter cars in some cases its true frown.

Edited by portzi on Monday 5th January 21:38
As you say, you could highlight weak links in any marque-following. It's just a load of rubbish, purely opinions from the 'author'.
Of course, it might just be be something to provoke reactions and gain some publicity for a failing magazine. Any publicity is good publicity, as they say.















They might have a point on the flip paint though, it was cool for about 5 mins in 2001 hehe



Edited by Kitchski on Tuesday 6th January 09:48

magpies

5,193 posts

208 months

Tuesday 6th January 2015
quotequote all
It is not an 'article' as such - it is a general piss take at lots of different ownwers and very tongue in cheek. Seems to have taken a few of 'us' hook line and sinker.

There is an article further in regarding Wedges and that has a positive slant.

griff 200

509 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
While I have not read the said offending article I would like to say I have had many a dealing with Dave walker he has set up a good few engines for me and his services are top class and so is his knowledge of tuning etc and also a really nice bloke !!!! My boys and I have had several cars in the mag and found the editorial team again good to deal with this was some time ago perhaps it's changed ??? Richard

bxlbaz

383 posts

177 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
I suppose the article was there to sell magazines, let's not confuse that with a fact based opinion. The guys are probably nice lads doing the best job for their owners.
But yes it does bloody grate