To Turbo or 5ltr+?
To Turbo or 5ltr+?
Author
Discussion

TVaRt

Original Poster:

365 posts

244 months

Tuesday 20th October 2015
quotequote all
hi i currently run a Griffith 500 with a 4.6 V8Developments bottom end, that i need to rebuild as a piston ring has gone on cyl 1, otherwise its a low milliage and good condition engine with new Kent 218 cam, refurbed/improved 500 heads and all intake components, plus ACT carbon plenum etc. I cant decide whether to get a V8 Developments 5.0 or greater bottom end and swop everything over, or rebuild the engine keeping it at 4.6 but putting low comp pistons in it and a nice big turbo. I work at an automotive engineering company (aftermarket parts not engine rebuilds) so i can fab up turbo manifold etc.

What would you do, is a potential 500bhp a little silly in a griff? instead aim for 350bhp n/a.


macdeb

8,720 posts

277 months

Tuesday 20th October 2015
quotequote all
scratchchin bring it on.
you are welcome to me PM for my own experience if you wish wink

Edited by macdeb on Tuesday 20th October 20:46

QBee

22,048 posts

166 months

Tuesday 20th October 2015
quotequote all
My favourite question - for what do you plan to use the finished car?
Sunday drives/car shows
Fast road
Continental touring
Bragging rights
Track/sprint days
Something of which I have not thought.

That will perhaps determine what you do

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

282 months

Tuesday 20th October 2015
quotequote all
Turbocharge the 4.6. You'll never regret it. It's a good solid platform to work with. My addiction started when I turbocharged a 4.5. I just kept on increasing the capacity whilst keeping boost sensible.

ETA, a very long time ago I help somebody called Geary turbocharge his Griff. That was a 5.0 and we fitted some buick heads to lower his compression by a couple of clicks wink.


Edited by Boosted LS1 on Tuesday 20th October 20:53

roseytvr

1,790 posts

200 months

Tuesday 20th October 2015
quotequote all
TVaRt said:
hi i currently run a Griffith 500 with a 4.6 V8Developments bottom end, that i need to rebuild as a piston ring has gone on cyl 1, otherwise its a low milliage and good condition engine with new Kent 218 cam, refurbed/improved 500 heads and all intake components, plus ACT carbon plenum etc. I cant decide whether to get a V8 Developments 5.0 or greater bottom end and swop everything over, or rebuild the engine keeping it at 4.6 but putting low comp pistons in it and a nice big turbo. I work at an automotive engineering company (aftermarket parts not engine rebuilds) so i can fab up turbo manifold etc.

What would you do, is a potential 500bhp a little silly in a griff? instead aim for 350bhp n/a.
If I had my time again FI is the way I would go. 350 bhp plus na is very expensive!

TVaRt

Original Poster:

365 posts

244 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
The car is a Sunday drive/car show/road car only. I dont do long distances in it, but i like the idea of a potentially very fast car that will give modern stuff a shock, give the Griffith its muscle car title back.

QBee said:
My favourite question - for what do you plan to use the finished car?
Sunday drives/car shows
Fast road
Continental touring
Bragging rights
Track/sprint days
Something of which I have not thought.

That will perhaps determine what you do

TVaRt

Original Poster:

365 posts

244 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Hmm insteresting, i could raise some funds by the sale of my ACT plenum and 500 heads. Did you put in forged pistons? i can find some forged pistons but not with valve cuts to clear my cam (Kent H218), or would i need to change the cam also?

I have just realised that i have already spoken to you about this wink. Probably need to have more of a chat...

Boosted LS1 said:
Turbocharge the 4.6. You'll never regret it. It's a good solid platform to work with. My addiction started when I turbocharged a 4.5. I just kept on increasing the capacity whilst keeping boost sensible.

ETA, a very long time ago I help somebody called Geary turbocharge his Griff. That was a 5.0 and we fitted some buick heads to lower his compression by a couple of clicks wink.


Edited by Boosted LS1 on Tuesday 20th October 20:53[/footnote]
[footnote]Edited by TVaRt on Wednesday 21st October 08:19

Bluebottle

3,498 posts

262 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
roseytvr said:
If I had my time again FI is the way I would go. 350 bhp plus na is very expensive!
So is F.I. when it all goes horribly wrong! and i lost 4.5 yrs of enjoyment through it frown

on the plus side nearly...500 bhp and similar torque was worth it in the end smile

Dominic TVRetto

1,405 posts

203 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
TVaRt said:
Hmm insteresting, i could raise some funds by the sale of my ACT plenum and 500 heads.
Please contact me if you decide to sell your ACT plenum! Would relish the chance to take it off your hands...

Thanks,

Dom

QBee

22,048 posts

166 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
TVaRt said:
The car is a Sunday drive/car show/road car only. I dont do long distances in it, but i like the idea of a potentially very fast car that will give modern stuff a shock, give the Griffith its muscle car title back.

QBee said:
My favourite question - for what do you plan to use the finished car?
Sunday drives/car shows
Fast road
Continental touring
Bragging rights
Track/sprint days
Something of which I have not thought.

That will perhaps determine what you do
Take serious heed of Bluebottle's advice - having followed the FI threads on here for some time now, I can see a lot of joy is to be had when it all works properly, but a load of grief is also available when it doesn't. We only get to hear of the problems on here, but they do seem to be many and varied.

And it may not be as cheap as it looks, as a good wallop of turbo will break much of your transmission unless you upgrade it, and can even break your engine.....and you will almost certainly be upgrading the engine management system too, unless you already have, as well as having one or more re-maps of the system. Indeed, try to plan your work so that you don't end up having to have several remaps as you do things in stages, as unless you have the knowledge to do them yourself, they are £250-750 a time in my experience.

Good luck and have fun....but make sure first that it is the fun you want to have, and do your homework before you start. Perhaps have a lengthy chat with Macdeb, and ask him to give you a costed list of all the parts and services that he paid for to get to the glorious result he now has.

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

282 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
TVaRt said:
Edited by TVaRt on Wednesday 21st October 08:19
I nearly always used forged pistons as that allows you to pick the compression ratio as well as enhancing the pistons characteristics in line with boost. The 4.6 has good pistons though unlike earlier rovers. It could run 5-7 psi of boost happily enough. I've used 218 cams in blown rovers and they were fine.

steve-V8s

2,924 posts

270 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
If you want 350+ NA it will be horrible to drive unless you use individual throttle bodies at which time it gets even more expensive. If I was staring again I would go FI but charger rather than turbo

TVR Beaver

2,874 posts

202 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Is Eann still doing turbo kits.. his was a magic conversion. http://www.torquev8.com/

have a word with him... he knows a thing or two wink

macdeb

8,720 posts

277 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
TVR Beaver said:
Is Eann still doing turbo kits.. his was a magic conversion. http://www.torquev8.com/

have a word with him... he knows a thing or two wink
yes

macdeb

8,720 posts

277 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
QBee said:
Take serious heed of Bluebottle's advice - having followed the FI threads on here for some time now, I can see a lot of joy is to be had when it all works properly, but a load of grief is also available when it doesn't. We only get to hear of the problems on here, but they do seem to be many and varied.

And it may not be as cheap as it looks, as a good wallop of turbo will break much of your transmission unless you upgrade it, and can even break your engine.....and you will almost certainly be upgrading the engine management system too, unless you already have, as well as having one or more re-maps of the system. Indeed, try to plan your work so that you don't end up having to have several remaps as you do things in stages, as unless you have the knowledge to do them yourself, they are £250-750 a time in my experience.

Good luck and have fun....but make sure first that it is the fun you want to have, and do your homework before you start. Perhaps have a lengthy chat with Macdeb, and ask him to give you a costed list of all the parts and services that he paid for to get to the glorious result he now has.
crikey, thanks Anthony. wavey


phazed

22,434 posts

226 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
You could get a Rob 5.4/5.5 bottom end and fit all the trimmings to achieve 370-380 BHP/ 450 Torque NA or thereabouts.

A ral pussycat to drive with plenty of real world power.

Of course more expensive then basic FI but simpler and hopefully last longer!

Pupp

12,829 posts

294 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
QBee said:
We only get to hear of the problems on here, but they do seem to be many and varied.
And we all know the NA cars, standard or tweaked, never break, leak, or need mapping do they?

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

282 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
phazed said:
You could get a Rob 5.4/5.5 bottom end and fit all the trimmings to achieve 370-380 BHP/ 450 Torque NA or thereabouts.

A ral pussycat to drive with plenty of real world power.

Of course more expensive then basic FI but simpler and hopefully last longer!
Turbocharged forced induction's actually easier on the con-rods then in a n/a engine. Imo a modest FI engine should last as long as a n/a engine. For a start it won't need revving to make power as 'extra' revs put huge loads on an engine. Heat management is the name of the game as well as sensible engine management. A street turbo engine never sees a lot of sustained boost. It just needs to flick up through a few gear changes wink

neal1980

2,584 posts

261 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
To be fair a 4.0 turbo will see 380bhp...Big power NA always costs ALOT more I wouldn't waste your money.

Once you have been out in a turbo converted car your mind will be made up as most that have.

Sounds like your quite handy with the fab so another custom turbo install would be good to see smile

QBee

22,048 posts

166 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Pupp said:
QBee said:
We only get to hear of the problems on here, but they do seem to be many and varied.
And we all know the NA cars, standard or tweaked, never break, leak, or need mapping do they?
That's not what I meant.
I meant we don't hear much about the successful FI conversions, of which there must have been many.
But what we do hear about is those who convert and then have problems and frustrations, many and varied and sometimes pretty expensive.
Yes, standard cars have problems, Modded NA cars have problems. I've had lean running problems initially after my own mods, due to nobody thinking to map the ECU precisely to the modified NA car.
But none since then, 24,000 miles on, despite a lot of hammering on track days. Unlike Bluebottle, I have had 28 months of fun out of the last 30.