RE: TVR Drive Day at Loch Lomond
RE: TVR Drive Day at Loch Lomond
Wednesday 9th March 2005

TVR Drive Day at Loch Lomond

William Ball drove TVR Tuscans new and old, back to back -- and was surprised by what he found.


If you'd received a Christmas card from TVR with a letter from TVR exec Ben Samuelson trailing the chance to see the Sagaris and drive the Tuscan II, and to compare it to current build cars, a T350C and  Tuscan S -- at the Cameron House Hotel, on Loch Lomond, would you hesitate? Neither did I.

Sagaris

As I pulled up outside the hotel, two Sagarises were parked impressively in front of the main steps. With the backdrop of the hotel, the scenery, and not to mention the kilted doorman, the two cars looked superb.

The red car was an unregistered demonstrator, looking exactly as the production car will do. A red and yellow Sagaris squatting next to it was a road-registered RT and presented as ‘the race car’, though I’m not sure if it is the final version.

The two cars were there just on show, and we knew in advance drives would not be possible. Still, a great effort on behalf of TVR to get the 2 models there for us to paw over.

Let’s start with what appears to be the hottest topic then – the vents. Yes, on the production road car they are filled in. This means the vents on both the front and rear wings and also the one on the roof. I spoke to Geoff Laird-Portch of TVR about the vents.

His explanation made the ‘filling in’ make a lot more sense, to me at least. The issue of stones hitting the windscreen through the vents has been made public before, but it’s also worth considering the repercussions of cutting holes in glassfibre and possible crazing/cracking. With the cars now being warrantied for three years, TVR has to be sure that there is nothing in the design that can generate cause warranty claims. Viewed in that light, it’s laudable that TVR is now putting longevity over design.

That’s not to say that cut-out vents wouldn’t have looked much better, and indeed they are cut-out on the RT -- logical given that it will be sold as a race car.

What about the drives though?

Tuscan S

It had been a year or so since I had driven a TVR road car, and I never owned a Tuscan. Nevertheless, I have had a few test drives and loans in the past so it all came flooding back as soon as I got in the seat; the brass instruments, the nice alloy touches, the good-looking supportive-looking seats -- that actually don’t offer anywhere near enough support.

Press the heavy clutch and off we go. The weather had started to close in -- this was Scotland after all --  and the roads were now a bit slippery. Still, in a borrowed car, there was an opportunity for some hoonery.

We were accompanied by TVR or ‘dealer’ personnel in the passenger seat, but were allowed to drive as we wished – within reason though. So, tail out at the junction; up to the change-up lights though the gears and we snake up the road with an increasingly nervous looking passenger, whom I was later to learn had put the same car into a field the previous week.

It all came back – the grunty but revvy engine, precise box, the nervous steering: wonderful. This was a real TVR, and I could feel new chest-hairs sprouting by the second. I don’t recall the wind nose off the targa top being quite so severe the last time I was in a Tuscan though.

If the day ended then I’d have gone home happy. A car that met my expectations in full -- I’d have one in my garage. But in truth, I’d rather have a Cerbera again.

Tuscan II

Next up was the Tuscan II. I’d seen these in the flesh at the local dealer, and had already concluded that they looked rather better put together. Not much I could put a finger on, but just a feeling of better quality. Certainly, there were none of the familiar glue overruns on the trim.

The seats looked broadly the same as the Tuscan 1 (and later Cerberas), but are far more comfortable, and actually hold you in. I was unsure about the new instrumentation though. It’s certainly no worse than the original, but not a match on the Cerbera, which I consider was the high water mark of TVR interior design. While the Tuscan I seemed to have instrumentation from the Captain Nemo school of design, the II seems to have borrowed from Star Trek (the original) with that strange viewing tube Mr Spock looked down to diagnose all manner of issues with the Enterprise. Based on the Tuscan II, we can now conclude he was looking at speed, RPM, fuel and temperature.

I did like the press-button starter though, the buttons on the steering wheel, and the ‘electronic’ indicator stalk – all throwbacks to the Cerbera. Except in this case, the controls just ooze quality. If the Cerbera switches always felt the next touch would be their last, the new Tuscan switches feel like a quality hi-fi.

On to the driving though. The clutch is lighter for a start, but still lots of feel. The steering feels better too, but hey we’re still in the car park. What about the open road?

A quick repeat of the junction hoonery of the Tuscan I, and it's considerably more controllable. It lets you not just dabble with a wee tail-out, you can hang there in limbo for a while, and no snaking up the road. Even with the roads getting slippier, this car gets its power down.

The ride was a revelation. Absolutely stunning, it felt softer but not floaty, as if there were a hidden hover device under the car which, once engaged, lets the car ride an inch above the road surface, yet still allows traction and cornering of the first order.

And the relationship between the controls; the feel, the travel, the weighting, the feedback – all matched perfectly, and each spot-on. The clutch was just right. The brakes felt superb. The throttle travel? Connected direct to the brain.

The steering was as sharp as the Tuscan 1, but relaxed and quiet, sharp and smooth; an automotive oxymoron but that's how it felt. Here was a car that you could put the stereo on and do 1,000 miles in a day. Here was the best TVR I’d ever driven.

As for the handling, I was reminded of the legendary Norton Featherbed 'bike frame. Norton came up with the best handling frame of its day and won the TT with it, but it was also supremely comfortable, bucking the trend of stiffening the chassis to improve handling. TVR has achieved the same with the Tuscan II. The ride is much softer, yet handles much better.

A change of plan for the dream garage then. Out goes the Cerb and the ‘original’ Tuscan; in comes a Tuscan II. That’s all I’d need.

T350

I was in a high enough state of euphoria after the Tuscan 2 drive that I would happily have called it a day at that point…but then I had the chance to drive a T350t. I had driven the Tamora/T350 before, but they were relatively early cars, so I was glad of the opportunity to drive a current build car.

Off we go then, and by now the roads are getting really greasy. But not greasy enough to stop a bit of tail-out tomfoolery. This was the first time I’d driven a Speed 6 engined car with a sports exhaust. My long-lost Cerb was de-catted and ran straight-through pipes, and I never thought anything could pop and bang with such style, but this T350 matched it.

And now the dilemma kicks in. Compared to the awesome Tuscan II, there is no way the T350 is anywhere near as sorted. The controls aren't as cohesive, it doesn’t ride as well, it’s nowhere near as relaxing but it's actually more fun. Much as though the Tuscan II is a superbly accomplished car -- the most sorted yet -- the T350 was a bigger hoot.

That doesn’t make it a better, or a more preferable car. What it does mean though is that TVR has come up with two very different cars using almost identical chassis and engines. To me, the Tuscan II seems an accomplished GT with continent-eating capabilities, day-to-day practicality, yet sprightly enough to perform well on a track day. The T350 seems sharper, more raw, more edgy, and a better track day tool as a result. As a consequence, it's not quite so mature feeling, and that’s no bad thing either.

GT or hooligan – the choice is yours.

S6 thrashes Rover V8

And the rest of the day? As well as the cars, TVR had rustled up a neat selection of merchandise for sale, and it was good to meet some of the well known faces from the factory- John Reid, Mike Williams and Danielle (and others who I didn’t know the names of!). Brian and Claire from Dreadnought were there too providing backup and assistance, as well as folks from Glenvarigill. All in all an impressive effort from the factory, and all the more impressive to bring such a ‘roadshow’ to Scotland – which is never going to be a particularly large market and is usually overlooked as a result. Many thanks therefore to TVR, and especially Geoff, who I understand pulled it all together.

So, apart from giving Scottish TVR enthusiasts a jolly, was it actually worth it for the factory? Only time will tell I guess, but I do know a number of dyed-in-the-wool Rover-engined enthusiasts were seriously taken with the new S6 cars. And the three-year warranty was changing a few opinions too.

The latest cars really have moved on so much that if you haven’t driven one lately you really don’t know what you are missing. It all probably sounds like an advert for TVR, but I really was blown away by the Tuscan II, and was mightily impressed by the T350.

Thanks to William Ball (aka tvrolet) for most of the pictures

Author
Discussion

Rambofanso

Original Poster:

80 posts

278 months

Wednesday 9th March 2005
quotequote all
I can honestly say that having owned two nice TVR's, I am hooked! No other car gives me so much enjoyment & I have cerainly tried a few. You always feel special in a TVR & seem to gain respect, not like looking a pratt in a foreign supercar costing at least three times as much!
WELL DONE TVR, it can only get even better now especially with the new 3 year warantees on offer.

John Nowak

108 posts

273 months

Wednesday 9th March 2005
quotequote all
The Tuscan II is godlike. The Sagaris became more and more hideous each revision. The closed vents are downright silly.

griff2be

5,105 posts

296 months

Wednesday 9th March 2005
quotequote all
John Nowak said:
The Sagaris became more and more hideous each revision. The closed vents are downright silly.


They might be silly on the road car, but if it is ever developed into a GT race car then vents can be opened up and may be a huge advantage at, for example, Le Mans. The basic shape of the vents needs to be there on the road car to enable them to be used on the race car under the homolgation rules, as far as I know.

richb

56,216 posts

313 months

Wednesday 9th March 2005
quotequote all
griff2be said:

The basic shape of the vents needs to be there on the road car to enable them to be used on the race car under the homolgation rules, as far as I know.
Andy that's the first sensible explanation for the (closed off) vents remainig that I've heard Rich...

gazzab

21,627 posts

311 months

Wednesday 9th March 2005
quotequote all
well done Mr Ball. And nice to see you in a Tuscan again !
Gary

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
Reviews like this are a serious worry. I'd "never" part with the Griff, but the more I read about the latest models, the more tempting they become. Luckily am saved by the large hole in my bank account

planetdave

9,922 posts

282 months

Friday 11th March 2005
quotequote all
Closed off vents?

I parked next to a Corsa with these the other day and tutted. It's just not right.

A way needs to be found or TVR will just be joining the laxxer party.

GasBlaster

27,580 posts

308 months

Friday 11th March 2005
quotequote all
Apart from anything else, the vents will be a bugger to polish, and will they collect rainwater?

pwig

12,003 posts

299 months

Saturday 12th March 2005
quotequote all
Someone mention a cerbera?

You know what would have been good, to make every comparison to the cebera... oh wait...

tvrgit

8,489 posts

281 months

Saturday 12th March 2005
quotequote all
Wille once owned a Cerbera, so it's hardly surprising that he chose that as his point of reference.

Some of us knew that, so no problem.

There's more than one regional "clique" on here ya know! (Wish there weren't any, but it's a fact of life)

V8Dan

12 posts

295 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
What the hell is that back end all about?

ugly ass thing.....

TVR styling is somwhat..... ermm Van Gough like these days..... very abstract....... too much vodka me thinx

it does'nt flow like the mid to late ninties designs like the chimera and cerb...

dinkel

27,770 posts

287 months

Thursday 17th March 2005
quotequote all
William Ball / trvolet: why did you put a 6.3 in ur T?

campbell

2,500 posts

312 months

Friday 18th March 2005
quotequote all
Hi all
Good Read
I was up there for the day with my Dad, i was wearing a black bommer jacket with TVR over it.

The weather heald off just for most of the day and the road was ok for the breef sprints you could get out of the road between the trafic and police , also getting to driive any car you liked when avalible .
The Saggies were very nice to see and hear running but i wouldnt give up the SEAC on the sound difference (no contest atall) sounds more like mad bike
The red and yellow Saggy belongs to the TVR boss and was on loan. one of the Tuscan IIs has a damaged bonet done by JeromyC a week before th event
If you were to have the vents open on the front and rear wings there would be no chance of stones coming through, there is iner wheel arch covers to stop this happening, there are fitted to the RT model, just look at my pics of the day to see.
www.compsoc.man.ac.uk/~jamesg/gallery/campbell?&page=4
I think if i were to got a Saggy i would have the vents open, no water collection points or some one misstaking it as an ashtray and itlooks hot with them open and what about summer driving, they can only help.
If any one wants a copy of any of the pics in full size please email me by my profile
Well it was a full and fun day, i wished i new other PH people were going, we could of had a chat and a coffee, ohh well another time.
Hope you enloy the pictures

Campbell

dinkel

27,770 posts

287 months

Friday 18th March 2005
quotequote all
campbell said:
Hi all
Good Read
I was up there for the day with my Dad, i was wearing a black bommer jacket with TVR over it.


Hope you enloy the pictures

Campbell


www.compsoc.man.ac.uk/~jamesg/gallery/maxpower2004

Some nice pics there.

Saggy is very photogenic.

tvrolet

4,746 posts

311 months

Friday 18th March 2005
quotequote all
dinkel said:
William Ball / trvolet: why did you put a 6.3 in ur T?


Because the race cars are sold 'sans engines'.

Kosher race AJP 4.5 (450BHP) would slot straight in, but obviously not a cheap option. Plus possibly fragile and issues with parts in the longer term.

Roadgoing AJP realistically only 350BHPish unless a very good one and/or loads of money thrown at it. Plus not cheap, not very 'available' and the same issues of fragility and parts supply in the long term. Plus a roadgoing AJP won't just drop straight in a Tuscan chassis; the race engines are slightly different shaped with a dry sump.

....or a Chevy, which are not exactly scarce. There have been more than 90 million, yes 90 million, small block chevy engine built! The list of tuning parts is endless...in fact the only thing that's 'real Chevrolet' in my engine is the block. And the parts are surprisingly cheap, so a reliable 500BHP+ is fairly easy (and economic) to achieve. I wanted to get the same power-to-weight of a race Tuscan, but mine will be heavier with the 'road legal' gear so I needed a few more ponies Oh, and the Chevy sounds nice too

Still some months away from getting it all put together though.

Oh, and if the question meant why 6.3 versus a 5.7, then the extra 600cc should make the car a little more driveable bottom-end with the top-end power I'm after.

WB

dinkel

27,770 posts

287 months

Friday 18th March 2005
quotequote all
WB I thank you kindly.

Is a Beemer lump that much pennies? A 4.4 would get 500 ponies with some racy add ons . . .