RE: Venturi Fétish returns to Europe
RE: Venturi Fétish returns to Europe
Wednesday 16th March 2005

Venturi Fétish returns to Europe

Electric sports car production due to start in summer


Venturi's Fétish, the electric sports car, has returned to Monaco from the Los Angeles Motor Show for an official presentation at the 21st International Electric Vehicles Symposium (EVS21).

Rendezvous at the Grimaldi Forum and in the streets of Monaco from 2-6 April to discover and test drive the marque's first, high performance electric car.

Venturi owner Gildo Pallanca Pastor is optimistic that the production can start next summer. The Fétish is the first production electric sports car in automobile history. With a monocoque carbon chassis the vehicle weighs 750Kg without batteries, 1,100 Kg with batteries. It offers 350 km of autonomy and accelerates from 0-62 mph in under five seconds. Pastor wants to sell 25 cars a year at a price of 540,000 euros, including VAT (about £368,000).

www.venturi.fr

Author
Discussion

ultimasimon

Original Poster:

9,646 posts

280 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
Interesting and brave. At £368,000 its close to Enzo money for a car which has Lotus Exige performance.

As a rich boys toy I am sure it will impress non-motoring people in a pub conversation.

Electric cars should have been developed years ago but thanks to the oil giants, developers have been dissauded. This vehicle does nothing for the growth in electric vehicles, it just pushes them out of the reach of your average buyer IMO.

chris_crossley

1,164 posts

305 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
30K and your on a winner. 300k+ you can not be serious.

Come on lotus, you know you can do better. I'd would buy one just because of the fuel bill's. The range is about right for a work commute.

Pasthim

18,261 posts

256 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
Yes, I agree, it was all going well until the price. I just can't imagine who would spend such money on a small electric sportscar from a tiny manufacturer who most have never heard of. Nice looking though.

cgibson

1,223 posts

306 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
I take it that it will have a decent sound system through which you can play the roar of a loud V8!!

cdp

8,018 posts

276 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
But it does demonstrate electric power is viable. Now the price needs to come down.

dnb

3,330 posts

264 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
Hmmm, let's burn coal to make electricity to charge a battery to drive a car...

It might catch on

phase90

85 posts

296 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
There's plenty of coal to burn though...

or better yet, go nuclear.

dnb

3,330 posts

264 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
There's plenty of farm land to grow sugar beet to distil into fuel for mildly adjusted petrol engines too...

john75

5,303 posts

269 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
Venturi I think Mr Ratel was their competition director when they built the LM600 ?

ninjadave

2,101 posts

278 months

Wednesday 16th March 2005
quotequote all
Why are people still trying to make electric cars? I'm just hoping joe-public doesn't feel they're being green for driving them - just becuase inner city london would get a little cleaner (ok, a lot) if everybody used electric cars, the rest of the world would suffer more!!! Grrr!

And then somebody tries to make a sports car out of the technology!

When will the madness end???

Aero8

375 posts

306 months

Thursday 17th March 2005
quotequote all
I wondered what had happened to this car. I ALMOST ordered one about 2/3 years ago when it was first shown as a concept (even had the order form). But at that time it was seen as being an alternative Elise, probably with the Renault V6 engine and was due to be in production within a year.

So what went wrong???

>> Edited by Aero8 on Thursday 17th March 08:05

peter450

1,650 posts

255 months

Thursday 17th March 2005
quotequote all
one of the many many problems with electic power is the batteries they may be good for a few miles driving gently but drive that thing like a sports car an they'l likly be flat in 15 mins also the weight 750 without bats 1100 with thats 350kg the weight of 2 pretty heavy 4 pots until they find a power source that can pack in as much power as a tank of petrol it wont be replaced

ultimasimon

Original Poster:

9,646 posts

280 months

Thursday 17th March 2005
quotequote all
peter450 said:
one of the many many problems with electic power is the batteries they may be good for a few miles driving gently but drive that thing like a sports car an they'l likly be flat in 15 mins also the weight 750 without bats 1100 with thats 350kg the weight of 2 pretty heavy 4 pots until they find a power source that can pack in as much power as a tank of petrol it wont be replaced


You are absolutely correct. Siemens AG have been pioneering fuel-cell technology for the last ten years, and I think it will become a reality in the next ten years. Lead acid/gel batteries are not the way forward.

cdp

8,018 posts

276 months

Thursday 17th March 2005
quotequote all
But there are the options of tidal, wave, wind and nuclear. Look at the pace with which mobile phone batteries have advanced, they are expensive but mass production costs could bring them down.

Of course bio fuels are also a good option, I have done quite a few miles on biodiesel in the last year. According to the owner of the garage I buy the diesel from British Sugar have plans for a biopetrol plant - but only if the tax comes down. Which isn't likely as the high duties on fuel are only there to bring in money and not to help the environment.

ultimasimon

Original Poster:

9,646 posts

280 months

Thursday 17th March 2005
quotequote all
Battery technology has moved on vastly. However the technology is not green. Who recycles Mobile phone batteries these days? Most people just chuck them in the bin.

They end up getting thrown into land fill sites where their poisonous chemicals are fed straight into the water table, like Zinc carbon and zinc chloride, Alkaline manganese, Lithium manganese, and Nickel cadmium to name just a few. Defo not the way forward. They are also expensive to manufacture and the sites are also not green as they emmit lots more toxic chemicals into the atmosphere, even after passing through environmental filters. On a car, the battery packs can make up to half the weight of the car. This then requires more energy and power to move that weight so battery technology or energy storage has a long way to go.

If the respective governments had started to actively and agressively get their acts together ten years ago, we probably would be seeing technology in motion by now. As usual its still a pipe dream and one thats still in the control of the oil giants

LuS1fer

43,164 posts

267 months

Thursday 17th March 2005
quotequote all
Give it a few years and the top prestige brand in this market will be Flymo with a breathtaking debut of the Flymo Sweet Chariot which will be coming for to carry you home.

4WD

2,289 posts

253 months

Tuesday 30th August 2005
quotequote all
I think some of you are barking up the wrong tree.

The point of these vehicles is not the (lack of) green issue. It's that you can have a performance car which costs a couple of hundred a year to run, instead of multiple thosands of pounds for petrol. Plus they would be virtually maintainence free, cutting costs even further.

lightningghost

4,943 posts

271 months

Friday 2nd September 2005
quotequote all
Change the price and the stupid name and you're onto a winner!