This months EVO

[Graham B]

Not sure if this has been posted before but there is a nice piece on the Cerbera in this months EVO.

£20K Drivers cars - new golf gti and scooby WRX versus used TVR Cerbera, M5, Exige, Skyline, NSX and Cossie. And the winner is ....won't spoil it for you .

[TT Tim]

Graham B said:

£20K Drivers cars - new golf gti and scooby WRX versus used TVR Cerbera, M5, Exige, Skyline, NSX and Cossie. And the winner is ....won't spoil it for you .

Oi, shut-up, I want to buy a Cerbera soon, and this kind of advertising can only bump prices up!

Tim

[trooperiziz]

Graham B said:

£20K Drivers cars - new golf gti and scooby WRX versus used TVR Cerbera, M5, Exige, Skyline, NSX and Cossie. And the winner is...

... a 911

[white_van_man]

there was a good bit in there on the tuscan 2

[richb]

trooperiziz said:

Graham B said: £20K Drivers cars - new golf gti and scooby WRX versus used TVR Cerbera, M5, Exige, Skyline, NSX and Cossie. And the winner is... ... a 911

[jonnyb]

This is EVO! of course the 911 won.

>> Edited by jonnyb on Friday 25th February 15:37

[groucho]

Don't get mine to the first Wednesday of the month. I'll look forward to that then.

[TT Tim]

I just can't see a 911 as a Supercar, although it may have Supercar speed and a price tag to match. I just see them like arseholes...


...everyone's got one.

and if they haven't got one they've got a Boxter while they save up for a real one.

Sorry to all you 911 fans but a Porkers not for me.

Tim

[TRACKDEMON]

trooperiziz said:

Graham B said: £20K Drivers cars - new golf gti and scooby WRX versus used TVR Cerbera, M5, Exige, Skyline, NSX and Cossie. And the winner is... ... a 911

They used my car for the article, I commented to Richard Meaden that they didn't have a 911 because it'd obviously win. Oh, how we laughed

[anonymous-user]

Pretty positive about the Tuscan 2. But then all the articles I have seen have been, and rightly so. He did seem confused about the engine though. Kept calling it a 4.0 when it's a 3.6.

[chris watton]

Gazboy said:

unrepentant said: Pretty positive about the Tuscan 2. But then all the articles I have seen have been, and rightly so. He did seem confused about the engine though. Kept calling it a 4.0 when it's a 3.6. Does the standard car have the 3.6, and the S have a 4.0? Or are they both 3.6's?

Yes, well, from what I can gather, the standard cars now all have the 3.6 and the 'S' versions have the breathed on 4 litre engine, which makes one wonder what's happened to the standard 4 litre engine!

[J_S_G]

chris watton said:

Gazboy said: unrepentant said: Pretty positive about the Tuscan 2. But then all the articles I have seen have been, and rightly so. He did seem confused about the engine though. Kept calling it a 4.0 when it's a 3.6. Does the standard car have the 3.6, and the S have a 4.0? Or are they both 3.6's? Yes, well, from what I can gather, the standard cars now all have the 3.6 and the 'S' versions have the breathed on 4 litre engine, which makes one wonder what's happened to the standard 4 litre engine!

Wasn't good from a marketing perspective to have two engines the same size in the "entry level" and "top of the range" cars, from what I heard.