Is this a compliment or an implied criticism?
Is this a compliment or an implied criticism?
Author
Discussion

Derish

Original Poster:

159 posts

127 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Hi,

I'd like to hear your opinion on a feedback letter I got following a job interview. This was the job:
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

This was the feedback:

Dear Pistonhead, thank you for attending your recent interview (...) we will not be pursuing your application further.

The feedback I have received from your interview is that you came across as very self confident and you do have relevant qualifications for the position. You have a clear vision for your future but the interviewers weren't confident that this would be a long term career move for yourself. As you are currently studying at University, you advised that you would only be available for 15 months before returning to university to finish your studies. As a result, we are unable to progress your application at this time as it will take a longer period of time to develop someone to become a "technical specialist" to the desired level.

Now, I might just be paranoid and reading too much into it, but as a foreigner I sometimes miss the nuances of British irony. So I'd like to understand - when they say "you came across as very self confident" - do they mean it as a compliment, or is this a subtle way of calling me an arrogant prick? scratchchin

Probably not a reason to hold myself back either way, but I am curious. What do you think, based on the evidence?

Edited by Derish on Saturday 2nd April 02:16

Funk

27,639 posts

238 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Possibly, although I don't think they're being that nuanced with it as it's not the reason they didn't take things further. Normally you'd expect to hear, "...you came across as very confident..", possibly "...you came across confidently.." or even as "self-assured".

Either way it's probably moot; it sounds like you conducted yourself well but the fact you told them it would only be short-term was what lost it.

HD Adam

5,155 posts

213 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
I'd say that was a compliment.

The reason for not getting the job is clearly stated. You said you can only give them 15 months and they are looking longer term.

Don't say that at the next interview wink

cootuk

918 posts

152 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Seems to me that they are being complimentary and you would have been considered further,
however you shot yourself in the foot by limiting your availability.

Robertj21a

18,009 posts

134 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Quite agree with the other posters. It was intended as a compliment, but your availability was a key problem for them.

Spunktrumpet

6,115 posts

227 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Agree with above, seems like the reason being given is the short term basis.

Jasandjules

72,569 posts

258 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
They believe it will take them longer than 15 months to get someone up to full training. You won't be there after that. You are therefore not suitable for them.


FredClogs

14,041 posts

190 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
They liked you, they just wanted someone who'll stick around for more than 15 months. You're lucky to get that level of feedback post interview to be honest.

essayer

10,410 posts

223 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
You're lucky to get that level of feedback post interview to be honest.
Agreed, that's a compliment in itself!

karona

1,928 posts

215 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
On a 'creative writing' course, back in the days when people actually wrote on paper, with a pen, we were taught to emphasise the positives first, before introducing bad news.

That letter reads as "you are good, but ....." , right out of the creative writing manual.

5potTurbo

13,658 posts

197 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Don't take it personally. The HR muppet tried to be clever and it's not worked entirely, e.g., "yourself" instead of "you"
Well done for getting a reply though!

coopedup

3,742 posts

168 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
As others have said, voicing your limited time frame there was your downfall

Robbo 27

4,279 posts

128 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
A compliment, if you were going for the job of a Librarian or midwife or a job with the samaritans you may want to tone down the confidence

so called

9,160 posts

238 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
When you say you are a foreigner, is this because your from West Yorkshire ?

Magic919

14,457 posts

230 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Was this Ricoh?

Derish

Original Poster:

159 posts

127 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
so called said:
When you say you are a foreigner, is this because your from West Yorkshire ?
No, a bit further out. laugh

Thanks for all the replies, you've put my mind at ease.

I'm usually upfront about the time limit, as these are customer-facing jobs that do require some degree of stability. That said, I mentioned in the interview that after the 15-month period I won't be going away, just switching to part time employment for a while and then coming back. I'm also well aware of how long it actually takes to train a 'technical specialist' in this field, as I've been doing similar jobs for the last decade. It would have taken 3-6 months, leaving plenty of time to be productive.

I hear a lot about how it's difficult to recruit talent in organisations, but when talent knocks them on the front door and asks for some flexibility - most managers just don't have the capacity to see the big picture or think long term. If you can't give them exactly what they're looking for at the moment, they're just not interested. And while that's perfectly acceptable, it's also not the kind of manager or company I want to work for, so the search continues...

Final point about the HR person - I was also surprised to get this feedback. They actually teach this now in HR courses (I did one last year) that you have to turn people down with a proper explanation, but I dismissed it as academic fluff that would never happen in the real world... yet there you have it. I've applied for jobs in several countries in the past, and nowhere has the (negative) answer been so quick and detailed, so for this Ricoh UK deserve a pint.



Edited by Derish on Saturday 2nd April 12:13

ecsrobin

18,644 posts

194 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Derish said:
so called said:
When you say you are a foreigner, is this because your from West Yorkshire ?
No, a bit further out. laugh

Thanks for all the replies, you've put my mind at ease.

I'm usually upfront about the time limit, as these are customer-facing jobs that do require some degree of stability. That said, I mentioned in the interview that after the 15-month period I won't be going away, just switching to part time employment for a while and then coming back. I'm also well aware of how long it actually takes to train a 'technical specialist' in this field, as I've been doing similar jobs for the last decade. It would have taken 3-6 months, leaving plenty of time to be productive.

I hear a lot about how it's difficult to recruit talent in organisations, but when talent knocks them on the front door and asks for some flexibility - most managers just don't have the capacity to see the big picture or think long term. If you can't give them exactly what they're looking for at the moment, they're just not interested. And while that's perfectly acceptable, it's also not the kind of manager or company I want to work for, so the search continues...

Final point about the HR person - I was also surprised to get this feedback. They actually teach this now in HR courses (I did one last year) that you have to turn people down with a proper explanation, but I dismissed it as academic fluff that would never happen in the real world... yet there you have it. I've applied for jobs in several countries in the past, and nowhere has the (negative) answer been so quick and detailed, so for this Ricoh UK deserve a pint.



Edited by Derish on Saturday 2nd April 12:13
They will no doubt have hundreds of applicants to choose from so if it's you vs someone who has not stated a wish to go part time who do you think they will pick?

If it was me I would have not mentioned any of that hopefully got the job and with 6 months to go I would have requested that I go part time to complete the uni course. They are likely to be more flexible then as they have invested time in you.

Derish

Original Poster:

159 posts

127 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
In this case they were looking for someone to manage a local 'enclave' reporting directly to the Netherlands. I could offer them several advantages over the local crowd due to my family status and some past experience working with the Dutch and the Flemish. I know there were a few dozen other candidates, but if if they ended up hiring a UK native - may the force be with them.

Like I said, this situation was a good filter for them as well as for me. If they can't be flexible in 2016, it's a red flag. Flexibility is important these days, and so is long term thinking and strategic HR management. Corporations are the ones hurting the most from lack of young managers in the pipeline, and this was a good opportunity for Ricoh to take one on board for future development. They preferred to concentrate on the task and the dept. at hand, time will tell how smart of a decision it was.

CoolHands

23,362 posts

224 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
I read the original job advert https://www.linkedin.com/jobs2/view/108082918

I must be getting old cos I can't see what you actually have to do in the job. Wharra load of puff & nonsense.

mcgandalf

666 posts

184 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Is Telford a nice place to live as a new graduate?