Coal or Logs?
Author
Discussion

MeepMeepNeeaaar!

Original Poster:

141 posts

261 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
Discuss.

Assuming approval of tenancy references (which should be a formality) I'm moving into a country gaff with an open fireplace at the end of this month.

Right out in the sticks with the nearest neighbour 50-100 yards away over a hillock so probably not in a 'smoke-free' zone.

I've only had experience with log fires, coal fires strike me as a bit messy in comparison. So currently inclined to go with firewood.

Any advantages to coal?

vixpy1

42,697 posts

287 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
parents use wood and a bit of coal.

They have only just stopped using the wood from the 87 storm!

omitchell

19,762 posts

258 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
we use wood and for the extra umph sometimes put coal on but it's significantly hotter than wood and requires a decent base first otherwise it will just go out

hugoagogo

23,427 posts

256 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
coal fire is less messy if anything

less ash

dilbert

7,741 posts

254 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
If you use wood lot's you'll need to keep your chimney swept (more) regularly.

>> Edited by dilbert on Friday 11th February 00:25

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

257 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
You'll not get coal burning without some wood.

As for the smoke free stuff, well I live in a smoke free zone and it doesn't stop me from burning whatever I like. What are they going to do - produce a warrant?

hugoagogo

23,427 posts

256 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
parrot of doom said:
You'll not get coal burning without some wood.


only a few sticks

eharding

14,648 posts

307 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
Well, at the risk of being branded a happy-clappy-
hippy-bippy-tree-fondling-beardy-eco-wnaker,
I think you'll find burning wood is carbon-neutral,
whereas coal is the fuel of the devil. Wood
ash makes a tasty alternative to muesli as well,
which is nice.

condor

8,837 posts

271 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
we always did...rolled up newspaper, kindling - coal....then when it got really going ...logs

so a mix of both is my advice

thebluemonkey

1,296 posts

263 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
The only answer must be peat. Greatest smell ever IMHO.

ErnestM

11,621 posts

290 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
Coal is hotter and lasts longer.

Wood makes that nice crackling sound, however.

Horses for courses...


ErnestM

Trooper2

6,676 posts

254 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
Usually logs but occasionally it feels like coal!

>> Edited by Trooper2 on Friday 11th February 06:13

selmer

2,760 posts

265 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
thebluemonkey said:
The only answer must be peat. Greatest smell ever IMHO.

Shame it's too early for a scotch
if it's a fully open fire and the chimney isn't blocked at all, you'll get away with a mix of logs and coal (only after you've got the kindling going though)
We have to use anthracite as we have one that's enclosed. The normal house coal doesn't last long on ours and produces a lot of smoke.

Davel

8,982 posts

281 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
Wood is often free!

nubbin

6,809 posts

301 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
hugoagogo said:
coal fire is less messy if anything

less ash


Other way round, actually. Coal leaves a lot of unburnt cinders, whereas wood burns completely to small volumes of ash. Coal is hotter, but wood fires have lots of lovely flames!

Also, wood is carbon neutral, so it's environmentally friendly (Like I care...)

minimax

11,985 posts

279 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
dilbert said:
If you use wood lot's you'll need to keep your chimney swept (more) regularly.

>> Edited by dilbert on Friday 11th February 00:25


and you will also find that wood will tar up your chimbley too over time. however as it's not your house this will be the landlords responsibility.

I personally would go with wood, it smells and looks great plus chopping wood in the garden is a great saturday afternoon activity with the radio and a few beers

mawds

825 posts

263 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
if smoke's an issue, don't forget the gel blocks - no smoke, no smell, and produce water vapour.

personally, I'd go for wood, with coal in reserve for those cold nights when you need that extra "oomph".

greenlandy

1,635 posts

254 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
Go for wood every time and if you can get a multi fuel put in it'll kick out twice as much heat and the fuel will last longer. If you're moving to the country by a chainsaw, wood is then free. Cut it split it and leave it in a wood shed for a year before burning it, less tar so less sweeping I do mine once a year if it needs it or not.

love machine

7,609 posts

258 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
Logs, we generally buy them now but if a tree comes down it's a car and chainsaw job. Burning bought logs is not as cheap as you might think. Especially if you've got a few fires.

I'm lazy but a quick trip to the woods every week will generally sort you out with enough firewood, it's not a country scrooge thing, it's a traditional part of country life.

rude-boy

22,227 posts

256 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
IMO you can't beat laying down a good thick log or two of an evening