Chim Vs Griff
Author
Discussion

WildfireS3

Original Poster:

9,947 posts

281 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
Now I know it's probably a long strung out arguement but I was wondering the difference between the Griff and Chims. As I understand they are basically the same car.

Not that I am in the position to get either... yet, but maybe soon.

I see/hear a lot about Griffs getting written off and being lethal in the wet. Where as I don't hear so many horror stories about the Chim.

I'd be looking at 400 on both fronts if I was to go for one.

I must say I do prefer the looks of the Griff over the Chim, but the Griffs do seem command higher prices.

Cheers

Chris

.Mark

11,104 posts

305 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
Must resist.........
I'm sure DustyC will be along shortly.

catretriever

2,090 posts

271 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
WildfireS3 said:

I see/hear a lot about Griffs getting written off and being lethal in the wet. Where as I don't hear so many horror stories about the Chim.


The weight of those golf clubs has a beneficial effect on traction I believe.

trinitycall

655 posts

265 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
WildfireS3 said:
I must say I do prefer the looks of the Griff over the Chim...

Cheers

Chris


Maybe on the planet Zarg.

I'm going to go out on a limb a suggest that the chimaera 400HC is the weapon of choice here.

I don't really think it's fair to compare the Chimaera with the griffith. It's like comparing Chelsea Football Club with a fat-arsed Sunday league team.

However, i'll give it ago... a Chimaera has the Italian looks and panache with a British heart and a careful Russian watchful eye, running out onto the pitch with all watching expecting a good result based on sound technique and the will to win.

While the Griffith has just sunk its fourth pint in the local boozer and is waddling out to have a long piss before stumbling onto the playing field.

Regards,

N

angusfaldo

2,831 posts

303 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
trinitycall said:




Maybe on the planet Zarg.

I'm going to go out on a limb a suggest that the chimaera 400HC is the weapon of choice here.

I don't really think it's fair to compare the Chimaera with the griffith. It's like comparing Chelsea Football Club with a fat-arsed Sunday league team.

However, i'll give it ago... a Chimaera has the Italian looks and panache with a British heart and a careful Russian watchful eye, running out onto the pitch with all watching expecting a good result based on sound technique and the will to win.

While the Griffith has just sunk its fourth pint in the local boozer and is waddling out to have a long piss before stumbling onto the playing field.

Regards,

N


Yawn yawn yawn.

anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
trinitycall said:




As an impartial outsider I've always thought that the Griff was a great car and a perfect stepping stone to the Tuscan and a Chim was a machine for transporting lardy-arsed barristers to the golf club.

But I don't want to interfere..................

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

277 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
Chims outsold the Griff by about 10:1. Has a bigger boot, obviously different styling and a dash that is allegedly easier to work behind.

The Griffith is a design classic, and has the award to prove it.

The Griff Growl is in year three now, the Chimps have yet to have their first tea party.

maggit

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
The earlier cars had different suspension setups and rbakes and the chassis may have been slightly different.

after 96 the chassis and brakes are the same.

most of the griffs are 5ltr so maybe thats why they get stuffed more...

the griff was sold in much fewer numbers than the chim so they are rarer and hence command higher prices.

I dont think there were many 4ltr griffs so i'd have thought youd be pushed to find one.

You've got to live with the car so buy the one you like the look of and prefer the interior to...

a 5ltr will be more larery to live with than a 4ltr, so if your worried about lunching it, get a 4ltr and some advanced trg...


G

grumbledoak

32,565 posts

262 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
yeah - wot he said (ie. Graham)

Go for the one you prefer the looks of. Get the best condition one you can afford, though.

N17 TVR

2,937 posts

300 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
IMHO, both are TVR's, both are great cars, one was designed for 'touring', the other wasn't.

The Chimaera in terms of performance is hardly a slouch.

I like the Griff but never wanted to own one, same with the Cerb.

I had the money & options to buy 4.5 / 5.0 litre Chimaeras, but found a 4.0HC that drove better than all the 5.0's I tested.

Haven't found the scenario yet where a 1 second difference 0-60 has really mattered.

It obviously does to all the 5.0 litre drivers cause it's all they drone on about, in between checking out adverts for penis enlargement



>> Edited by N17 TVR on Friday 21st January 16:37

neilmac

567 posts

291 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
mrmaggit said:
The Griff Growl is in year three now, the Chimps have yet to have their first tea party.

maggit


Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
neilmac said:

mrmaggit said:
The Griff Growl is in year three now, the Chimps have yet to have their first tea party.

maggit





Too busy driving to chat

crankedup

25,764 posts

272 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
Go fast touring in a Chim and watch it depreciate or go for the more animalistic nature of the Griff and it will hardly loose money at all.

Both cars offer great driving thrills

groucho

12,134 posts

275 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
The Griff is the one to have. More expensive but will hold it's value better. You won't want to get rid of it once you've got it though.

Grouch.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

290 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
The bottom line is.........


Go for whichever you like the looks of best. I've never driven a Griff, but would imagine there's not a huge amount to tell them apart - they share so many parts.

FWIW though, there's many more Chims than Griffs around so that's why Griffs command higher prices.

Both are lovely cars. But what you realy want/need is a Cerb

Pies

13,116 posts

285 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
WildfireS3 said:

I'd be looking at 400 on both fronts if I was to go for one.




IMHO condition comes first over engine size

Corin Denton

8,762 posts

297 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all

Corin Denton

8,762 posts

297 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
los Angeles said:
Corin ... Dusty is conspicuous by his absence from these disputes. Where is he?


I had an email from him yesterday, he's just been really busy.

He'll be back soon.

bobs4c

314 posts

267 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
Why are there more Chaemeras than Griffiths? Statistics speak for themselves, more people think that the Chimaera is a better all round car. I bought mine because I prefer the style and it's more practical, with the same performance - no contest.

Bob

Martin_S

9,939 posts

274 months

Friday 21st January 2005
quotequote all
bobs4c said:
Why are there more Chaemeras than Griffiths? Statistics speak for themselves, more people think that the Chimaera is a better all round car. Bob




Ah, of course. That makes perfect sense Bob.

Right...I'm off to buy me a Ford Mondeo 1.8!



>> Edited by Martin_S on Friday 21st January 20:17