Prescott: More Land to Gypsies
Prescott: More Land to Gypsies
Author
Discussion

james_j

Original Poster:

3,996 posts

284 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
The headline of today's Daily Express: "Give More Land to Gypsies Orders Prescott.

I haven't read the paper, does anyone know the detail?

This sounds like more typical Labour help to those who shouldn't be helped while penalising to the hilt those who are essentially law-abiding, look after themselves and contribute greatly to the country with their industry and tax paying.

An earlier Express article on Gypsies:

Labour's gypsy camp plans attacked

The Tories have attacked the Government over plans to instruct councils to provide more gypsy sites.

Shadow local government minister Eric Pickles accused Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott of "riding roughshod" over local planning laws.

The Government insisted councils now had the power to issue "temporary stop" orders to prevent the development of unauthorised sites - and were being asked to offer more official camps in return.

Mr Pickles said: "The Government is riding roughshod over planning laws, setting targets for more traveller sites and ignoring the views of local communities.

"Under Labour, our planning system is in crisis. John Prescott's response to travellers side-stepping planning laws is to let his regional quangos impose more traveller camps on every town.

"Local councils will be forced to follow arbitrary diktats for new traveller camps - imposed by unwanted and unelected regional bureaucrats.

"Only Conservatives offer an action plan to enforce planning laws, stop unauthorised developments, evict illegal occupiers, and safeguard local accountability and residents' local say."

But Housing Minister Yvette Cooper said: "There are two major problems in the planning system concerning gypsy and traveller sites.

"First, local authorities are not identifying enough appropriate locations either for private or public sites.

"And secondly, they have not had enough powers to respond swiftly to development on inappropriate sites. The result is that developments on problem sites are causing tensions and difficulties for both the neighbouring communities and the gypsy and traveller community."

hedders

24,460 posts

276 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
I don't see a problem.

There are lots of small uninhabited islands dotted around GB, lets turn them into self contained Pikey sites, that way they won't have to suffer the abuse that the rest of society hurls at them for no reason.


sparkythecat

8,097 posts

284 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
I don't know what mileage there is in this for the government. Gypsies aren't usually on the electoral role, so it's not as if there are votes to be had.

apache

39,731 posts

313 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
'Give'them land, so they don't have to pay for it like most people?

v8thunder

27,647 posts

287 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
I don't see what the problem is - if they are genuine gypsies they shouldn't have to resort to living on whatever patches of wasteland they can scrape - often in awful locations - just to live their way of life.

The problem is the 'fake' gypsies, ie the pikies, who pitch up one day, burn stuff, nick things, vandalise property and disappear off before anyone can do anything about it.

The good thing about this new move is that the pikies will be rooted out more easily, so they can leave everyone else - gypsy or homeowner - in peace.

sparkythecat

8,097 posts

284 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
If they want to settle on permanent sites, then surely they're giving up being travellers and could buy a house.

If they want to continue with their traditional nomadic lifestyle, and move from place to place then there are loads of places for them to camp.

Like
these

rich1231

17,340 posts

289 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
A group have just left from a location near me.



One family of them and the mess they have left is incredible. Thet have been in the location before and were moved on six months ago. Been there for two months this time. And there is a mountain of crap that us Council tax payers have to fork out for cleaning up.

JagLover

46,734 posts

264 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
I don't see any problem with Councils being encouraged to provide temporary sites for gypsies-perhaps in out of the way places.

Once there is sufficient then there is even less excuse for Trepassing & squatting

Then, linked in with this-anyone Trespassing or squating will be moved on immediatedly-no delays.

Also Gypsies should have to abide by the same rules as anyone else as regards planning consent for permanent developments.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
So does this mean all I need to buy is a caravan and the Government will stump up for the acre of land I have been looking for to build a house on in the Costwolds?

Any idea how I can get them to sponsor two triple brick built garages as well?

GregE240

10,857 posts

296 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
So does this mean all I need to buy is a caravan and the Government will stump up for the acre of land I have been looking for to build a house on in the Costwolds?

Any idea how I can get them to sponsor two triple brick built garages as well?
Your second question is the tricky part, I feel.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


That post..... Priceless...

You owe me some sandwich filling BR

pug406

3,636 posts

282 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
And in the Peterborough ET

www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=845&ArticleID=965162

Just what Blairout needs

>> Edited by pug406 on Tuesday 8th March 13:03

bruciebabe

1,126 posts

270 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
How about Pendine sands at low tide?

soir

2,277 posts

268 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all


I'd like a holiday home in the lake district - therefore I'll dump a caravan there/or build a small home, erect a large parimiter fence (about an acre or more around) rig up (Steal) local electric & water and declare it my own.

Sounds a good idea to me?!

Then I'll quit work, stop paying tax, and just build caravan homes selling them on to gypsies for a small profit (keeping all the money of course)..

simpo two

92,661 posts

294 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
bruciebabe said:
How about Pendine sands at low tide?

Morecambe beach has a proven track record...

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
BliarOut said:

anonymous said:
[redacted]


bravo


That post..... Priceless...

You owe me some sandwich filling BR

nighthawk

1,757 posts

273 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Chester city council were planning to place one of these sites in a most oppertune location.

2mins walk from a retail park
5mins walk from a large estate with a bit of history for being troublesome.




i can almost smell the burning cars now !!!

I really have no idea where these do gooding loonies come from, stick the feckin pikey scum down prescot's own street and see how he likes his patio furniture ending up outside some scumbags caravan.

I wonder if they'd allow the travelling folk to pitch up rent free on top of the water and electric supplies they'll be given.

tony.t

927 posts

285 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Labour has a natural affinity for pikeys since they are both fraudulent, lying, theiving, parasitical self -serving scum.

JagLover

46,734 posts

264 months

Wednesday 9th March 2005
quotequote all
tony.t said:
Labour has a natural affinity for pikeys since they are both fraudulent, lying, theiving, parasitical self -serving scum.