Cracked laminated sunroof. MOT failure in UK?
Cracked laminated sunroof. MOT failure in UK?
Author
Discussion

caziques

Original Poster:

2,847 posts

198 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
Just interested - the MOT equivalent in NZ is largely a copy of the UK regs, although any rust here is treated like an STD.

The local station has noticed my sunroof has some cracks in it (they've missed it before), and cite "safety" as the reason for not giving an MOT (WOF or Warrant of Fitness).

I can take it out, and put it back - just wondered if a UK examiner would fail it - or would it be an advisory. Being laminated it's almost bullet proof.

jamesh764

184 posts

172 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
My wife's car has passed the last three MOTs with a crack in the sunroof.

Spangles

1,441 posts

215 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
It's not a failure and would be a manual advisory of the tester could be bothered, I probably wouldn't.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
Sunroof isn't testable at all.

Cracks in windscreens are failable because of visibility. If you're looking out the sunroof at where you're going, something's already gone a bit wrong.

justanother5tar

1,314 posts

155 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
If you're looking out the sunroof at where you're going, something's already gone a bit wrong.
laugh

mcford

819 posts

204 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Sunroof isn't testable at all.

Cracks in windscreens are failable because of visibility. If you're looking out the sunroof at where you're going, something's already gone a bit wrong.
And only then if the drivers view of the road through it is affected.

Retroman

975 posts

163 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
Perhaps they failed it due to the affect it may have on the structural rigidity of the body shell.

wolf1

3,100 posts

280 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
Retroman said:
Perhaps they failed it due to the affect it may have on the structural rigidity of the body shell.
It's a moving panel of glass, it serves not structural purpose whatsoever.

battered

4,088 posts

177 months

Thursday 8th October 2015
quotequote all
You can remove the thing if you wish. It's not structural as it's an opening panel. Not worth mentioning.