Tag Wt1110
Author
Discussion

Melchett

Original Poster:

822 posts

217 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
So, after trying find a Tag CT1110 for the last year I finally gave up when I was strolling down the high street and saw a WT1110 (the non chrono version of the CT) tucked away in the shop window. I popped in, not expecting much, but it turned out that it had the original boxes and papers and was originally purchased from an AD just 50 yds away. I snapped it up straight away.

It's in really good condition and the more I wear it, the more I like it. I'll get it serviced soon, but for now, I'll just keep wearing it. Well chuffed.

ImDesigner

1,961 posts

225 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
Congratulations. Any pics?

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
Why do people insist on calling TAG Heuer watches 'Tag'?

Variomatic

2,392 posts

192 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Why do people insist on calling TAG Heuer watches 'Tag'?
Generally one of 2 reasons:

(1) They don't understand the relative parts that Tag and Heuer played historically (ie: investment company and watch company respectively), so don't see anything wrong with using the "obvious" shorthand

(2) They do realise the relative parts that tag and Heuer played historically, and have strong enough views on what Tag have done to Heuer over the years that they wouldn't contaminate the venerable name of Heuer by associating it with the comparative dross that's been produced by tag

Most come under the first category, I suspect at least one poster round here comes under the second tongue out

clockworks

7,793 posts

176 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
I'll go with "2", but capitalise the whole "word".
Not a great fan of TAG watches, but I do own one - a Targa Florio reissue that I found in a sale at half price.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
I disagree Joe!

Technigues d'Avant Garde were good custodians: they saved the company, invested, and Heuer grew. LVHM are the villains here.

Variomatic

2,392 posts

192 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
GC8 said:
I disagree Joe!

Technigues d'Avant Garde were good custodians: they saved the company, invested, and Heuer grew. LVHM are the villains here.
Agreed to a point - they certainly kept the name alive.

But, even in the early days, seeing things like the F1 (perfectly capable and well made quartz watches in their own right) carrying the name Heuer was offensive to many.

Bear in mind that this was still just about the tail end of the quartz revolution. You could still buy sub £10 mechanicals as day-to-day wear and a lot of serious watch enthusiasts still saw anything quartz as the work of Satan.

And then they went and made a cut-price plastic version!!!!

Melchett

Original Poster:

822 posts

217 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Why do people insist on calling TAG Heuer watches 'Tag'?
Pure laziness on my part. Does that answer your question?

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
Not really. What about everyone else?

reggie747

300 posts

158 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Why do people insist on calling TAG Heuer watches 'Tag'?
Damn, some people are touchy......

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

227 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Not really. What about everyone else?
Might be a good idea for a thread wink y'know instead of hijacking someone else's.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
I have contributed more than you, so far.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

227 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
GC8 said:
I have contributed more than you, so far & can wee further than yourself. How do you spell "nerrr nerrr na nerr nerrr" by the way? Oh & Porsche 924s are basically the best thing since sliced bread & if you disagree, well I'll send my dad round, 'cos he's bigger than yours.
Err, ok thumbup

SVS

3,824 posts

302 months

Monday 19th January 2015
quotequote all
It's amazing how the tone gets lowered as soon as somebody mentions the 'T' word.

I think the TAG haters have multiplied and even outnumber the Rolex haters now ...

Melchett

Original Poster:

822 posts

217 months

Monday 19th January 2015
quotequote all
And here it is:


hornetrider

63,161 posts

236 months

Monday 19th January 2015
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Not really. What about everyone else?
Pure laziness on my part.

Variomatic

2,392 posts

192 months

Monday 19th January 2015
quotequote all
Melchett said:
And here it is:
Nice smile

Incidentally, regardless of my earlier comments, I quite like TAG Heuer in that era and some of their newer production are worthy watches. My only real problem is with the mid-range quartz stuff, using sub-£20 movements, that's priced as if it was something really special.

I've got nothing against names carrying a premium, but when almost the whole of the price is "name" someone's taking the piss!

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Monday 19th January 2015
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
GC8 said:
I have contributed more than you, so far & can wee further than yourself. How do you spell "nerrr nerrr na nerr nerrr" by the way? Oh & Porsche 924s are basically the best thing since sliced bread & if you disagree, well I'll send my dad round, 'cos he's bigger than yours.
Err, ok thumbup
NEVER drink and type... hehe