What's the pinnacle of game graphics ?
What's the pinnacle of game graphics ?
Author
Discussion

J4CKO

Original Poster:

45,559 posts

221 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
As per the title, what's the best graphics out there currently ?


J4CKO

Original Poster:

45,559 posts

221 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
Yeah, not very clear but that looks amazing, how much do you need to spend to get to that level ?

mp3manager

4,254 posts

217 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
Not from a game but it must be what some developers are aiming at in a few years time.


Monty Python

4,813 posts

218 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
From what I've seen of it, Star Citizen looks pretty good.

Mr Snrub

25,763 posts

248 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
But the character models, especially the lip synching, look very last gen

vonuber

17,868 posts

186 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
Rise of the Tomb Raider still stands up, it pushed everything when it came out last year.

franki68

11,369 posts

242 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Will a 1060gtx ,or 1070gtx not manage playing 4K at good frame rates?

Wadeski

8,799 posts

234 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
Have graphics really improved much over Half Life 2, released 12 years ago?

PS4 games look like PS3 games in slightly higher res to me - we seem to be at a point of diminishing returns.

Then again I remember being in awe of OpenGL games running on early hardware accelerators vs software (in, say, MW2 or Quake), whereas today the difference is nothing to write home about.

Mr Snrub

25,763 posts

248 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
Have graphics really improved much over Half Life 2, released 12 years ago?

PS4 games look like PS3 games in slightly higher res to me - we seem to be at a point of diminishing returns.

Then again I remember being in awe of OpenGL games running on early hardware accelerators vs software (in, say, MW2 or Quake), whereas today the difference is nothing to write home about.
There is only so far we can go. The differences between consoles like the NES, SNES, Playstation 1 then Playstation 2 were absolutely massive, but after that it's more a gradual improvement that you may not see at first glance


bloomen

9,175 posts

180 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
Have graphics really improved much over Half Life 2, released 12 years ago?
PS4 games look like PS3 games in slightly higher res to me - we seem to be at a point of diminishing returns.
Yup. I regularly flip between the two and I can't say I notice much or any difference.

franki68

11,369 posts

242 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Your first post just saved me from a big mistake. Just got a 1060gtx and was about to splash out on a gsync 4K monitor.
Just checked and it won't run stuff in 4K ,qhd is the best you can run on the 1060s.





skeeterm5

4,421 posts

209 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
For me this is the wrong question.

The question should be which has the best gameplay with good graphics. I am convinced that the insatiable drive for better graphics (which most people cant appreciate) means that too much effort is directed here and not enough on the fun of the game; which when all said and done is surely the point??


Mr Snrub

25,763 posts

248 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
skeeterm5 said:
For me this is the wrong question.

The question should be which has the best gameplay with good graphics. I am convinced that the insatiable drive for better graphics (which most people cant appreciate) means that too much effort is directed here and not enough on the fun of the game; which when all said and done is surely the point??
A lot of triple A games spend too much time with OTT Michael Bay style cutscenes whose composures could surely have been better spent elsewhere. The success of Minecraft, FNAF, Shovel Knight, Undertale etc have shown people are not just interest in pure graphical power.

vonuber

17,868 posts

186 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
Have graphics really improved much over Half Life 2, released 12 years ago?
On PC? Yes.


J4CKO

Original Poster:

45,559 posts

221 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
Mr Snrub said:
skeeterm5 said:
For me this is the wrong question.

The question should be which has the best gameplay with good graphics. I am convinced that the insatiable drive for better graphics (which most people cant appreciate) means that too much effort is directed here and not enough on the fun of the game; which when all said and done is surely the point??
A lot of triple A games spend too much time with OTT Michael Bay style cutscenes whose composures could surely have been better spent elsewhere. The success of Minecraft, FNAF, Shovel Knight, Undertale etc have shown people are not just interest in pure graphical power.
Yeah, I think Minecraft struck a chord for adults as it felt retro and with kids as it was so simplistic looking.

Still, interesting to see what can be done at the cutting edge, might get myself a new gaming machine but worried I might not use it, kind of preferred gaming when it wasn't everywhere, have several consoles, can play games on phones and tablets, it's a bit over facing.

born2bslow

1,674 posts

155 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
For pistonheads, Project Cars is eye candy of the highest order...with enough gpu power it will run in 4k, I think at one computer gaming show it was run on triple Titan X's. With the real time and real weather features it can be properly breathtaking.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

219 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
I think that rather than just upping polycounts, it's other stuff which is now adding to the overall feeling of immersion. Better environments with better physics, more destructable objects, bodies which don't just fade away as you watch, lighting effects, all of that sort of stuff.

130R

6,998 posts

227 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
It's not a game but if you want to impress someone show them the Showdown VR tech demo on the Oculus. It shows that with VR graphics aren't everything because it's definitely not the best in terms of outright graphics quality but the overall experience is amazing.

Squirrelofwoe

3,232 posts

197 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
CrutyRammers said:
I think that rather than just upping polycounts, it's other stuff which is now adding to the overall feeling of immersion. Better environments with better physics, more destructable objects, bodies which don't just fade away as you watch, lighting effects, all of that sort of stuff.
Yep totally agree with this. Having more stuff to interact with in a realistic manner, regardless of it's usefulness to the actual game, contributes more towards the feeling of being properly immersed than pin-sharp graphics in my opinion.

Benchmarks for me in that regard included Half-Life 2- having objects with pretty realistic physics properties in the game world, and the first Deus Ex game that let you interact with almost everything in the game, even to the point of picking up and throwing a basketball or hacking an ATM. My mind was blown away by this, having been used to games where pretty much everything except npcs, weapons, or open-able doors were simply fixed meshes.

That new Deus Ex screenshot on the previous page is pretty amazing though. Even just thinking of the hardware needed to run that level of resolution/detail at 60fps is making my wallet cry.

Squirrelofwoe

3,232 posts

197 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
It's a tough balance to strike unless you have very deep pockets. My personal preference has been to only spend top money on components that aren't going to go out-of-date so quick (I've had my RAM, power-supply, case etc for almost 8 years now).

I've then periodically updated my GPU & CPU (and motherboard as required) whilst selling off the parts they replace.

Doing this I've got away with spending around £500 (net spend after selling the prev components) every 18 months or so and this has been the sweet spot for me.

Crucially though I've stuck with a 24" 1080p screen, and my current system will still get 60+ fps at this level on new titles (FX-8350, R9 290, 8gb RAM).

The problem is, I want to make the step up to 28" and 1440p. Which means that this year's upgrade is going to need almost an entirely new system, along with the new monitor itself. And given that I've had almost 10 years out of my current monitor, I'm determined to go with exactly the one I want (28" IPS, G-Sync) on the basis that I should get another half-decade out of it at the very least.

So I'm going to be looking at £1,500+ for the system & monitor whilst recouping possibly £350(?) for my current system- and on top of that the clutch has just decided to go in one of my cars frown