"Spitfire" Crash Landing
Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Luckilly, not a real one. Pilot did a good job -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbkFeaO-bDg&ap...

As ever, the media are reporting it as "Spitfire Crash".

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
one of these by the looks of it.

http://www.supermarineaircraft.com/MK2680

Cyder

7,186 posts

249 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
I think the Telegraph reported it as a " 'Spitfire' crash " which was quite refreshing to get some accuracy from the media for a change.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/aviation/11749376/...

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Telegraph link barred.

The Daily Telegraph has a paywall which kicks in after a number of views so posting links to their site is not always worth it.


geeks

11,591 posts

168 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Impressive landing i have to say! Must have been gut wrenching knowing you have to put it down like that though!

majordad

3,630 posts

226 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Would that destroy the aircraft ?

WinstonWolf

72,863 posts

268 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news/travel/lat...

A remarkably good landing all things considered.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
majordad said:
Would that destroy the aircraft ?
Not necessarily. It will no doubt require a major inspection and the engine and its bearings may need replacing due to any shock loading.

It's definitely need a new prop smile

Richyvrlimited

1,885 posts

192 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Telegraph link barred.

The Daily Telegraph has a paywall which kicks in after a number of views so posting links to their site is not always worth it.
Delete tracking cookies when you hit the limit. If you're using chrome, settings>more tools>developer tools>resources>cookies, right click and press clear for the telegraph.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Mucchos gracias.

EskimoArapaho

5,135 posts

164 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Richyvrlimited said:
Eric Mc said:
Telegraph link barred.

The Daily Telegraph has a paywall which kicks in after a number of views so posting links to their site is not always worth it.
Delete tracking cookies when you hit the limit. If you're using chrome, settings>more tools>developer tools>resources>cookies, right click and press clear for the telegraph.
Alternatively... just switch to Private Browsing. wink

Hooli

32,278 posts

229 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
rich83 said:
Nice over reactive "drive up" from all three fire engines.... clowns!
You wouldn't say that if it'd caught light though.

Blaster72

12,565 posts

226 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
rich83 said:
Nice over reactive "drive up" from all three fire engines.... clowns!
Erm, that's their job - clown!

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
rich83 said:
Nice over reactive "drive up" from all three fire engines.... clowns!
Erm, that's their job - clown!
Agreed.
Whenever there's the slightest hint of something going wrong in an aeroplane there's nothing more comforting than the sight of a crash tender.
Better to have them there and not need them than need them and not have them there.
The other thing to remember is that the first stages of post-crash recovery (making the aircraft safe and containing any fuels or oils etc.) is down to the crash crews so although they may not have a dire life-or-death situation to rush to they still have work to do.

Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 20th July 14:12

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
They got there just in time as well.

FourWheelDrift

92,237 posts

313 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
They got there just in time as well.
Well they wanted to get good pictures as well.


rich83

15,751 posts

167 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
Hooli said:
rich83 said:
Nice over reactive "drive up" from all three fire engines.... clowns!
You wouldn't say that if it'd caught light though.
It pulls up to a complete stop in the most undramatic crash landing I have ever seen (well done pilot). Quite clearly was not on fire, but they still had to drive up to it? Why?

rich83

15,751 posts

167 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Eric Mc said:
They got there just in time as well.
Well they wanted to get good pictures as well.

Bit like a police office filming a fight. Clowns!!

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
rich83 said:
Hooli said:
rich83 said:
Nice over reactive "drive up" from all three fire engines.... clowns!
You wouldn't say that if it'd caught light though.
It pulls up to a complete stop in the most undramatic crash landing I have ever seen (well done pilot). Quite clearly was not on fire, but they still had to drive up to it? Why?
Just in case it DOES catch fire.

Also, fire crews are well trained in extraction techniques, so they would also be ready to spring into action if the pilot was trapped or injured.

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
rich83 said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Eric Mc said:
They got there just in time as well.
Well they wanted to get good pictures as well.

Bit like a police office filming a fight. Clowns!!
Bit like a rescue crew filming the final approach to a potential crash site, which could prove extremely useful to crash investigators.
But yes, what utter clowns. Perhaps they've got a vacancy and you could apply to join?