scamara van driving dangerously!
scamara van driving dangerously!
Author
Discussion

iam

Original Poster:

44 posts

262 months

Wednesday 2nd February 2005
quotequote all
this afternoon driving home from work, I was going round a roundabout in the outside lane (turning right), on the inside lane was a scamera van, he proceedeed to swap from the inside lane at the approach to the roundabout via the centre lane and almost into my near side!, I now wish I had made a mental note of his reg. as this is really getting to me now, how DARE these people do you for speeding when the standard of their own driving is attrocious, no DANGEROUS!, am fuming now!

iam

ledfoot

777 posts

281 months

Wednesday 2nd February 2005
quotequote all
iam said:
how DARE these people do you for speeding when the standard of their own driving is attrocious, no DANGEROUS!, am fuming now!

iam


But at least he was not speeding ??

Seems that peeps get away with anything nowadays except speeding

8Pack

5,182 posts

269 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Given that these little Hitlers only operate in a given planned area. You have the time, the place, direction of travel Report the basrd to the local pratnership.

nicecupoftea

25,586 posts

280 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
The answer is to have some sort of video always recording - bulletcam plus laptop/digitiser setup under the seat.

Wonder what would happen if you took CD of said encounter into a cop shop?

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Mrs LongQ, about a year or so after being scammed by a mobile under rather dubious circumstances, was nearly taken out at 8:30 one morning by a local scamera outfit van overtaking a bicycle on a bend which had rather iffy sight lines and a junction meters away.

The van crossed to her side of the road just as she had pulled out of the junction.

Apparently the passenger (they were two up) looked rather sheepish.

In a hurry to get the cash machine working I suppose.

Imadreamer

353 posts

275 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
That's not too bad. A few months ago I followed the London Safety Camera van through a section of East London at between 40-50 in a 30. It also proceeded to jump the red lights outside my office.

Streetcop

5,907 posts

267 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
While I agree, the driving sounds crap and isn't a good example in the slightest...

What you've described isn't dangerous driving.....

Don't be mad. Forget about it...

einion yrth

19,575 posts

273 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
While I agree, the driving sounds crap and isn't a good example in the slightest...

What you've described isn't dangerous driving.....

Don't be mad. Forget about it...

What is the definition of 'dangerous driving' in law then Gary m8, just so's we know like?

blademan

493 posts

267 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
While I agree, the driving sounds crap and isn't a good example in the slightest...

What you've described isn't dangerous driving.....

Don't be mad. Forget about it...


Morning Gary.
So would I be correct in saying that if I were to pull said maneuvre in front of you ( assume you were unmarked) then you wouldn't pull me over for a chat then?

>> Edited by blademan on Thursday 3rd February 09:26

JoolzB

3,549 posts

278 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
While I agree, the driving sounds crap and isn't a good example in the slightest...

What you've described isn't dangerous driving.....

Don't be mad. Forget about it...

Driving without due care and attention I would have thought was one of the biggest killers?

I witness this type of manouevre weekly and invariably the driver in the wrong will blame you It's reassuring to share the roads with incompetants who are doing nothing dangerous

maxrider

2,481 posts

265 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Streetcop said:


Don't be mad. Forget about it...


Yeah just like these scum 'forget' about me doing 34 in a 30 eh?

Streetcop

5,907 posts

267 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
blademan said:

Streetcop said:
While I agree, the driving sounds crap and isn't a good example in the slightest...

What you've described isn't dangerous driving.....

Don't be mad. Forget about it...



Morning Gary.
So would I be correct in saying that if I were to pull said maneuvre in front of you ( assume you were unmarked) then you wouldn't pull me over for a chat then?

Hiya Mate.
Yes, of course I would pull you in for a chat. One of the reasons why would be to determine if the car was actually yours, whether you were drunk etc etc.
However, I wouldn't have put pen to paper inthe circumstances that have been described. If I did decide to do that, it would be a ROS for Driving without Due Care/Attention...and that might not even be run by the CPS. Certainly not Dang. Drive.
>> Edited by blademan on Thursday 3rd February 09:26

Streetcop

5,907 posts

267 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
maxrider said:

Streetcop said:


Don't be mad. Forget about it...



Yeah just like these scum 'forget' about me doing 34 in a 30 eh?


In my force, the machine wont even register unless you are doing 36mph!!! FACT.

In addition...The SCUM as you call them are police officers. Doing a job.
If you really feel they are scum. Next time, don't write it on an internet chat room; Instead, park up, walk to the van and tell the officer inside...
See what happens..

320td

53 posts

263 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
You were in the outside lane of the roundabout turning RIGHT???

Think about it....

einion yrth

19,575 posts

273 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

maxrider said:


Streetcop said:


Don't be mad. Forget about it...




Yeah just like these scum 'forget' about me doing 34 in a 30 eh?



In my force, the machine wont even register unless you are doing 36mph!!! FACT.

In addition...The SCUM as you call them are police officers. Doing a job.
If you really feel they are scum. Next time, don't write it on an internet chat room; Instead, park up, walk to the van and tell the officer inside...
See what happens..

Arrest for behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace?

maxrider

2,481 posts

265 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Not referring to the individual police officers, referring to the pratnerships in general, no offence intended.

MilnerR

8,273 posts

287 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

maxrider said:


Streetcop said:


Don't be mad. Forget about it...




Yeah just like these scum 'forget' about me doing 34 in a 30 eh?



In my force, the machine wont even register unless you are doing 36mph!!! FACT.

In addition...The SCUM as you call them are police officers. Doing a job.
If you really feel they are scum. Next time, don't write it on an internet chat room; Instead, park up, walk to the van and tell the officer inside...
See what happens..


He'd close his window and switch radio2 up most probably. Having a go at the lads on the ground won't change anything. Kicking up a fuss with the guys who give the orders and make policy is the only way to get road safety addressed as a multifaceted problem.

OBSERVER

115 posts

274 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
320td said:
You were in the outside lane of the roundabout turning RIGHT???

Think about it....


iam said:
this afternoon driving home from work, I was going round a roundabout in the outside lane (turning right), on the inside lane was a scamera van, he proceedeed to swap from the inside lane at the approach to the roundabout via the centre lane and almost into my near side!, I now wish I had made a mental note of his reg. as this is really getting to me now, how DARE these people do you for speeding when the standard of their own driving is attrocious, no DANGEROUS!, am fuming now!


I suspect iam meant 'outside' by reference to the road approaching the roundabout rather than the roundabout itself. Otherwise the scamera van could not have crossed centre lane "almost into my near side".

Either that, or he WAS in the wrong lane and additionally can't tell his offside from his nearside. Not very iamish, if true.

off_again

13,917 posts

263 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
A few months ago, I was passed by a Scamera van on a dual carriage way. I was doing 72MPH (GPS verified).... he cant have been speeding could he? I mean its tantamount to running around a busy shopping centre with a loaded gun isnt it?

Speed kills remember....

P.S. And no I dont have a camera phone or digital camera in the car - shame really.... boo hoo

Cooperman

4,428 posts

279 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

maxrider said:


Streetcop said:


Don't be mad. Forget about it...




Yeah just like these scum 'forget' about me doing 34 in a 30 eh?



In my force, the machine wont even register unless you are doing 36mph!!! FACT.

In addition...The SCUM as you call them are police officers. Doing a job.
If you really feel they are scum. Next time, don't write it on an internet chat room; Instead, park up, walk to the van and tell the officer inside...
See what happens..


Not necessarliy Police Officers doing their job, more likely illegal civilian camera operators with little driving experience themselves. The same applies to the speeding vans. More & more civvies manning them now, contrary to the approval for use which is, as understood, to 'confirm the opinion of a police officer......'.
If civvies, then I reckon the word SCUM, whilst unpleasant, might be the correct one.