GTR v 991 GT3 RS half mile drag race - Evo
Discussion
9e 28 said:
Yep - that surprised me . I love the RS 0-60 time . Hard to comment as don't want to spoil it 
isaldiri said:
9e 28 said:
Incredibly a GT3 RS can keep a 675 LT honest around a track which is 550bhp/tonne
How do you get your numbers...? A 675 is erm 675 PS and will weigh around 1380kg.Which track as well has the RS 'kept a 675 honest'....?
http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/10h9oec61ozm
9e 28 said:
That's what you get from taking 'fastestlaps' at face value..... The weight for the 675 they are using is dry weight while the RS is 90% fuelled. Real world and fully fuelled, the RS probably weighs 1475kg or thereabouts, the 675 will weigh about 1390kg. Bit of variation due to spec obviously.isaldiri said:
9e 28 said:
That's what you get from taking 'fastestlaps' at face value..... The weight for the 675 they are using is dry weight while the RS is 90% fuelled. Real world and fully fuelled, the RS probably weighs 1475kg or thereabouts, the 675 will weigh about 1390kg. Bit of variation due to spec obviously.9e 28 said:
I also do not think one can dispute that the 991 GT3 RS is putting out a fair bit more than 500PS. Probably more like 550-570PS judging by the video. .
not plausible imo for the 991rs to be putting out anything like 550 PS.I'd suggest the difference between the cars in the video is tyre related rather than hp to be honest as the GTR likely wasn't using the nismo spec NR1 tyre (couldn't read off the tyre sidewall from the video) and the standard gtr tyre isn't the equivalent spec sport maxx race tyre that is the other Porsche option comparable to the Cup2, especially given the 0-60 times which is mainly tyre limited these days.
isaldiri said:
9e 28 said:
I also do not think one can dispute that the 991 GT3 RS is putting out a fair bit more than 500PS. Probably more like 550-570PS judging by the video. .
not plausible imo for the 991rs to be putting out anything like 550 PS.I'd suggest the difference between the cars in the video is tyre related rather than hp to be honest as the GTR likely wasn't using the nismo spec NR1 tyre (couldn't read off the tyre sidewall from the video) and the standard gtr tyre isn't the equivalent spec sport maxx race tyre that is the other Porsche option comparable to the Cup2, especially given the 0-60 times which is mainly tyre limited these days.
http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/lllu2novaplh
9e 28 said:
Still does not explain the GT3 RS extraordinary lap times against 675 LT. Here's lap times comparison against 7 GT2 RS where its giving away 120bhp and 50kg weight penalty. Maybe chassis and PDK so good that they can make up a 50kg weight penalty and 120bhp power deficit who knows? To me logic says GT3 RS must have more power than quoted. If you'd told me a GT3 RS could nudge a GTR over half mile I'd have said no way on any tyres!
http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/lllu2novaplh
The 7gt2RS is on an older tyre, the current cup2 is imo a good bit faster than the cup+ on the 7rs cars.http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/lllu2novaplh
I still don't think the times are that close between the 675 and RS. 1.3 seconds on hockenheim short for sport auto is a huge difference given it's a 70 second ish lap. You can't be expecting 2+ second differences for that? Last i heard a 675 absolutely spanked a bunch of 991RS at Spa in April with quite a few Phers in attendance for example..
the RS is a great car and a lot faster than one would expect a 500hp near 1500kg car but comparing performance to the 675 is a bit nuts and not really sensible imo given the spec and price differences.isaldiri said:
9e 28 said:
Still does not explain the GT3 RS extraordinary lap times against 675 LT. Here's lap times comparison against 7 GT2 RS where its giving away 120bhp and 50kg weight penalty. Maybe chassis and PDK so good that they can make up a 50kg weight penalty and 120bhp power deficit who knows? To me logic says GT3 RS must have more power than quoted. If you'd told me a GT3 RS could nudge a GTR over half mile I'd have said no way on any tyres!
http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/lllu2novaplh
The 7gt2RS is on an older tyre, the current cup2 is imo a good bit faster than the cup+ on the 7rs cars.http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/lllu2novaplh
I still don't think the times are that close between the 675 and RS. 1.3 seconds on hockenheim short for sport auto is a huge difference given it's a 70 second ish lap. You can't be expecting 2+ second differences for that? Last i heard a 675 absolutely spanked a bunch of 991RS at Spa in April with quite a few Phers in attendance for example..
the RS is a great car and a lot faster than one would expect a 500hp near 1500kg car but comparing performance to the 675 is a bit nuts and not really sensible imo given the spec and price differences.
If anything in dry Cup + is quicker than Cup 2. Cup 2 better in wet and lasts longer but gives away a bit of pace and pretty sure it was developed specifically for GT2 RS.
There has been many a Spa/Silverstone trip recently showing the 675 to be a lot quicker than the RS - but that not really a surprise given the design briefs and price points.
Fastestlaps.com is not an authoritative source imv. Some of the laps are posted by amateurs, plus no data on conditions, tyres, etc.
The RS has a very good launch control process...plus it is interesting how the 4wd vs rear engine layout is working for a standing launch. You can see in the slow motion vid the Nissan is exhibiting a lot more rear wheel slip (less weight at the back with a rear biased 4wd system??) whilst the RS has a much more efficient take off.
Fastestlaps.com is not an authoritative source imv. Some of the laps are posted by amateurs, plus no data on conditions, tyres, etc.
The RS has a very good launch control process...plus it is interesting how the 4wd vs rear engine layout is working for a standing launch. You can see in the slow motion vid the Nissan is exhibiting a lot more rear wheel slip (less weight at the back with a rear biased 4wd system??) whilst the RS has a much more efficient take off.
A certain Mr. Chris Harris did a nice vid showing that a 650s was faster than a GT3 RS round a track, and the Macca wasn't even on sticky tyres. The 675LT would demolish the RS, as he states is the vid, and you can alway see why. The Macca is lighter, more powerful, and has more aero. But who am I to judge? I am just a keyboard warrior!!

cypriot said:
... The Macca is lighter, more powerful, and has more aero. But who am I to judge?
Such a simple concept - so difficult for many to understand - anyone mention the 620R yet?All RS cars punch above their "weight " in VFM stakes
GTRs amazing value
675LT etc - higher league, different generation.
9e 28 said:
I also do not think one can dispute that the 991 GT3 RS is putting out a fair bit more than 500PS. Probably more like 550-570PS judging by the video. Fabulous engineering to get that sort of power out of a n/a flat 6 and for that car to then be able to stay in touch with a carbon tubbed twin turbo lightweight Macca.
Im, I think you have to take into account the relative driveline losses and the obvious 288kg weight differences.The GTR from what I can find out has much higher 4WD driveline losses and puts about 425hp to the asphalt and the RS will be probably just over 400hp, that massive weight difference, the amazing rear engine launch and the mega advanced LC and PDK together with the NA motor not having to maintain boost during gearchanges makes for the RSs dominance - 911s are pretty special

Gassing Station | 911/Carrera GT | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




