Why spend so much more on not a tvr?!
Why spend so much more on not a tvr?!
Author
Discussion

Danattheopticians

Original Poster:

375 posts

131 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
Look at this:
It's blue, has 2 seats and a V8 engine.Does 0 - 60 in 4 seconds and 155 mph! http://www.msn.com/en-gb/cars/ownership/revealed-2...
And then look at this: It's blue, has a V8 engine, does 0-60 in 4.1 seconds and is faster at 167 mph! http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/t...
I do admire expensive cars but compare these and wonder why?

FlipFlopGriff

7,144 posts

276 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
Ones built by Germans and perceived to be well built. The other by a couple of northern blokes and put together by hand and perceived as unreliable.
I doubt a Chimp would do 167 BTW and the Merc will be limited.
FFG

Danattheopticians

Original Poster:

375 posts

131 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
True, but is the merc 11 times better? I'm more on about look how good a car,one perceived in 1995 is,ok this is a 1998 example but is only 14k compared to a brand new car that offers only really a little more for 17th! In make you really appreciate what those northern blokes actually created 20+ years ago and a good one is still going strong and still delivers the performance today!

caduceus

6,126 posts

295 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
Danattheopticians said:
Look at this:
And then look at this: It's blue, has a V8 engine, does 0-60 in 4.1 seconds and is faster at 167 mph! http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/t...
What's going on with the price tag at Fernhursts? Surely this car should be nearer 20k confused

blueg33

46,401 posts

253 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
The Merc will keep you warm and dry in the winter, it will be more reliable, it's new, it will have comfort features the Tvr can only dream of etc

FlipFlopGriff

7,144 posts

276 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
The Merc will keep you warm and dry in the winter, it will be more reliable, it's new, it will have comfort features the Tvr can only dream of etc
And more to go wrong, and more expensive in the long run. God knows what depreciation will be like - A Chimp per year at least.
FFG

blueg33

46,401 posts

253 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
FlipFlopGriff said:
blueg33 said:
The Merc will keep you warm and dry in the winter, it will be more reliable, it's new, it will have comfort features the Tvr can only dream of etc
And more to go wrong, and more expensive in the long run. God knows what depreciation will be like - A Chimp per year at least.
FFG
Yup. But you won't have to worry or carry a tool kit if you want to drive to Nice and back over s few days.



Danattheopticians

Original Poster:

375 posts

131 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
FlipFlopGriff said:
blueg33 said:
The Merc will keep you warm and dry in the winter, it will be more reliable, it's new, it will have comfort features the Tvr can only dream of etc
And more to go wrong, and more expensive in the long run. God knows what depreciation will be like - A Chimp per year at least.
FFG
Yup. But you won't have to worry or carry a tool kit if you want to drive to Nice and back over s few days.
The tvr would get you there and back perfectly fine. It's not driving them that they don't like. Keep it going and it'll get you there and back no problems!

QBee

22,464 posts

173 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
A TVR is the best bang for the buck. If I had 15 times as much spare cash I might buy a McLaren, but nothing touches a TVR at the sub £20k budget.

SMB

1,523 posts

295 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
caduceus said:
What's going on with the price tag at Fernhursts? Surely this car should be nearer 20k confused
Unprepared car, no warranty and will come with a list of work required no doubt.

blueg33

46,401 posts

253 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
Danattheopticians said:
blueg33 said:
FlipFlopGriff said:
blueg33 said:
The Merc will keep you warm and dry in the winter, it will be more reliable, it's new, it will have comfort features the Tvr can only dream of etc
And more to go wrong, and more expensive in the long run. God knows what depreciation will be like - A Chimp per year at least.
FFG
Yup. But you won't have to worry or carry a tool kit if you want to drive to Nice and back over s few days.
The tvr would get you there and back perfectly fine. It's not driving them that they don't like. Keep it going and it'll get you there and back no problems!
Not with as much certainty.

PuffsBack

2,442 posts

254 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
So just to add some balance to the nonsense posted on here from time to time

12 years of TVR's - (all the history is on these forums, you can check back) - here is a list of major problems I have encounted

Chimaera - Seat belt retraction pulley spring failed (replaced for £15)
Griffith - Nothing
Cerbera - Battery, Alternator (both replaced myself)
Sagaris - Nothing

along with my

2.5 year old BMW 3 Series that I owned for 6 months - Air Con fan failed, sensor in exhaust failed (meaning it failed first MoT), Headlight washers failed.

N7GTX

8,302 posts

172 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
Danattheopticians said:
Look at this:
It's blue, has 2 seats and a V8V12 engine.Does 0 - 60 in 4 seconds and electronically limited to 155 mph!
EFA readsmile

m4tti

5,488 posts

184 months

Saturday 4th June 2016
quotequote all
Unfortunately the tvr has semi "press" performance figures which will require the press car and a test pilot. The sl65 will hit its figures all day long, and they will likely be conservative. Over 100 it'll urinate on most tvr's.

The majority of those Mercedes will be bought an run and run with no issues. There will always be an outlier case but however complicated you might think it is hardware and programming and durability has come on so far it's really no longer an issue.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

137 months

Saturday 4th June 2016
quotequote all
N7GTX said:
Danattheopticians said:
Look at this:
It's blue, has 2 seats and a V8V12 engine.Does 0 - 60 in 4 seconds and electronically limited to 155 mph!
EFA readsmile
Ha ha caught out

PuffsBack

2,442 posts

254 months

Saturday 4th June 2016
quotequote all
m4tti said:
Unfortunately the tvr has semi "press" performance figures which will require the press car and a test pilot. The sl65 will hit its figures all day long, and they will likely be conservative. Over 100 it'll urinate on most tvr's.

The majority of those Mercedes will be bought an run and run with no issues. There will always be an outlier case but however complicated you might think it is hardware and programming and durability has come on so far it's really no longer an issue.
To be fair my AMG Merc was a model of reliabilty - rust proofing was another story!! Its just seems to be BMW products that cause me issues as my Mini Cooper S Convertible hood broke!

Danattheopticians

Original Poster:

375 posts

131 months

Saturday 4th June 2016
quotequote all
DoubleD said:
N7GTX said:
Danattheopticians said:
Look at this:
It's blue, has 2 seats and a V8V12 engine.Does 0 - 60 in 4 seconds and electronically limited to 155 mph!
EFA readsmile
Ha ha caught out
It is blue tho, I got that part right!
laugh

Danattheopticians

Original Poster:

375 posts

131 months

Saturday 4th June 2016
quotequote all
Hey guys, this isn't a dig at the merc, just a bit of fun comparison of 14k tvr and 173k brand new merc! You are buying in both examples 2 seats sports cars with similar acceleration at least up to ns speeds and a little over, so both will offer just as much fun plus I think that the tvr would turn more heads. The sl65 is and amazing sl but to the average Joe on the street it's just another convertible merc. My 173k would go on a vanquish but that's just personal preference.

N7GTX

8,302 posts

172 months

Saturday 4th June 2016
quotequote all
As you say the TVR would turn more heads in the general public but the '65' version has been around for a long time in the Merc, notably the CL65 since 2003. That car weighs 2155kgs and has claimed figures of 0-60 in 4.4 seconds, 60-100 in 4.5 and 0-100 in 8.9 secs. The quarter mile is 12.5 secs with a 5 speed automatic.
This old bus would give your TVR a run for its money! eek

But there isn't the drama, noise and sense of occasion the old school Brit provides yum

DoubleD

22,154 posts

137 months

Saturday 4th June 2016
quotequote all
You should post this in general gassing for slightly less bias opinions