Airshows
Author
Discussion

richard36

Original Poster:

13,739 posts

286 months

Friday 2nd August 2002
quotequote all
In view of recent un-scheduled aerobatic displays,the most recent of which,( just of shore )at Lowerstoft.Will we the public be able to look forward to such events in the coming years, or will only the shelling of our redundant frigates have to be enjoyed by TV

Paceracing

729 posts

286 months

Friday 2nd August 2002
quotequote all
I can't see them stopping airshows, there would need to be a worldwide ban for it to be effective, as there would be too many pro-display groups who would kick up a big fuss it it was threatened. Don't forget that the Farnborough Airshow's main objective is for this government to make a few quid from the arms export trade!

Re. The Lowestoft GR7 Harrier incident, that pilot was very on-the-ball. He knew the Harrier was in a non-survivable situation milliseconds after it started to loose altitude, and with only about 100ft to play with he punched out. Once again the Martin Baker ejector seat has saved someones life. He lost a £20M plane, but at least he is entitled to wear the ejected pilots club tie!
Shame to loose such a cool plane though.

Jas

>> Edited by Paceracing on Friday 2nd August 19:50

nevpugh308

4,432 posts

289 months

Tuesday 6th August 2002
quotequote all
Wonder if they'll bring it up, and put it back into service. It can't be in that deep a water to recover it.

Surely a new engine and a bit of electrics will sort it out ? (hmm .... sounds like most TVR's .... sorry ! )

castex

5,029 posts

293 months

Tuesday 6th August 2002
quotequote all
I'm sure i saw the pilot giving a cheery wave (thumbs up?!) from his seat as he parachuted into the drink. Nice for onlookers to know he was okay, but he looked a bit chuffed with himself for someone who had just written off one of those lovely planes.

apache

39,731 posts

304 months

Tuesday 6th August 2002
quotequote all
probably just chuffed not to be dead....bet he cakked himself......100 feet up and then no thrust! I'd like to know what caused it cos the engine sounded ok

billb

3,198 posts

285 months

Tuesday 6th August 2002
quotequote all
lucky it didnt explode as he seemed to land straight back on top of it!!

yum

529 posts

293 months

Tuesday 6th August 2002
quotequote all
A Harrier is single engined, and as soon as it loses powere there is no alternative but to eject. they don't glide well, especially from the hover, and you wouldn't want to be there when it hits the ground.

Bear in mind that ejecting also brings serious danger to the pilot. Many seats are zero-zero rated (ie will work at zero airspeed, zero height) so they have to be very powerful. Ejection brings risk of hitting the canopy, being fired into the ground, losing your knees on the instrument panel, compressing your vertebrae etc.

Not to be done lightly.

R

Paceracing

729 posts

286 months

Wednesday 7th August 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Ejection brings risk of losing your knees on the instrument panel,

I understand this was a particularly common occurence with Lightning Pilots in the 1960's and 1970's.

Jas.

pdv6

16,442 posts

281 months

Wednesday 7th August 2002
quotequote all
Hence the most important 'size' factor for fighter jet pilots is not their height, but their thigh length. Too long in the thigh and you're off to the Hercules squadron.

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Wednesday 7th August 2002
quotequote all
Modern designs reduce the risk of losing the knees (or taking the dash with you), and canopy failures (or going through it) are also quite rare.

However, due to the immense thrust created by pulling the handle, the vast majority of users will suffer spinal compression - which having interviewed several pilots (I did a study on ejector seats at Uni) is bloody painful... but as someone said - nice tie.

richard36

Original Poster:

13,739 posts

286 months

Thursday 8th August 2002
quotequote all
Bit embarassing though all the same, I mean the fact that he may done how many hundreds of hours on these aircraft and yet comes to grief in front of his home crowd and in full view of everybody and their camcorders

MoJocvh

16,837 posts

282 months

Thursday 8th August 2002
quotequote all
Glad he got out though, seem to remember, during a royal review, a harrier (GR1 I think) display pilot did his bit then a bit more as he set his zero/zero seat off after finishing the display and was back on the chocks on the ground.
Pity he was climbing out at the time.
Messy.

>> Edited by MoJocvh on Thursday 8th August 21:24

JMorgan

36,010 posts

304 months

Thursday 8th August 2002
quotequote all
I seem to remember a program on the Vulcan bomber which said that during testing a crew had to eject a speed. Some were hit by the tail fin and hurt/killed. So they went for chucking some out the bottom?
Used to go down St Athan as a nipper and oggle the V bombers and they made a great show in the displays.

yertis

19,447 posts

286 months

Friday 9th August 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Glad he got out though, seem to remember, during a royal review, a harrier (GR1 I think) display pilot did his bit then a bit more as he set his zero/zero seat off after finishing the display and was back on the chocks on the ground.
Pity he was climbing out at the time.
Messy.

>> Edited by MoJocvh on Thursday 8th August 21:24




I saw this happen (maybe a different incident) at Yeovilton Airshow in 1975. Poor sod. Then the next year year, at the same place, I watched a German F104 (and pilot) fall out of the sky like a piece of lead pipe. Strangely, didn't affect my ambition to fly fast jets.

richard36

Original Poster:

13,739 posts

286 months

Friday 9th August 2002
quotequote all
A friend of mine works on amongst other, Concord, does something technical with the electronics. and he said the original test aircraft had a port or escape hatch behind the cockpit in case of embarrasing crash type scenario. he also said that up untill really quite recent years there were VALVE in the electronics...

yum

529 posts

293 months

Friday 9th August 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Strangely, didn't affect my ambition to fly fast jets.



And do you?

anonymous-user

74 months

Friday 9th August 2002
quotequote all
quote:

I seem to remember a program on the Vulcan bomber which said that during testing a crew had to eject a speed. Some were hit by the tail fin and hurt/killed. So they went for chucking some out the bottom?
Used to go down St Athan as a nipper and oggle the V bombers and they made a great show in the displays.


----------------------------------------

The Vulcan had ejector seats in the pilot & co pilot positions, but the rearward facing navigators & bomb aimers(3 in total) had to escape via the hatch underneath.
I've been in the Vulcan at Southend, there is an open day on the 31st of this month I think.

I also saw the Harrier that crashed, at Southend airshow earlier this year.
It was recovered yesterday and there is a picture in todays Mirror.The nose has broken off/nearly detached but the rest of the airframe doesn't look that bad.

Lee

funkynige

9,649 posts

295 months

Friday 9th August 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Wonder if they'll bring it up, and put it back into service. It can't be in that deep a water to recover it.



Not likely

>> Edited by funkynige on Friday 9th August 23:45

yum

529 posts

293 months

Saturday 10th August 2002
quotequote all
Never mind. Another £15m down the drain.

Still, look on the bright side, BLiar has decided to scrap the seaborne harrier force anyway so that's one less to look after in the meantime.

richard36

Original Poster:

13,739 posts

286 months

Saturday 10th August 2002
quotequote all
The Blurb and I quote;
Primary function, Attack-destroy (drop like a stone & sink.
Alternatively;60's TV series "Voyage to the bottom of the sea"
Gung -ho leather jacket'ed pilot/captain plunging from the skies in his sleek craft effortless transition from air to sea bourne craft.
Ring any bells with any of you out there??

>> Edited by richard36 on Saturday 10th August 14:12