40mm Explorer
Author
Discussion

CaptainSlow

Original Poster:

13,179 posts

242 months

Sunday 19th July 2015
quotequote all
Does the 40mm Explorer exist, I can see from references there was a jump from 36mm to 39mm but not many references to a 40mm? I see one from 2008 that is sized at 40mm.

hilly10

7,543 posts

258 months

Sunday 19th July 2015
quotequote all
The very first explorers were 34mm I think then they went to 36mm and now 39mm. The Explorer 2 is 40 or 42.

Dominic H

3,289 posts

262 months

Sunday 19th July 2015
quotequote all
hilly10 said:
The very first explorers were 34mm I think then they went to 36mm and now 39mm. The Explorer 2 is 40 or 42.
Yep, quite right Billy. The Explorer 14270/114270 is 36mm in diameter, the later 214270 is 39mm diameter. The Explorer 2 16570 is 40mm and the replacement 216570 is 42mm diameter.

D

CaptainSlow

Original Poster:

13,179 posts

242 months

Sunday 19th July 2015
quotequote all
ok thanks, this is the one I was looking at

http://www.watchfinder.co.uk/Rolex/Explorer/114270...

Dominic H

3,289 posts

262 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
ok thanks, this is the one I was looking at

http://www.watchfinder.co.uk/Rolex/Explorer/114270...
That's a 36mm Explorer 114270.

CaptainSlow

Original Poster:

13,179 posts

242 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
OK, a typo then thanks.

sad61t

1,100 posts

240 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Dominic H said:
That's a 36mm Explorer 114270.
Hi Dom, How can you tell? (Aside from years of experience smile The only difference I can see between this and the 40mm 214270 is the word Explorer is in a different place on the dial. Is that significant?
Thanks in advance.

hilly10

7,543 posts

258 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
The minute hand on the 39mm is not as long as on the 36mm. Caused quite a furore in some circles.

Paul

nikaiyo2

5,975 posts

225 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
sad61t said:
Hi Dom, How can you tell? (Aside from years of experience smile The only difference I can see between this and the 40mm 214270 is the word Explorer is in a different place on the dial. Is that significant?
Thanks in advance.
It says in the link and item description tongue out

Doesn't the 114270 also have lume in numbers?


sad61t

1,100 posts

240 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Thanks hilly.

Nikaiyo, yeah, my eyes are old enough to need 'Big Date' complications, but here I wasn't sure if the site's typo was the reference or the case size as either could be incorrect - indeed it's probably easier to mistype 21... as 11... than mis-measure the case. They've several other 36mm Explorers with the correct size stated, so I was wondering how Dom had deduced it was the 36mm case just from the photo.

bobbybee

889 posts

184 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
sad61t said:
Thanks hilly.

Nikaiyo, yeah, my eyes are old enough to need 'Big Date' complications, but here I wasn't sure if the site's typo was the reference or the case size as either could be incorrect - indeed it's probably easier to mistype 21... as 11... than mis-measure the case. They've several other 36mm Explorers with the correct size stated, so I was wondering how Dom had deduced it was the 36mm case just from the photo.
Easy.
Look at the minute hand
39mm



And now the 36mm