Theoretical robbery...
Discussion
If you use an 'innocent agent' you are liable as the principal. A child under 10 being a practical example used to supply drugs on a dealer's behalf. I believe 'innocent agent' extends to trained animals, so I believe you'd be guilty of robbery if it were carried out.
In terms of merely training one, if that's literally what you meant, I can't think off the top of my head what would cover that. 'Going equipped' only applies to inanimate objects.
You would be entirely innocent if the monkey looks as good as this, though:

In terms of merely training one, if that's literally what you meant, I can't think off the top of my head what would cover that. 'Going equipped' only applies to inanimate objects.
You would be entirely innocent if the monkey looks as good as this, though:
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


