Nikon D2X Pix
Author
Discussion

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Monday 14th March 2005
quotequote all

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Monday 14th March 2005
quotequote all
The one above was taken at about 300-400 metres
Now cropped on the outboard engine

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Monday 14th March 2005
quotequote all
Something foxy in the back garden

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Monday 14th March 2005
quotequote all
This one was taken at about 100 yards



and cropped

Hugh1

3,692 posts

262 months

Monday 14th March 2005
quotequote all
Should have gone to spec' savers...

Would I be right in saying its an RS700? Lurvely boats.

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Monday 14th March 2005
quotequote all
well spotted sir

rico

7,917 posts

276 months

Monday 14th March 2005
quotequote all
Very impressive! Good old Nikon!

CVP

2,799 posts

296 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
Wow, great resolution.

I've seen some other D2X images from sources I believe to be genuine and so far it looks to be really great.

How's the user experience so far?? Have you tried the HSC crop mode of the fly yet? I would think it could be a real bonus to you in your sailing images.

Chris

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

264 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
I think we need to get you and ehasler together and do our own PH comparison

beano500

20,854 posts

296 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
I





really






musn't





start




looking




Mmmm!




D2X





....

CVP

2,799 posts

296 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
beano500 said:
I





really






musn't





start




looking




Mmmm!




D2X





....



I know it's tempting beyond belief. Both the D2X and the EOS 1D mark II are incredible photographic tools.

Annual bonus is in the bank account - I feel myself weakening but it is £3.5k - that's still keeping me held back. If it was my business then I'd be doing my utmost to get one right now, but it's just a hobby for me despite how seriously I take it. And that price tag is pretty eye watering. Give it a few more weeks until I've weakened enough!

Chris

>> Edited by CVP on Tuesday 15th March 11:35

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
dcw@pr said:
I think we need to get you and ehasler together and do our own PH comparison


Well I am up for it........

ehasler

8,574 posts

304 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
Scooby_snax said:

dcw@pr said:
I think we need to get you and ehasler together and do our own PH comparison



Well I am up for it........
Me too, although not sure what it will prove aside from being an interesting exercise

agent006

12,058 posts

285 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
Scooby_snax said:



Bloody hell, Lloyd Grossman in a boat. So where's the pic of you capsizing him on purpose then?

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
ehasler said:

Scooby_snax said:


dcw@pr said:
I think we need to get you and ehasler together and do our own PH comparison




Well I am up for it........

Me too, although not sure what it will prove aside from being an interesting exercise


Probably prove that for 90% of scenarios there is little difference.

ehasler

8,574 posts

304 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
Scooby_snax said:

ehasler said:


Scooby_snax said:



dcw@pr said:
I think we need to get you and ehasler together and do our own PH comparison





Well I am up for it........


Me too, although not sure what it will prove aside from being an interesting exercise



Probably prove that for 90% of scenarios there is little difference.
We should do a blind test - post some test images and see if anyone can tell which camera took what

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Tuesday 15th March 2005
quotequote all
ehasler said:


Scooby_snax said:



ehasler said:




Scooby_snax said:





dcw@pr said:
I think we need to get you and ehasler together and do our own PH comparison





Well I am up for it........




Me too, although not sure what it will prove aside from being an interesting exercise





Probably prove that for 90% of scenarios there is little difference.


We should do a blind test - post some test images and see if anyone can tell which camera took what


funnily enough i was thinking along the same lines

>> Edited by Scooby_snax on Tuesday 15th March 20:58

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

264 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
Go on then you two, let's sort it out. I suggest both using the same lens - Scooby Snax do you have a Nikkor 50mm f/1.4? If so, then a scene can be chosen where you can both take exactly the same photo (obviously Mr Hasler will have to stand a bit closer), and the results can be compared. Take the photos on a tripod at f/5.6 for optimal results, and do a selection of ISOs from 200-800 (and 1600 for the Canon). Might have to play with the in camera sharpening too.

I see you are both in London (as am I *cough cough*), so it shouldn't be too difficult to arrange...

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

264 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
WRT the blind test - if you want then I can take all the photos and deal with them so that you won't know which is which, then post them up for comparison

Scooby_snax

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

275 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
dcw@pr said:
WRT the blind test - if you want then I can take all the photos and deal with them so that you won't know which is which, then post them up for comparison


Is that like give me your car keys mister so i can take your car for a test run ;-)