Refinancing a larger portfolio
Refinancing a larger portfolio
Author
Discussion

drainbrain

Original Poster:

5,637 posts

141 months

Monday 17th August 2015
quotequote all
My friend has a 100+ portfolio of rental properties. His loan facility with a major bank runs out next year. He really doesn't want to renew with the current lender. Any suggestions on who best to go to for a new arrangement? LTV is about 35%. Term required is 15 years on repayment basis. Fixed rate around 5% ideally. No objection to recommendations to FAs who can handle the deal on a fee basis.

zedstar

1,788 posts

206 months

Tuesday 18th August 2015
quotequote all
drainbrain said:
My friend has a 100+ portfolio of rental properties. His loan facility with a major bank runs out next year. He really doesn't want to renew with the current lender. Any suggestions on who best to go to for a new arrangement? LTV is about 35%. Term required is 15 years on repayment basis. Fixed rate around 5% ideally. No objection to recommendations to FAs who can handle the deal on a fee basis.
What's the location, and do you know who his current lender is?

Babber1

17 posts

153 months

Wednesday 19th August 2015
quotequote all
Any of the main UK property funders would be interested in this. natWest and Lloyds would certainly do this and would be the most price competitive. Depends on the level of income generated by the portfolio, location, condition of properties etc but I think this would be pretty straightforward for him to refinance this. He would need new prof valuations though I suspect...

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Wednesday 19th August 2015
quotequote all
drainbrain said:
My friend has a 100+ portfolio of rental properties. His loan facility with a major bank runs out next year. He really doesn't want to renew with the current lender. Any suggestions on who best to go to for a new arrangement? LTV is about 35%. Term required is 15 years on repayment basis. Fixed rate around 5% ideally. No objection to recommendations to FAs who can handle the deal on a fee basis.
Assume 100 properties at £100,000 each - that's a £3.5million loan on a £10 million portfolio.

Why one earth would he want to "fix" at nearly double the cost of current mortgage rates? He'll be paying about £80,000 p.a. more interest than he needs to. His rental income will rise with inflation anyway.

None of this makes any sense at all. None whatsoever.

drainbrain

Original Poster:

5,637 posts

141 months

Wednesday 19th August 2015
quotequote all
zedstar said:
What's the location, and do you know who his current lender is?
Scotland. RBS.

drainbrain

Original Poster:

5,637 posts

141 months

Wednesday 19th August 2015
quotequote all
Babber1 said:
Any of the main UK property funders would be interested in this. natWest and Lloyds would certainly do this and would be the most price competitive. Depends on the level of income generated by the portfolio, location, condition of properties etc but I think this would be pretty straightforward for him to refinance this. He would need new prof valuations though I suspect...
Oddly enough it's not that straightforward although I don't think it'll be that difficult either once in the right hands. Certainly any lender will require valuations, and one of the worst parts is that security has to be taken over every unit individually (I think). So along with drawdown fee (and quite possibly FA's fee too) there's probably a six figure cost involved, which isn't the happiest prospect.



Granfondo

12,241 posts

236 months

Wednesday 19th August 2015
quotequote all
Sell off enough to pay the loan and be free! smile

drainbrain

Original Poster:

5,637 posts

141 months

Wednesday 19th August 2015
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Why one earth would he want to "fix" at nearly double the cost of current mortgage rates? He'll be paying about £80,000 p.a. more interest than he needs to. His rental income will rise with inflation anyway.
Would it be safe to assume that you don't know or know of a lender who'd be prepared to lend my friend longterm fixed money at current (residential?) mortgage rates? Because if you do, it would be of great interest, not to mention be worth a 'very good drink' to you to make the connection.

Out of interest if it exists at all what is the longterm fixed residential rate these days?

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Can't speak for "fixed" but there are IMO some absolute bargains in the "floating" category around 2%!

For rudimentary guidance have a look at this link for both fixed and floating rates,

http://moneyfacts.co.uk/mortgages/best-mortgage-de...

GT03ROB

14,026 posts

251 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
I would think drainbrains mate has the problem that it's a substantial portfolio. The normal BTL or residential mortgage rates will not normally apply to a portfolio of 100 plus properties. A lot of BTL mortgages are limited to the number of properties that can be in the portfolio.

JQ

6,832 posts

209 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Can't speak for "fixed" but there are IMO some absolute bargains in the "floating" category around 2%!

For rudimentary guidance have a look at this link for both fixed and floating rates,

http://moneyfacts.co.uk/mortgages/best-mortgage-de...
What's the relevance of BTL rates, the OP's mate will be taking a commercial loan.

The best way would be to employ a Commercial Finance Broker - they trawl the banks for the best deal, apply pressure on valuers to keep costs down and values up. I can recommend someone if needed via PM.

If not then a trawl of all the banks by your mate - put a business plan together with all the relevant information and let them come to your mate with a proposal. All the major banks all falling over themselves to lend on property again - RBS, Santander, HSBC, Lloyds etc all keen to lend. Also consider the likes of Aldermore or Handlesbanken.

drainbrain

Original Poster:

5,637 posts

141 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
GT03ROB said:
I would think drainbrains mate has the problem that it's a substantial portfolio. The normal BTL or residential mortgage rates will not normally apply to a portfolio of 100 plus properties. A lot of BTL mortgages are limited to the number of properties that can be in the portfolio.
Correct. Next level of problem is the 'lending by formula' one which provides almost endless difficulties for large portfolio financing. There's always some criterion that creates a stumbling block. But a London based IFA firm has (today) agreed to take the case and provide a bespoke solution.

drainbrain

Original Poster:

5,637 posts

141 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
JQ said:
What's the relevance of BTL rates, the OP's mate will be taking a commercial loan.

The best way would be to employ a Commercial Finance Broker - they trawl the banks for the best deal, apply pressure on valuers to keep costs down and values up. I can recommend someone if needed via PM.

If not then a trawl of all the banks by your mate - put a business plan together with all the relevant information and let them come to your mate with a proposal. All the major banks all falling over themselves to lend on property again - RBS, Santander, HSBC, Lloyds etc all keen to lend. Also consider the likes of Aldermore or Handlesbanken.
Thanks. PM will be sent. Contact was made today with a CFB but another one certainly won't hurt. The costs of moving portfolios are eyewatering and the normal CFB fees don't add much to it relatively speaking whilst, as you say, providing costsaving negotiations with valuers/lawyers etc which can make a skilled CFB very worthwhile to engage.

Also, as you say, normal BTL rates are irrelevant and of course it'll be a comm.loan anyway. But I'd be interested in what current fixed-for-a-lifetime rates are on either BTL or resi. I think current 10 year are hovering just under 4%. Don't know if 15 or lifetime-of-loan even exist. But if they do, I'd be surprised if they were much under 5.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
drainbrain said:
normal rates are irrelevant
Absolutely not. When you see rates of 2% being publicly advertised that should be your target! It makes no sense to just roll over and say, "of course I'm happy to pay 5% in £3.5m when you're only charging other people 2% for loans secured on residential property with 35% LTV".

Sarnie

8,373 posts

239 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Absolutely not. When you see rates of 2% being publicly advertised that should be your target! It makes no sense to just roll over and say, "of course I'm happy to pay 5% in £3.5m when you're only charging other people 2% for loans secured on residential property with 35% LTV".
Completely different criteria, risk and regulations involved...............

Burwood

18,718 posts

276 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Sarnie said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
Absolutely not. When you see rates of 2% being publicly advertised that should be your target! It makes no sense to just roll over and say, "of course I'm happy to pay 5% in £3.5m when you're only charging other people 2% for loans secured on residential property with 35% LTV".
Completely different criteria, risk and regulations involved...............
Could you explain the risks here?

Sarnie

8,373 posts

239 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Burwood said:
Sarnie said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
Absolutely not. When you see rates of 2% being publicly advertised that should be your target! It makes no sense to just roll over and say, "of course I'm happy to pay 5% in £3.5m when you're only charging other people 2% for loans secured on residential property with 35% LTV".
Completely different criteria, risk and regulations involved...............
Could you explain the risks here?
100+ properties.............huge advance............lending to a business not an individual............huge relgulatory and compliance requirements.....

You just simply cannot compare an individual letting out a single property on standard BTL rates to someone wanting this level of Commerical lending....

GT03ROB

14,026 posts

251 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Burwood said:
Sarnie said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
Absolutely not. When you see rates of 2% being publicly advertised that should be your target! It makes no sense to just roll over and say, "of course I'm happy to pay 5% in £3.5m when you're only charging other people 2% for loans secured on residential property with 35% LTV".
Completely different criteria, risk and regulations involved...............
Could you explain the risks here?
Think of it like this repossession sale of 1 property, will be done at a discount, repossession sale of 100+ properties will require a far higher discount....

Burwood

18,718 posts

276 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Sarnie said:
Burwood said:
Sarnie said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
Absolutely not. When you see rates of 2% being publicly advertised that should be your target! It makes no sense to just roll over and say, "of course I'm happy to pay 5% in £3.5m when you're only charging other people 2% for loans secured on residential property with 35% LTV".
Completely different criteria, risk and regulations involved...............
Could you explain the risks here?
100+ properties.............huge advance............lending to a business not an individual............huge relgulatory and compliance requirements.....

You just simply cannot compare an individual letting out a single property on standard BTL rates to someone wanting this level of Commerical lending....
I didnt compare the two. You said big risk with 65% equity. I would say the tiniest of risks. He defaults you(the bank) swoops in and flog them for 50% of book plus think of the fees then.

Burwood

18,718 posts

276 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
GT03ROB said:
Burwood said:
Sarnie said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
Absolutely not. When you see rates of 2% being publicly advertised that should be your target! It makes no sense to just roll over and say, "of course I'm happy to pay 5% in £3.5m when you're only charging other people 2% for loans secured on residential property with 35% LTV".
Completely different criteria, risk and regulations involved...............
Could you explain the risks here?
Think of it like this repossession sale of 1 property, will be done at a discount, repossession sale of 100+ properties will require a far higher discount....
Given the chap has 65% equity, i would think the risk of negative equity are slim to zero. I was just curious what Sarnie would come up with as 'risks'. smile