Now the Vulcan is grounded, what is next?
Now the Vulcan is grounded, what is next?
Author
Discussion

S10GTA

Original Poster:

13,770 posts

196 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
So what is the next project? Lightning to the sky?

Shar2

2,269 posts

242 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Well, I believe the team working on the Shackleton at Coventry are hoping to get it into the air in the next year or two.

richw_82

992 posts

215 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Can I suggest that you look to the same stable as Vulcan, but a few years older?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOQghk5ord0

sa_20v

4,112 posts

260 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
S10GTA said:
So what is the next project? Lightning to the sky?
Nothing, we're going to read Dr Seuss quotes and watch our aviation heritage slowly rot away. rolleyes

slartibartfast

4,031 posts

230 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
richw_82 said:
Can I suggest that you look to the same stable as Vulcan, but a few years older?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOQghk5ord0
Yes I'd gladly donate to see a shack flying aslong as VTTS have fkall to do with it!

richw_82

992 posts

215 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Better get your hand in your pocket then. smile

alangtt

279 posts

191 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Apologies for the lack of effort on my part, but what's so special?

dave-the-diver

278 posts

215 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
After Rich's Shack, can we have a Mossie, please?

https://peoplesmosquito.wordpress.com/

David

GRS40

164 posts

198 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Shackleton!

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
alangtt said:
Apologies for the lack of effort on my part, but what's so special?
About what?

alangtt

279 posts

191 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
alangtt said:
Apologies for the lack of effort on my part, but what's so special?
About what?
My fault. Sorry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOQghk5ord0

ukaskew

10,642 posts

250 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
sa_20v said:
Nothing, we're going to read Dr Seuss quotes and watch our aviation heritage slowly rot away. rolleyes
Fairly close to the truth, I imagine.

The make up of airshows in 10 years + or so will be fascinating. Presumably the dwindling stock of privately owned 50s/60s jets will dwindle further if they're not outlawed out of existence anyway, and nothing currently, er, current will move into private hands as it will be far too complex and costly to fly.

We will be left with whatever current stuff the various forces can afford to bring along, and vintage props, although even those won't be able to fly indefinitely.

Smollet

16,365 posts

219 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
What about all the fanciful and far fetched ideas about Concorde taking to the air again? More chance of cycling to Pluto I'd imagine.

richw_82

992 posts

215 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
alangtt said:
Eric Mc said:
alangtt said:
Apologies for the lack of effort on my part, but what's so special?
About what?
My fault. Sorry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOQghk5ord0
You could ask the same about the Vulcan. There was nothing special about it until it made it into preservation.

Okay, whats special about the Shackleton, in particular WR963?


The Shackleton was the last multiple piston engined front line aircraft serving with the RAF. It was the last of an evolution of design that began in 1936, lasting until 1991, from Manchester, through Lancaster, Lincoln, and on into the Argosy. Avro's last piston engined bomber - and before anyone starts saying 'it was a maritime reconnaisance design' the loadout drawings dated 1946 show bombs carried before torpedos; with a 12,000lb "tallboy" being top of the list.

It served all around the world in multiple roles, doing whatever was called of it. From emergency troop carrying, search and rescue, or going back to its roots and bombing. The infamous 20 year temporary solution to Britain's lack of an Airborne Early Warning aircraft, when it finally got replaced with an aircraft several generations ahead - and during work up trials still sometimes put it to shame using a 1940's radar.

Of 185 Shackletons built there are less than 16 remaining worldwide, and only 3 of those are capable of running their engines up. Of that three, only one has within the last 18 months. Only one is capable of taxying or any kind of useful movement. Only one has any kind of useful flying life left or the paperwork to support it for that time. WR963 at Coventry Airport.

Built in 1954, she is the highest houred Shackleton of the lot, at 15,483 flying hours - but this isn't a limiting factor as the airframe can be continually rebuilt just as with the Lancaster. With the 594 hours left to the next spar work, there are approximately 10 years worth of flying left on the airframe. The next rework will give it a further 6,300 hours which will see the aircraft outlast many of our own lives.

We don't require the support of Rolls Royce, Marshalls or BAE, as the engines are easily rebuilt (compared to gas turbines) and the design and its associated Design Rights were purchased in 1993. We've spent the better part of 20 years collecting every shred of data we can. We can trace every flight our aircraft has taken form 1959 - present day, including the slightly naughty 'hop' back in Nov 2008, with the late Gp Capt Dave Hencken at the controls.

Every servicing log, report, repair scheme, parts diagram. Drawings for all components, from Dowty, DeHavillands, Smiths, Dunlop. We don't intend to fall victim to ANY company that had a hand in Shackleton production trying to pull the rug from under us. We've quietly been buying up Shackleton components to build our stock. A lot of it is new or freshly overhauled. Control surfaces. Airframe parts. Hydraulics. Pneumatics. Engines. Wheels. Props. A Shackleton overhaul kit, in its entirety. Every item on the lifed items list - ready to go.

Its not just the aircraft herself thats special. Its the hard work thats gone into it so far, while standing patiently in the shade of the V-bomber. If you want to support some other project, do. But bear in mind, not many are as far along the path as us, or as prepared for the future.

We are going to fly our Shackleton within the next couple of years, regardless.




Edited by richw_82 on Wednesday 28th October 19:00

sa_20v

4,112 posts

260 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Smollet said:
What about all the fanciful and far fetched ideas about Concorde taking to the air again? More chance of cycling to Pluto I'd imagine.
These things aren't fallen ethereal beings, they're planes and could all fly again.

72twink

963 posts

271 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
If only for the noise we have to get behind Rich and the Shackleton team!

Not the best quality clip but just listen to this old girl roll into her display!

Griffons!

lynothehammer

34 posts

131 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Yup i'd definitely like to see the Shackleton get back into the sky, only ever seen one on the ground.

As much as it pains me to say it i will miss the Vulcan, i just won't miss all the BS that goes with it from moronic fans and VTTST.


ecsrobin

18,642 posts

194 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
lynothehammer said:
Yup i'd definitely like to see the Shackleton get back into the sky, only ever seen one on the ground.

As much as it pains me to say it i will miss the Vulcan, i just won't miss all the BS that goes with it from moronic fans and VTTST.
Agreed.

Marlin45

1,334 posts

193 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Then there's the Mozzie project.........?

Riley Blue

23,205 posts

255 months

Wednesday 28th October 2015
quotequote all
Now you're talking...