Insurance claim from drunk in stolen van
Insurance claim from drunk in stolen van
Author
Discussion

DaveH23

Original Poster:

3,355 posts

200 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
This is more just a how will this pan out and what would happen on a personal policy.

My brother has just been on the phone saying the building site he has been on today was visited by a drunk in a stolen van.

They were digging trenches and it was all fenced off etc as it would be and he wants to be through. He is told no and the police called.

This chap then decides to drive at them all through the fences and nearly looses the van in a trench.

A few minor injuries but nobody seriously injured.

He then starts shouting who's the vans on site are and starts smashing in to them in his van. A few work vans and a few council vans damaged in the process then he drives off.

A little later the Police turn up to take statements and confirm he was arrested not far away.

My question is what happens in the case of insurance claims for damaged vehicles here? As his van was stolen and he was drunk.

Who would claim off who etc?

R1 Indy

4,510 posts

213 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
I would imaging everyone would claim off the poor chap who had his van stolen, well his insurance.


ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

203 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
If the thief is identified (as in the guy driving is confirmed to have stolen the van) the insurance company for the van are liable.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

187 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
If the thief is identified (as in the guy driving is confirmed to have stolen the van) the insurance company for the van are liable.
Ah, okay. My bad.

velocefica

4,727 posts

138 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
Surprised he wasn't taken out by at least one of the tradesmen.

I thought it was compulsory in the UK that every building site has at least one tradesman experienced in the art of skull cracking

ant leigh

714 posts

173 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
After my previous car was stolen and written off I received a nice bill from Liverpool council for some damage to 'street furniture'
Passed on to my insurance company who sorted out the claim.
I guess the insurance company then attempt to get the money from the thief if they can be identified.


GC8

19,910 posts

220 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
ZOLLAR said:
If the thief is identified (as in the guy driving is confirmed to have stolen the van) the insurance company for the van are liable.
Ah, okay. My bad.
You weren't that far wrong. If the driver wasn't identified then theyd have to claim from the MIB.

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

203 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
GC8 said:
PurpleMoonlight said:
ZOLLAR said:
If the thief is identified (as in the guy driving is confirmed to have stolen the van) the insurance company for the van are liable.
Ah, okay. My bad.
You weren't that far wrong. If the driver wasn't identified then theyd have to claim from the MIB.
Indeed, that part is correct.

dacouch

1,172 posts

159 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
GC8 said:
You weren't that far wrong. If the driver wasn't identified then theyd have to claim from the MIB.
Although the MIB will pass it back to the Insurer of the vehicle to pay the claim if there was an Insurance Policy in place on the vehicle

TwigtheWonderkid

49,169 posts

180 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
dacouch said:
GC8 said:
You weren't that far wrong. If the driver wasn't identified then theyd have to claim from the MIB.
Although the MIB will pass it back to the Insurer of the vehicle to pay the claim if there was an Insurance Policy in place on the vehicle
No they won't. If the driver isn't identified, the MIB pay and do not involve the vehicle insurer. There are some circumstances where MIB go after insurers as the last insurer or current insurer involved, but this isn't one of them.

dacouch

1,172 posts

159 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
No they won't. If the driver isn't identified, the MIB pay and do not involve the vehicle insurer. There are some circumstances where MIB go after insurers as the last insurer or current insurer involved, but this isn't one of them.
The Insurer of the vehicle would be an "Article 75 Insurer" so it would be an MIB claim but the Insurer would pay it

Red Devil

13,527 posts

238 months

Wednesday 13th January 2016
quotequote all
The definitive answer can be found in sub paragraphs d) e) & g) on page 4 here - https://www.mib.org.uk/media/166920/2015-uninsured...

Lady Muck

1,184 posts

239 months

Wednesday 13th January 2016
quotequote all
ant leigh said:
After my previous car was stolen and written off I received a nice bill from Liverpool council for some damage to 'street furniture'
Passed on to my insurance company who sorted out the claim.
I guess the insurance company then attempt to get the money from the thief if they can be identified.
Totally off topic but I really cringe at the phrase Street Furniture. It brings to mind colourful sofas and fancy reading lamps lining the pavements, when in reality it's dull functional posts, dirty street signs and rusting grey lamp posts.

Anyway, as you were....

dacouch

1,172 posts

159 months

Wednesday 13th January 2016
quotequote all
Red Devil said:
The definitive answer can be found in sub paragraphs d) e) & g) on page 4 here - https://www.mib.org.uk/media/166920/2015-uninsured...
This is an informative explanation of Article 75 & Section 151 as well

http://www.12kbw.co.uk/userfiles/Documents/Motor_i...

Pasteurised

324 posts

182 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Surely the MIB would only get involved if the Drunk man was of extraterrestrial origin?

Mill Wheel

6,149 posts

226 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Lady Muck said:
Totally off topic but I really cringe at the phrase Street Furniture. It brings to mind colourful sofas and fancy reading lamps lining the pavements, when in reality it's dull functional posts, dirty street signs and rusting grey lamp posts.

Anyway, as you were....
Things are different in Windermere - we have £1000 cast aluminium and hardwood benches imported by Cumbria County Council from Texas, USA!!
Most have been destroyed by cars that accidentally bumped them while parking, breaking the aluminium castings, and unfortunately very few motorists involved report their accident and provide their insurance details.

Our locally made wooden benches provided by the civic society and local council fair much better and cost less - and can be easily repaired!

oldcynic

2,166 posts

191 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
GC8 said:
You weren't that far wrong. If the driver wasn't identified then theyd have to claim from the MIB.
On the contrary - the MIB refused to deal with the claim when my wife was hit by a Focus on cloned plates on the basis that the driver hadn't been identified. Finally an accident that 100% wasn't her fault and it still cost me excess/NCD/increased premiums.

furious

Mr Tidy

31,683 posts

157 months

Sunday 24th January 2016
quotequote all
oldcynic said:
On the contrary - the MIB refused to deal with the claim when my wife was hit by a Focus on cloned plates on the basis that the driver hadn't been identified. Finally an accident that 100% wasn't her fault and it still cost me excess/NCD/increased premiums.

furious
He may be right! MIB used to only deal with injury claims as the old RTA cover only required cover for third party personal injury, but then thanks to our EU membership an EU directive required compulsory third party property damage cover (Directive IV IIRC) so it depends when the incident you mention took place.

And regardless of whether the MIB "pay" the claim or require the vehicle insurer to pay it, in reality we all pay it - claims "paid" by the MIB are funded by a levy on all UK motor insurers and guess what, they divide that up among what they charge all of us law-abiding motorists.

So as in walks of life the honest, reasonable people pay for the feckless tw*ts as usual!