Speed Camera - margin?
Author
Discussion

daemon

Original Poster:

40,169 posts

228 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
Came through a speed camera van speed check this morning at 43mph on the sat nav, and 45mph on the speedo in a 40.

Whats their margin there before they'll do you?

I'm hoping 10%?


agtlaw

7,417 posts

237 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all


Edited by agtlaw on Saturday 28th February 11:43

daemon

Original Poster:

40,169 posts

228 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
Cheers much appreciated.

ging84

9,548 posts

177 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
this chart really should be in a sticky thread

mgrays

189 posts

221 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
That table is not for Scotland where education is not desirable it seems... so no classes, straight to 3 pts/fine.

covboy

2,593 posts

205 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Still only "guidelines" though . Many on here will treat it as gospel.

tapereel

1,860 posts

147 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
mgrays said:
That table is not for Scotland where education is not desirable it seems... so no classes, straight to 3 pts/fine.
Scotland has its own guidance

Kyodo

754 posts

155 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
covboy said:
Still only "guidelines" though . Many on here will treat it as gospel.
True. On a speed awareness course my wife was told the legal limit is exactly that. There was someone on her course for doing 32 in a 30. Hopefully the police show a little discretion and static cameras are set slightly high (?) to account for discrepancies.

SS2.

14,712 posts

269 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Kyodo said:
There was someone on her course for doing 32 in a 30.
Allegedly.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

286 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
SS2. said:
Kyodo said:
There was someone on her course for doing 32 in a 30.
Allegedly.
Former Chief Con of South Yorkshire (the one who was done for 90-ish by Brunstrom's lot) set a number of South Yorkshire cameras to trigger at 32.

I thought this was a rumour until I met three people who had a fixed penalty for 32.

SS2.

14,712 posts

269 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Did you see the NIPs / FPNs ?

agtlaw

7,417 posts

237 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Former Chief Con of South Yorkshire (the one who was done for 90-ish by Brunstrom's lot) set a number of South Yorkshire cameras to trigger at 32.

I thought this was a rumour until I met three people who had a fixed penalty for 32.
32 mph speeding tickets are a bit like Bigfoot. There's anecdotal evidence to suggest that they exist, but nobody has ever produced any proof.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

286 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
mybrainhurts said:
Former Chief Con of South Yorkshire (the one who was done for 90-ish by Brunstrom's lot) set a number of South Yorkshire cameras to trigger at 32.

I thought this was a rumour until I met three people who had a fixed penalty for 32.
32 mph speeding tickets are a bit like Bigfoot. There's anecdotal evidence to suggest that they exist, but nobody has ever produced any proof.
These were three unconnected middle aged/pensioner men and women who had little interest in driving. When queried, all were adamant it was 32 and all were pretty well pissed off.

Beyond that I can offer no proof, but they're not the kind of people I would doubt.

agtlaw

7,417 posts

237 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
These were three unconnected middle aged/pensioner men and women who had little interest in driving. When queried, all were adamant it was 32 and all were pretty well pissed off.

Beyond that I can offer no proof, but they're not the kind of people I would doubt.
I don't doubt that you were told 32 or that those people thought it was 32. I've heard the same thing from various clients but when I receive the case papers - 35 or 36.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

286 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
mybrainhurts said:
These were three unconnected middle aged/pensioner men and women who had little interest in driving. When queried, all were adamant it was 32 and all were pretty well pissed off.

Beyond that I can offer no proof, but they're not the kind of people I would doubt.
I don't doubt that you were told 32 or that those people thought it was 32. I've heard the same thing from various clients but when I receive the case papers - 35 or 36.
Why did they do that?

agtlaw

7,417 posts

237 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Why did they do that?
People make mistakes.

tapereel

1,860 posts

147 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Kyodo said:
covboy said:
Still only "guidelines" though . Many on here will treat it as gospel.
True. On a speed awareness course my wife was told the legal limit is exactly that. There was someone on her course for doing 32 in a 30. Hopefully the police show a little discretion and static cameras are set slightly high (?) to account for discrepancies.
There wasn't.

mybrainhurts said:
Former Chief Con of South Yorkshire (the one who was done for 90-ish by Brunstrom's lot) set a number of South Yorkshire cameras to trigger at 32.

I thought this was a rumour until I met three people who had a fixed penalty for 32.
He didn't.
agtlaw said:
People make mistakes.
They sure do...either that or they want to perpetuate a mischevious myth.

Corbeliere

771 posts

150 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
People make mistakes.
To make it sound less serious I presume.

BertBert

21,309 posts

242 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
I'm sure I was only just over the limit, it couldn't be more than 32.
Bert

Aretnap

1,980 posts

182 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Kyodo said:
True. On a speed awareness course my wife was told the legal limit is exactly that. There was someone on her course for doing 32 in a 30.
On another forum I frequent a former traffic cop who takes a few speed awareness courses to supplement his meagre pension mentioned that he sometimes starts his sessions by asking everyone to introduce themselves by telling everyone their name and the speed they were caught at. As it happens, he already knows the speed everyone was caught at because it's printed on the list of attendees that he gets. Apparently there are always a few people who claim to have been done for a lower speed than they actually were.