42 points; still allowed to keep licence
Discussion
It's really just a single "hardship" plea, though, to a single totting-up-past-12...
7 x 6pt MS90, between Jun & Aug '14, all dealt with in one hearing.
That's your 42pts, right there. Clean licence beforehand. Obviously, the medical and other supporting evidence was fairly convincing...
Anybody fancy asking the meerkats what that'd do to a quote?
7 x 6pt MS90, between Jun & Aug '14, all dealt with in one hearing.
That's your 42pts, right there. Clean licence beforehand. Obviously, the medical and other supporting evidence was fairly convincing...
Anybody fancy asking the meerkats what that'd do to a quote?
TooMany2cvs said:
7 x 6pt MS90, between Jun & Aug '14, all dealt with in one hearing.
That's your 42pts, right there. Clean licence beforehand. Obviously, the medical and other supporting evidence was fairly convincing...
With that sort of level of offence in such a short period of time is there not an equally powerful argument to keep him off the road under medial advise ?That's your 42pts, right there. Clean licence beforehand. Obviously, the medical and other supporting evidence was fairly convincing...
The man clearly has no regard for other road users, or is not able to recognize when he is breaking limits etc.
TooMany2cvs said:
It's really just a single "hardship" plea, though, to a single totting-up-past-12...
7 x 6pt MS90, between Jun & Aug '14, all dealt with in one hearing.
That's your 42pts, right there. Clean licence beforehand. Obviously, the medical and other supporting evidence was fairly convincing...
Anybody fancy asking the meerkats what that'd do to a quote?
You've seen the picture where his passenger has his face out the side window, gurning at the camera, right? 7 x 6pt MS90, between Jun & Aug '14, all dealt with in one hearing.
That's your 42pts, right there. Clean licence beforehand. Obviously, the medical and other supporting evidence was fairly convincing...
Anybody fancy asking the meerkats what that'd do to a quote?
Grey Ghost said:
With that sort of level of offence in such a short period of time is there not an equally powerful argument to keep him off the road under medial advise ?
The man clearly has no regard for other road users, or is not able to recognize when he is breaking limits etc.
The most recent of that short, sharp spell of offences was 11 months ago... I'm sure the medical evidence would have said that he had recovered from the episode, and was now trying to rebuild his life, etc etc.The man clearly has no regard for other road users, or is not able to recognize when he is breaking limits etc.
Rude-boy said:
agtlaw said:
TooMany2cvs said:
What's the offence code for giving a t
t a lift?
Sounds like a Construction & Use offence. CU**
t a lift?
ging84 said:
He is a construction manager, presumably responsible for a number of vehicles, so he could simply have been guilty of the despicable crime of not keeping track of his employees vehicle usage
I haven't come across any construction managers who are responsible for multiple employees and cars.I think it's fair to say he ran up these points himself whilst I have been in the toting up position I was at 12 not 42 3 points and potentially 10 offences behind this guy. By the sounds of it his life is a crash cars and it's just a matter of time before he actually has one.
I was under the Impression that the exceptional hardship rule was if that was to others. 42 in 2 months that's mad how many red lights
I would of thought even Balfour Beatty fleet would s
t a brick when he came on fleet and would probably need to be proposed to the insurers at which point they may say no or expose restrictions. Plus he has a history of a nervous breakdown not exactly making him a star candidate. Edited by jbsportstech on Saturday 4th July 09:51
Edited by jbsportstech on Saturday 4th July 09:57
Morningside said:
Fubar1977 said:
I would love to hear him on the phone trying to get insurance...
Any accidents claims or convictions in the last 5 years?
Errrrr.....
Yeah, I can hear it as well and I bet he says "NO".Any accidents claims or convictions in the last 5 years?
Errrrr.....
Refuse and that'll be a trigger to load or refuse to quote.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



