Am i right or wrong here?
Am i right or wrong here?
Author
Discussion

R1 Indy

Original Poster:

4,510 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
I am an electrician, and used to also do CCTV, all under one Ltd company.

Due to the high turnover from the CCTV i had to register for VAT, In order to stay competitive i had to reduce my labour rate by 20%, so my total labour rate was the same as before, just 20% went to HMRC rather than my pocket!

A little while ago i decided CCTV was not for me and stopped doing it, my turnover is now below the threshold, so have just de-registered for Vat, so have essentially now increased my labour rate by 20%. However i now can't reclaim the Vat on tools/van consumables/fuel etc, so I'm not 20% better off!


I quoted for a job 6 months ago for a domestic customer, this included Vat as i was registered at this time.

I have just completed this job, and just pointed out that the invoice will be the same total amount as quoted, but there will be no Vat as i am now not registered.


He is now adamant that he does not need to pay the Vat, as i am now Vat registered. I tried explaining several times that my rates have now increases by 20%, but its made absolutely no difference to the quoted price.


So am i right or wrong here? I don't see what bloody difference it makes to the domestic customer?

Adamski69

175 posts

141 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
I am with you here. tell him fine, just remove 20% of the work you have done and tell him he can have it back when he pays the bill for the amount he agreed too regardless of whether vat was applicable or not.

Or for peace sake, have a deal, meet him half way so he gets a 'discount' move on with your life and next time stay schtumm and just present the bill for works carried out.

softtop

3,172 posts

278 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
I am with the customer on this one. You were happy to do the work for that rate with VAT on and now you have deregistered quite conveniently your rates have gone up by 20%.

What was your quotation validity?

bitchstewie

68,232 posts

241 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
I would be the same as the customer. How can you retrospectively raise your labour rate by 20%

Quite possible I've totally misunderstood how VAT works in which case I'll go crawl under a rock.

Magic919

14,575 posts

232 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
If you quoted, say, £1200 with no mention of VAT, I'd expect to pay it. If I was quoted £1000 plus VAT and the trader de-registered, I'd expect to pay the ex-VAT price.

It's best to discuss this at the point the customer takes up the quote, IMO. Might be one to chalk up to experience.

alfie2244

11,292 posts

219 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Quoted 6 months previous.......did you re-quote and advise no Vat but 20% rate increase?

If not then I am with the customer I'm afraid as contract was for X + V.A.T. Just my opinion but word of mouth is the best advertising you can get and can also do a lot of damage to a small business.


jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

243 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
I agree with those two ^^^, and the customer. You've invoiced a certain rate and price for a job and that's what I'd expect to pay. If you've de-registered for VAT then that element must be removed from the invoice, but I wouldn't expect to have to pay a rate increase at the same time.

Essentially you're asking for 20% more for the job as you'll be pocketing the cash.

jonamv8

3,300 posts

197 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Magic919 said:
If you quoted, say, £1200 with no mention of VAT, I'd expect to pay it. If I was quoted £1000 plus VAT and the trader de-registered, I'd expect to pay the ex-VAT price.

It's best to discuss this at the point the customer takes up the quote, IMO. Might be one to chalk up to experience.
^^^^ this if I was a personal buyer. Slightly different if it was my VAT reg LTD paying

Mandat

4,646 posts

269 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Technically, I think that your customer is correct, insofar as the quotation included VAT, which you now don't have to account for with HMRC, and which was never your money in the first place. Consequently, the customer should not be paying the VAT element of your bill if you are no longer VAT registered.


plasticpig

12,932 posts

256 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Another vote for the customers point of view.

R1 Indy

Original Poster:

4,510 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Ok looks like I'm on my own here....

Personally if i was a customer, all i would look at is the total price(and my thoughts on the trader), I wouldn't give a damn if there was vat or not, as it makes no difference, all that matters is the price i pay.

perhaps would be best to try to strike a deal then.

And just a domestic customer, if it was a business customer i would of definatly made it clear.

TBH the Vat element (or my increase in rates) on labour was only around £60 so not end of the world, but surely he should still pay the full amount for materials as i can no longer claim this back?


Doofus

34,582 posts

204 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
When you quoted him, you should have specified the net and vVAT seperately (assuming he is VAT registered)

If he's not VAT registered, then his cost would have been your gross quote. If he is registered, then his cost would have been your net figure.

Either way, you shouldn't expect him to accept an increase of 20% (not actually 20%, but that's maths for you) without negotiaton. Whether or not it actually makes any difference to him depends upon his registration status, and upon whether your new, higher labour rate is actually competitive, VAT notwithstanding.

R1 Indy

Original Poster:

4,510 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
To put this into simple terms:

I used to charge £25/Hour (going rate for a spark)

When i had to register for Vat, I reduced my fee to £20.83 + Vat to remain competitive, but this hurt me financially!!

I have now reverted to £25/Hour, the going rate.


Simpo Two

93,022 posts

296 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
R1 Indy said:
I have just completed this job, and just pointed out that the invoice will be the same total amount as quoted, but there will be no Vat as i am now not registered.
I think this is where you went wrong. If you'd said nothing he might have paid the sum quoted!

bitchstewie

68,232 posts

241 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
R1 Indy said:
To put this into simple terms:

I used to charge £25/Hour (going rate for a spark)

When i had to register for Vat, I reduced my fee to £20.83 + Vat to remain competitive, but this hurt me financially!!

I have now reverted to £25/Hour, the going rate.
So someone comes along tomorrow you quote £25/hr.

You don't tell the guy you quoted £20.83/hr a week ago that he now has to pay £25.

R1 Indy

Original Poster:

4,510 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
I think this is where you went wrong. If you'd said nothing he might have paid the sum quoted!
Yep, try to do the right thing (after realising i should have said before work commenced), and it bites you in the arse!

alfie2244

11,292 posts

219 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
R1 Indy said:
To put this into simple terms:

I used to charge £25/Hour (going rate for a spark)

When i had to register for Vat, I reduced my fee to £20.83 + Vat to remain competitive, but this hurt me financially!!

I have now reverted to £25/Hour, the going rate.
No offence but I think, and most others fully understood so no need to make it simpler.

In the scheme of things I would suck it up. As a guess it's about £100....really not worth the upset to be honest, (not to mention dodgy comments on fkbook etc

BrownBottle

1,416 posts

167 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Explain to them that you can no longer claim vat back on the materials hence they will be more expensive than the previous pre-vat price given.

Stick to the pre-vat labour price and add the vat from the materials onto the bill, the customer still gets a cheaper job overall than they first agreed to and you don't get shafted for the vat on the materials.


alfie2244

11,292 posts

219 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
BrownBottle said:
Explain to them that you can no longer claim vat back on the materials hence they will be more expensive than the previous pre-vat price given.

Stick to the pre-vat labour price and add the vat from the materials onto the bill, the customer still gets a cheaper job overall than they first agreed to and you don't get shafted for the vat on the materials.
Which could open another potential "can of worms".... did he separate Lab & mats in quote?.... Did he mark them up himself? If so by how much?...will they ask for sight of the invoices?

FWIW I would forget the VAT but, subtly, point out that you have, in effect lost that money.........customer may make an offer but if not then put it down to experience would be my honest advice.

BrownBottle

1,416 posts

167 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
It's perfectly reasonable to charge materials out at retail price if he is getting a trade discount, it's how people make money.

If all he adds on to the previous pre-vat price is the vat on the materials (retail) then he is being perfectly fair.