Police Officer Nearly 3 Times Over The Limit.
Discussion
You would have thought he know better !!
Poor show to be honest
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2016/01/2...
Poor show to be honest
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2016/01/2...
chippy348 said:
You would have thought he know better !!
Poor show to be honest
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2016/01/2...
Everyone know's better. I'm not sure if a Policeman is any better or worse.Poor show to be honest
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2016/01/2...
surveyor said:
Everyone know's better. I'm not sure if a Policeman is any better or worse.
I would hope that a Policeman whose role has seen him speak at numerous inquests and court cases around driving offences and saw him take a leading role in the force's annual crackdown on festive drink-driving would know better.rewc said:
surveyor said:
Everyone know's better. I'm not sure if a Policeman is any better or worse.
I would hope that a Policeman whose role has seen him speak at numerous inquests and court cases around driving offences and saw him take a leading role in the force's annual crackdown on festive drink-driving would know better.surveyor said:
rewc said:
surveyor said:
Everyone know's better. I'm not sure if a Policeman is any better or worse.
I would hope that a Policeman whose role has seen him speak at numerous inquests and court cases around driving offences and saw him take a leading role in the force's annual crackdown on festive drink-driving would know better.Regardless of him knowing better or not, it makes him a big hypocrite.
Although you can never be sure, he looks like he's not too far from retiring. The pension (he would be on if so) is heavily weighted towards the last years of service. That'd be a much bigger hit than the DD conviction.
Although you can never be sure, he looks like he's not too far from retiring. The pension (he would be on if so) is heavily weighted towards the last years of service. That'd be a much bigger hit than the DD conviction.
La Liga said:
Regardless of him knowing better or not, it makes him a big hypocrite.
Although you can never be sure, he looks like he's not too far from retiring. The pension (he would be on if so) is heavily weighted towards the last years of service. That'd be a much bigger hit than the DD conviction.
That's if he loses his job of course. Although you can never be sure, he looks like he's not too far from retiring. The pension (he would be on if so) is heavily weighted towards the last years of service. That'd be a much bigger hit than the DD conviction.
Or is that a certainty now?
R8Steve said:
La Liga said:
Regardless of him knowing better or not, it makes him a big hypocrite.
Although you can never be sure, he looks like he's not too far from retiring. The pension (he would be on if so) is heavily weighted towards the last years of service. That'd be a much bigger hit than the DD conviction.
That's if he loses his job of course. Although you can never be sure, he looks like he's not too far from retiring. The pension (he would be on if so) is heavily weighted towards the last years of service. That'd be a much bigger hit than the DD conviction.
Or is that a certainty now?
La Liga said:
would think it's a certainty unless there are exceptional, extreme circumstances. Once the criminal matter has been dealt with the misconduct can be progressed.
It was automatic in my force unless there were strong mitigating circumstances. This was challenged and so it became conditional, although it remained, in effect, automatic. Sympathy rather than gloating in order. I don't condone his actions but the whole divorce and living in a section house at his age suggests a car crash of a life and an individual struggling to cope with it.
Fair enough, the crime is the crime and the consequences are the consequences but there is no cause for celebration.
A percentage of the population have drink and substance abuse problems, a percentage will be child abusers, a percentage are morally corrupt. As such, the Police will have a proportion of staff who will let them down. We shouldn't be surprised, we shouldn't gloat and we shouldn't assume that the actions of individuals reflect the standards of police officers in general. People are people and do what they do.
Fair enough, the crime is the crime and the consequences are the consequences but there is no cause for celebration.
A percentage of the population have drink and substance abuse problems, a percentage will be child abusers, a percentage are morally corrupt. As such, the Police will have a proportion of staff who will let them down. We shouldn't be surprised, we shouldn't gloat and we shouldn't assume that the actions of individuals reflect the standards of police officers in general. People are people and do what they do.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



