Right lads, We've got a problem, its called Lotus.
Right lads, We've got a problem, its called Lotus.
Author
Discussion

DJC

Original Poster:

23,563 posts

265 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
The buggers have just released a Supercharged Exige.

243bhp £44k. Only 50 to be made called the 240R.

So, Sagaris £50k or Nutter Exige at £43k.
Both sub 4secs to 60, 9-10secs for 100.


Now what the hell do I do?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Buy a VXR and spend about £5K on it taking it up to Stage 3

260bhp odd and 290 odd ft/lbs of torque which is only a few less than the Lotus Sport Elise...

Bye bye 240R

>> Edited by Plotloss on Wednesday 2nd March 17:42

PetrolTed

34,468 posts

332 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
I think most TVR owners are in it for outright power, rather than speed through "lightness".

angusfaldo

2,831 posts

303 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
PetrolTed said:
I think most TVR owners are in it for outright power, rather than speed through "lightness".


I agree. I always thought TVR ownership was about bragging rights when discussing BHP down the pub.

Hence TVR's hugely over-inflated fugures. They obviously marketed with this key ownerhisp requirement in mind

Martin_S

9,939 posts

274 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Buy a VXR and spend about £5K on it taking it up to Stage 3

260bhp odd and 290 odd ft/lbs of torque which is only a few less than the Lotus Sport Elise...

Bye bye 240R



[nasal, whining voice]My name's Nigel, and I drive a Vauxhall[/nasal, whining voice]

Don

28,378 posts

313 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Martin_S said:

[nasal, whining voice]My name's Nigel, and I drive a Vauxhall[/nasal, whining voice]


Pah! Its a fine machine. They are chuffing fast when well driven on track days - really, really, chuffing "I can't keep up in a Caterham" fast.

ncs

3,974 posts

311 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
I looked at the Exige on Saturday down at Dream Machines.

Thats all I did, I could have driven it but theres no point - I just cant get in & out of the bloody thing!

Has to be the Sagaris then

Nick

tvrolet

4,746 posts

311 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
angusfaldo said:

PetrolTed said:
I think most TVR owners are in it for outright power, rather than speed through "lightness".



I agree. I always thought TVR ownership was about bragging rights when discussing BHP down the pub.

Hence TVR's hugely over-inflated fugures. They obviously marketed with this key ownerhisp requirement in mind


Only on Cerb 4.5 though

We did a rolling road session last year for the Central Scotland TVRCC folks, and most of the cars were pretty close on the money. IIRC the Cerb 4.2s were 340-365, a T350 at 380ish, Griffs in the low 300s, Chimaera 400s at about 200. Only the Cerb 4.5s seems to be way off.

But back to the post, yup 250BHP in what I guess must be about 850Kg sounds OK, but I'd rather have 380BHP in 1250KG...about same power-to-weight but lots more grunt. Bet it sounds nicer too than a supercharged four.

Actually, I lie, I'd rather have 500BHP in 900Kg but that's another story


WB

Big Al.

69,336 posts

287 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Forget all that b*ll*x about BHP and all that, at least you can get in and out of Saggy.

washy

950 posts

305 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
I was thinking the same thing. However, Sagaris is around 15% heavier than the 240R with 65% more power. Good value at a premium of £10K. Also, the 240 will be tiny inside by comparison. Not really a contest in my opinion and I think a will sorted Sagaris will be quick on track too.

Martin_S

9,939 posts

274 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Don said:

Martin_S said:

[nasal, whining voice]My name's Nigel, and I drive a Vauxhall[/nasal, whining voice]



Pah! Its a fine machine. They are chuffing fast when well driven on track days - really, really, chuffing "I can't keep up in a Caterham" fast.


Yes, but if we were just interested in driving fast, we wouldn't own TVR's.

A standard Elise 111S will piss all over most TVR's on any sort of demanding, twisty road...you don't need to spend £40-odd-K on a supercharged Exige.

Lets be honest, at least part of it is about image and bragging rights, and the Vauxhall badge just doesn't work, even if it is fixed to the front of a turbo'd Lotus.

Nuggs

4,640 posts

263 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
DJC said:
The buggers have just released a Supercharged Exige.


Great, I can get to the salon even quicker...

Martin_S

9,939 posts

274 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Nuggs said:

DJC said:
The buggers have just released a Supercharged Exige.



Great, I can get to the salon even quicker...



Oh, now come on!

From any one else, fair enough, but from a former MGF owner?

CraigAlsop

1,991 posts

297 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Martin_S said:
A standard Elise 111S will piss all over most TVR's on any sort of demanding, twisty road...you don't need to spend £40-odd-K on a supercharged Exige.
People always say this, but the reality is that a well driven Elise 180 was having real problems keeping up with a gaggle of TVRs over in Northern Ireland last year at the last Celtic bash. (Even old Wedges were doing better)
This was on typical country roads - why? Cos whenever there was anything to overtake, it just didn't have enough grunt to do so as safely.
Seriously, it was having a hard time keeping up with some of our more "sedate" elder drivers in Wedges & S's.
It had no chance at all with the Chims, Griffs, Tuscans & Tamoras.

Yes it could probably carry a few more MPH through the corners, but it couldn't make the most of the real world opportunities (and it wasn't like the roads where that busy)

Don't get me wrong - I think that they are great cars, but they just need more power & a boot (not a briefcase)

Nuggs

4,640 posts

263 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Martin_S said:

Nuggs said:

Great, I can get to the salon even quicker...

Oh, now come on!

From any one else, fair enough, but from a former MGF owner?


No, really, I meant it.

R666 TUS

1,052 posts

269 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
I like having carpet too

Martin_S

9,939 posts

274 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
CraigAlsop said:

Martin_S said:
A standard Elise 111S will piss all over most TVR's on any sort of demanding, twisty road...you don't need to spend £40-odd-K on a supercharged Exige.

People always say this, but the reality is that a well driven Elise 180 was having real problems keeping up with a gaggle of TVRs over in Northern Ireland last year at the last Celtic bash. (Even old Wedges were doing better)
This was on typical country roads - why? Cos whenever there was anything to overtake, it just didn't have enough grunt to do so as safely.
Seriously, it was having a hard time keeping up with some of our more "sedate" elder drivers in Wedges & S's.
It had no chance at all with the Chims, Griffs, Tuscans & Tamoras.

Yes it could probably carry a few more MPH through the corners, but it couldn't make the most of the real world opportunities (and it wasn't like the roads where that busy)

Don't get me wrong - I think that they are great cars, but they just need more power & a boot (not a briefcase)


I can only say that having gone directly from an S1 Elise to a Griffith 500, I can't match the sort of cross-country times I used to be able to set in the Elise. The Griffith is much quicker in a straight line, but on the twisty roads that I consider to be fun and challenging, the cornering balance of the Griffith is so inferior that the extra power counts for nothing.

In certain circumstances (fast, sweeping roads with - as you say - ample overtaking opportunities), then the Griffith might be able to open up a gap by overtaking in marginal situations that an Elise couldn't match. But then, I don't tend to overtake in marginal situations...

Also, maybe I'm just being cautious, but I always 'feed' in the power when I overtake from low speed in the Griffith...hit a greasy patch and the thought of going sideways half way through an overtaking manoeuvre with a limited gap and oncoming traffic doesn't appeal. With the Elise, I knew that 'sideways' always meant just a twitch of the steering to correct, not a potential spin, so I was happier using all of the available performance.

An Elise 180 is a pretty highly-strung animal, incedentally, and rather unsuitable for road use, IMHO. It would be quick on a circuit, but in any sort of road driving, it would need pretty exeptional circumstances to make it quicker than a standard 120bhp base model Elise, let alone a 111S - you simply wouldn't be able to keep it 'on the boil' for enough of the time.

If Lotus produce an Elise/Exige that can match the TVR's acceleration, then the TIV would have no ace left to play and would be left floundering under all circumstances.

TVR's have many other advantages over Lotus: looks, noise, interior comfort, exclusivity, practicality, etc, etc, but I honestly don't think they can compete as a point-to-point tool.

Having said all which, I don't really think that a supercharged Exige is a threat to TVR in sales terms. The cars are so different in ethos that I don't imagine there is much overlap in the user groups.

N17 TVR

2,937 posts

300 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
PetrolTed said:
I think most TVR owners are in it for outright power, rather than speed through "lightness".


The unbearable lightness of being..........

nubbin

6,809 posts

307 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
Martin_S said:


I can only say that having gone directly from an S1 Elise to a Griffith 500, I can't match the sort of cross-country times I used to be able to set in the Elise. The Griffith is much quicker in a straight line, but on the twisty roads that I consider to be fun and challenging, the cornering balance of the Griffith is so inferior that the extra power counts for nothing.

In certain circumstances (fast, sweeping roads with - as you say - ample overtaking opportunities), then the Griffith might be able to open up a gap by overtaking in marginal situations that an Elise couldn't match. But then, I don't tend to overtake in marginal situations...

Also, maybe I'm just being cautious, but I always 'feed' in the power when I overtake from low speed in the Griffith...hit a greasy patch and the thought of going sideways half way through an overtaking manoeuvre with a limited gap and oncoming traffic doesn't appeal. With the Elise, I knew that 'sideways' always meant just a twitch of the steering to correct, not a potential spin, so I was happier using all of the available performance.

An Elise 180 is a pretty highly-strung animal, incedentally, and rather unsuitable for road use, IMHO. It would be quick on a circuit, but in any sort of road driving, it would need pretty exeptional circumstances to make it quicker than a standard 120bhp base model Elise, let alone a 111S - you simply wouldn't be able to keep it 'on the boil' for enough of the time.

If Lotus produce an Elise/Exige that can match the TVR's acceleration, then the TIV would have no ace left to play and would be left floundering under all circumstances.

TVR's have many other advantages over Lotus: looks, noise, interior comfort, exclusivity, practicality, etc, etc, but I honestly don't think they can compete as a point-to-point tool.



Most of this is absolutely true for the older generation of TVRs - the point and squirt, straight line machines with too much low down torque for safety on wet corners. However, TVR have moved on dynamically since the Griffith, and I would suggest you get a ride in a T350 or Tamora - they don't have the ultimate handling expertise of an Elise, but with 90% of it, a tractable engine matched to a comfortable, carpeted interior, they more than match the Elise as a complete sports car.

In the end, the Elise is first and foremost a track day car, not a sports car designed for (almost) everyday use.

In real world UK driving, not track days, a modern day TVR will always win.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
Martin_S said:


Lets be honest, at least part of it is about image and bragging rights, and the Vauxhall badge just doesn't work, even if it is fixed to the front of a turbo'd Lotus.


I'll be pleased with my crap Vauxhall badge then and go quicker in a straight line than any stock RV8 TVR and a shedload quicker in the twisties...

Let me see now a great chassis with 118bhp or 250bhp