747 "Afterburners"
Author
Discussion

944fan

Original Poster:

4,962 posts

214 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
I think I know the answer to this but thought I would ask.

I was watching Casino Royale again the other day and at the Miami airport scene when they are fighting on the truck a plane which looks like a 747 is coming into to land. It aborts the landing and as it takes off again the engines seem to ignite afterburners. I am guessing that this doesn't actually happen? I assume the whole plane was CGI'd so they just put that in for dramatic effect?

JuniorD

9,013 posts

252 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
The aircraft in the movie is a Skyfleet S570, which I think might have been equipped with afterburners. 747s do not come with afterburners as standard, I think they were a £630 upgrade on 1980-1982 UK models only.

944fan

Original Poster:

4,962 posts

214 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
Very funny, piss taking bd. :-)

I did say I assumed it was fake but like to know the answers for certain.

scubadude

2,619 posts

226 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
JuniorD said:
The aircraft in the movie is a Skyfleet S570, which I think might have been equipped with afterburners. 747s do not come with afterburners as standard, I think they were a £630 upgrade on 1980-1982 UK models only.
(Nerd hat on) Actually the Skyfleet S570 was the fictional aircraft they where unveiling/attempting to blow up and is not shown with its engines running (with or without afterburners) :-)


The plane attempting to land is (supposed to be) a 747 and while it exhibits flames/a glow from the rear of the engines its not really the effect you'd expect or they intended from afterburners, I assume its there to simply to suggest to the viewers that its been given full thrust hence it blows the chasing cars away.

(I assume this was shot at Dunsford or similar where they have a big ugly plane with twin engines pods that Clarkson is always using for his TG stunts)

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
I have seen flames come out the back of a 747's engines. It was during start up of a Virgin Atlantic 747-100 or 200 at Gatwick years ago. As the aircraft was being pushed back from the stand the engines were beginning to wind up and one of the engines made a loud bang and a ball of flame came out the back.

RizzoTheRat

28,787 posts

221 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
one of the engines made a loud bang and a ball of flame came out the back.
Isn't that usually followed by the compressor blades coming out of the front?

Kenty

5,286 posts

204 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
Eric Mc said:
one of the engines made a loud bang and a ball of flame came out the back.
Isn't that usually followed by the compressor blades coming out of the front?
Doesn't sound like a compressor stall or surge, probably just a very late ignition on start-up. A surge can wreck an engine with 'bits' out the front end. Fairly rare now with modern control systems.

JuniorD

9,013 posts

252 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
scubadude said:
JuniorD said:
The aircraft in the movie is a Skyfleet S570, which I think might have been equipped with afterburners. 747s do not come with afterburners as standard, I think they were a £630 upgrade on 1980-1982 UK models only.
(Nerd hat on) Actually the Skyfleet S570 was the fictional aircraft they where unveiling/attempting to blow up and is not shown with its engines running (with or without afterburners) :-)


The plane attempting to land is (supposed to be) a 747 and while it exhibits flames/a glow from the rear of the engines its not really the effect you'd expect or they intended from afterburners, I assume its there to simply to suggest to the viewers that its been given full thrust hence it blows the chasing cars away.

(I assume this was shot at Dunsford or similar where they have a big ugly plane with twin engines pods that Clarkson is always using for his TG stunts)
hehe I thought that the go-around aircraft in question might not have been Skyfleet S570 but I've never actually seen Casino Royale to know.



scubadude

2,619 posts

226 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
JuniorD said:
hehe I thought that the go-around aircraft in question might not have been Skyfleet S570 but I've never actually seen Casino Royale to know.
Never seen.... dear me, hand in 100man points and get to the back of the queue boy :-)

The DBS, Eva Green in that dress, a non-camp Bond, get on your pirate torrent site of choice tonight Junior!

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
I've not seen it either - but then, I was always a Connery man.

scubadude

2,619 posts

226 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I've not seen it either - but then, I was always a Connery man.
Craig is the most Connery like Bond since Connery IMO.

Halmyre

12,560 posts

168 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
scubadude said:
JuniorD said:
The aircraft in the movie is a Skyfleet S570, which I think might have been equipped with afterburners. 747s do not come with afterburners as standard, I think they were a £630 upgrade on 1980-1982 UK models only.
(Nerd hat on) Actually the Skyfleet S570 was the fictional aircraft they where unveiling/attempting to blow up and is not shown with its engines running (with or without afterburners) :-)


The plane attempting to land is (supposed to be) a 747 and while it exhibits flames/a glow from the rear of the engines its not really the effect you'd expect or they intended from afterburners, I assume its there to simply to suggest to the viewers that its been given full thrust hence it blows the chasing cars away.

(I assume this was shot at Dunsford or similar where they have a big ugly plane with twin engines pods that Clarkson is always using for his TG stunts)
I think the big ugly plane is the mock-up that was used as the Skyfleet.

SVX

2,188 posts

240 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
Yep... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-BDXJ

Sounds like the plane has had an interesting post operational career, at least it wasn't flown into Kemble and chopped up for scrap.

onyx39

11,349 posts

179 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I've not seen it either - but then, I was always a Connery man.
Eric are you trying to come out?

smile

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
Eric Mc said:
I've not seen it either - but then, I was always a Connery man.
Eric are you trying to come out?

smile
No, if I was "coming out" I'd be a Moore fan.

robm3

4,930 posts

256 months

Thursday 18th June 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
onyx39 said:
Eric Mc said:
I've not seen it either - but then, I was always a Connery man.
Eric are you trying to come out?

smile
No, if I was "coming out" I'd be a Moore fan.
Oh dear, I'm a 'Moore' fan...