996
Author
Discussion

mw1

Original Poster:

46 posts

254 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
Interested in Buying a 996. Any advice on what I should watch out for. Also what are running costs like as I have never owned a porsche before and dont know what to budget for? Any ideas what I would get for approx £35k ?

leosayer

7,696 posts

268 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
Do a search for 'RMS'

Azura_tzo

671 posts

287 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
I have one for sale in the Classifieds section of Piston heads around your price range! ;-)

Re the RMS issue, as I understand, while this issue existis, it is exagerated on web boards. I for one have never had an issue.

Am I right in thinking it is more of an issue for manual cars?

oldtimer

300 posts

280 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
Yeah, azuro is right , most cars (ie over 90%) dont have a problem with RMS , the few that do get plenty of air-time both from unfortunate 996 owners and people who don't own 996s and don't like 'em either. The word from the workshops is that tiptronics are unlikely to have RMS problems. Its all reflected in the secondhand price , hence some 996s look cheaper than 993s. Hey , nothing is perfect !
Go for it, you get a good 35k's worth of fast car thats a lot classier than a merc/beemer/audi/jag etc and the handling is fantastic!

superlightr

12,920 posts

287 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
mine had 2 rms problems from new in 20k. I owned 1 porker so its a high % for me.

Got a tt now. I think the RMS is a more common problem then discussed tbh. A poll on here would be good.

big.bad.wolfie

910 posts

264 months

Thursday 3rd March 2005
quotequote all
My C4S has an RMS issue, however it is covered by the new Porsche Warranty. Whether or not the RMS will manifest itself again I don't know, but if coincides with the need for a new clutch each time I won't be too worried - saves the labour charge!

kamal996

4,262 posts

268 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
Yes I have owned a 996 and no, I would not buy another- There is a more serious issue with the engine than the RMS-They appear to have a problem with cylinder bores (get in touch with ninemeister on this board-he is far more knowlegeable). I am not sure if it affects the later 3.6s. It results in a new engine and these seem to be supplied by Porsche on cars with Full Porshce History but I am now hearing of cases where they are saying No-Leaving owners with a £10k bill!

I didnt not suffer the problem but my car was low mileage. Talk to Tower Porshce also-they had 4 996s awaiting new engines last time I visited. They just told me to steer well clear of 996s.

bumcrack

977 posts

289 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
Yes kamal, the 996 engine is clearly a dud; I'm surprised I can get my 996 off the drive without it exploding.

fulham911club

2,046 posts

266 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
I think the whole engine problem is grossly over exaggerated as a result of web chat. Yes it is unfortunate if your engine goes pop and yes there are a number of people here and elsewhere who belly-ache the problems BUT I think you'll find that the members of this board really are the minority and that there are a vast majority of people v happy with their cars and don't go anywhere near a web chat.

Buy the car and ignore the scare mongers!!

Azura_tzo

671 posts

287 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
kamal996 said:
Yes I have owned a 996 and no, I would not buy another- There is a more serious issue with the engine than the RMS-They appear to have a problem with cylinder bores (get in touch with ninemeister on this board-he is far more knowlegeable). I am not sure if it affects the later 3.6s. It results in a new engine and these seem to be supplied by Porsche on cars with Full Porshce History but I am now hearing of cases where they are saying No-Leaving owners with a £10k bill!



Oh dear, are you for real?

While its is entirely your right to do so, could I ask why you seem to trawl through this board and go on and on about the clearly isolated issues with your car long after it has gone?

>> Edited by Azura_tzo on Friday 4th March 22:39

toppstuff

13,698 posts

271 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
I had a 996 that had its engine replaced free by Porsche. I was not fussed, as it did'nt cost me a bean or cause me any hassle at all.

And in Kamals defence, I have been to Tower Porsche who also have a number of 996 in for a rebuild.

I believe that that 3.6's are much less prone. And tiptronics seem Ok too.

Having said that , I also believe that there are plenty of high mileage early 996 which have not had a problem.

kamal996

4,262 posts

268 months

Monday 7th March 2005
quotequote all
Azura_tzo said:


Oh dear, are you for real?

While its is entirely your right to do so, could I ask why you seem to trawl through this board and go on and on about the clearly isolated issues with your car long after it has gone?

>> Edited by Azura_tzo on Friday 4th March 22:39


FYI- My car did not have a catastrophic engine failure whilst in my ownership.

I am sorry for trying to provide assistance to another Pistonhead member....but somehow I thought that was the purpose of the board. Does this now mean that if I no longer own the 996 I am no longer able to distribute knowledge!

If and when your engines do go "pop" then at least you will be armed to battle with Porsche in the Highcourt-because you will have facts and other instances of engine failure-pre the internet- it was very difficult for consumers to amass such knowlege but now manufacturers like Porsche, Mercedes, BMW who have compromised so much on quality and continue to raise prices can be challenged.

Look in Portiacraft-yet another 996 with a new engine by Porsche! Talk to some specialists to get an idea of the problem..It may only affect X per cent of Porsches but how can anyone suggest that this is an acceptable risk for a brand that prides itself on quality?

kamal996

4,262 posts

268 months

Monday 7th March 2005
quotequote all
bumcrack said:
Yes kamal, the 996 engine is clearly a dud; I'm surprised I can get my 996 off the drive without it exploding.


I, too would be worried about venturing around northern towns in a pink Porsche

rubystone

11,254 posts

283 months

Monday 7th March 2005
quotequote all
Azura, anyone would think you had a vested interest in defending the RMS problems on the 996...

Azura_tzo

671 posts

287 months

Monday 7th March 2005
quotequote all
rubystone said:
Azura, anyone would think you had a vested interest in defending the RMS problems on the 996...


Yeah right. I'm as unbiased as one of these:

But seriously, I'm not defending it, I'm saying it is a problem, but not to the catestrophic levels sometimes suggested on here.

>> Edited by Azura_tzo on Monday 7th March 20:19

big.bad.wolfie

910 posts

264 months

Monday 7th March 2005
quotequote all
So just how many cars over recent years have developed oil leaks? Quite a few I would have thought! An RMS does not lead to catastrophic engine failure, running a car without oil will, just watch your levels.

Damian

superlightr

12,920 posts

287 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
so how about a poll?

Who has Had a RMS failure in their 996?

Azura_tzo

671 posts

287 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Good idea.

Not me. (MY00, Tip, 65k mls)

will_t

821 posts

266 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Azura_tzo said:
Good idea.

Not me. (MY00, Tip, 65k mls)


Not me (996 coupe MY 00, Tiptronic 33k miles}

Will

STEVEJT

77 posts

295 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Funnily enough, I just received a questionairre from PCGB regarding the RMS issue which they intend to publish shortly. Surely the results of this survey will have an influence on how Porsche handles this issue. I suggest all 996 owners who are members of PCGB ask for a copy of the questionairre if they have not yet been contacted.