Lib Dem Tax plans
Author
Discussion

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,734 posts

264 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
It is a constant source of amazement to me that the Lib Dems are regarded as a 'Centrist' party between Labour and the Tories.

They have just published their tax proposals-new 50% taxband for those earning 100K and above and a new local income tax to replace council tax-which will result in one in four families being £50 a year worse off and one in ten being £500 a year
worse off.

Why do not simply rename themselves the Communist party they defile the name 'Liberal' by it being associated with their party.

Incorrigible

13,668 posts

290 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
I'm in 2 minds about it

On one side I like the fact they're attempting to bring in a simple and transparent system, not the complete fk up that Labour (and to a lesser extent the previous tories)

OTOH they do seem to be a bigger bunch of lunatic control freaks than the current lot

v8thunder

27,647 posts

287 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
There was a programme the other day when some of the 'key worker' types they were after - some hard-up medical students sharing a house somewhere - went on their website to find out how much they'd save under the Lib Dems, and found out they'd actually be paying £1700 per year more.

The Lib Dems want everyone to live like ascetics - only what you need, nothing of what you want. This type of policy and attitude does absolutely nothing for this country's aspirations.

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,734 posts

264 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
v8thunder said:
There was a programme the other day when some of the 'key worker' types they were after - some hard-up medical students sharing a house somewhere - went on their website to find out how much they'd save under the Lib Dems, and found out they'd actually be paying £1700 per year more.

The Lib Dems want everyone to live like ascetics - only what you need, nothing of what you want. This type of policy and attitude does absolutely nothing for this country's aspirations.


That illustrates perfectly who is going to get sc**wed by a local income tax-the young

minornut

1,049 posts

266 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
For those who wish to induce a heart attack


www.axe-the-tax.org.uk/page.php?taxcalculator

titiany

2,122 posts

261 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
v8thunder said:
The Lib Dems want everyone to live like ascetics - only what you need, nothing of what you want. This type of policy and attitude does absolutely nothing for this country's aspirations.


Asceticism exactly.

There's no incentive to do well in life with these people.

You'd be, relatively speaking, better off sat at home unemployed with 6 kids, than out earning a 6-figure salary.

In this case if I were a lazy bum, I'd be smiling.

lunarscope

2,901 posts

271 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
"Your tax bill would be higher than under Council Tax. You would pay £522 more per year. Many lower income households would benefit."

That's ok then.

I'll be paying over £500 more per year for my one binbag to be collected each week.


>> Edited by lunarscope on Tuesday 1st March 12:56

thub

1,359 posts

313 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
£75 a month more when the only direct service I receive is to have one bag of rubbish collected each week.

And how the hell will they administer the local income tax? That's going to consume an awful lot of the income.

edited to add that Lunarscope and I seem to be in a similar position...

>> Edited by thub on Tuesday 1st March 12:58

v8thunder

27,647 posts

287 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:

v8thunder said:
There was a programme the other day when some of the 'key worker' types they were after - some hard-up medical students sharing a house somewhere - went on their website to find out how much they'd save under the Lib Dems, and found out they'd actually be paying £1700 per year more.

The Lib Dems want everyone to live like ascetics - only what you need, nothing of what you want. This type of policy and attitude does absolutely nothing for this country's aspirations.



That illustrates perfectly who is going to get sc**wed by a local income tax-the young


Precisely, ie ME! My problem is that they've managed to con most people my age into thinking they'd be good for them.

What amazes me is the fact that they've increased the tax burden all round, just shifted amounts here and there. They say they'd get rid of council tax and bring in local income tax. Well, you know what this means? The closer you live to other people or in a city, the more you pay, and you're more likely to find the young and the poor in the cities, which will just create a rush to the country, but of course you won't be able to drive into the city from your country place, because the Lib Dems will not let you in unless your car runs on the blood of OPEC executives.

Also, you'll get companies avoiding handing out bonuses and pay rises to in turn avoid heavier taxation, so the company itself will retain more money, in effect, making these corporations richer.

They say they'll abolish university tuition fees and they opposed top-up fees. That's what they tell you. What they want instead is a graduate tax. Yep, that's right, as you struggle to get a job they'll drain money out of you (which may or may not be proportionate depending on their monthly overspend) almost as a punishment for aspiring when you need the money the most.

The Tories say they'll abolish tuition fees and get rid of 'unnecessary' university courses, and they mean it. Unfortunately the blinkered students will all vote for the shirts off their backs, and not the Tories because of 'what they did' 10-20 years ago.

IMO there should be a ban on pre-election publicity say, 2 weeks before polling day. Some time in those two weeks, an independant body posts a plain-English copy of each party's manifesto through every door in the country. No spin, no false promises, just what each party WILL do and will be obliged to complete if they win the election.

And then we'll see who comes out on top.

v8thunder

27,647 posts

287 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
lunarscope said:
"Your tax bill would be higher than under Council Tax. You would pay £522 more per year. Many lower income households would benefit."


In short, "You'll work harder for less, but a nice chunk of your earnings will go to someone who didn't work for it. We hope you are happy. Good day."

jimothy

5,151 posts

266 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Looks like I'll be forking out an extra £900 so the council tenants opposite can carry on scrounging. Makes me feel glad that I worked hard, chose a profitable career path etc.

Fk it, tonight I'll get the missus up the duff then sponge of the state. More money, easier life.

b17nns

18,506 posts

276 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
minornut said:
For those who wish to induce a heart attack


www.axe-the-tax.org.uk/page.php?taxcalculator


"Your tax bill would be higher than under Council Tax. You would pay £582 more per year. Many lower income households would benefit."

Oh thats allright then

judas

6,234 posts

288 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Closet commies said:
Your tax bill would be higher than under Council Tax. You would pay £444 more per year. Many lower income households would benefit.


Well, there's a ing suprise!

zcacogp

11,239 posts

273 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Daft Party Who I Won't Be Voting For said:
Your tax bill would be higher than under Council Tax. You would pay £2,307 more per year. Many lower income households would benefit.

Kind of narrows the choice, doesn't it?

Oli.

v8thunder

27,647 posts

287 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
You're never going to believe this.

I put in details for the average graduate job - £15k a year, single adult, no kids etc, in short, the very least I can expect.

I'd be forking out an extra £613.

Tried to fob me off by saying that 75% of the population were poorer than me and that I was in a privleged position.

Yep, I worked bloody hard and I'm not even in that 'privleged position' yet, and already you're virtually taking the edge off that 'privleged position' through sheer statistics.

If I even meet Vincent Cable, I'll give him a few lessons in Mental Arithmetic. Emphasis on the 'Mental'.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
minornut said:
For those who wish to induce a heart attack


www.axe-the-tax.org.uk/page.php?taxcalculator


Just done that.

site said:

Your tax bill would be higher than under Council Tax. You would pay £85 more per year. Many lower income households would benefit.


Well bully for them!

I work, achieve a decent reward and get taxed to buggery meanwhile the dolescum on the local council estate get a tax break for being bone idle.

Will I be voting DemLibs? Will I bollox.

mechsympathy

58,536 posts

284 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
Unsurprisingly the Lib Dems said said:
Your tax bill would be higher than under Council Tax. You would pay £1,819 more per year. Many lower income households would benefit.


What a bunch of tssers


Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
1819 more!

SHIT!

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

277 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
£420 worth of reasons to say F*** You!

lunarscope

2,901 posts

271 months

Tuesday 1st March 2005
quotequote all
In my case the break-even point is £21800 salary per year. So, according to the Office of National Statistics, a below-average earner will be paying more under the Lib-Dem proposals.