Tubs vs Clinches... Which is better?
Tubs vs Clinches... Which is better?
Author
Discussion

BeirutTaxi

Original Poster:

6,635 posts

243 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
So which is best??!!

wink

snotrag

15,624 posts

240 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Neither. Tubeless. Do people still run tubes!?

Your Dad

2,279 posts

212 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
How long until:

Which is best - Ti, CrMo, Al, Carbon?

gazza285

11,113 posts

237 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
BeirutTaxi said:
So which is best??!!

wink
Depends what for.

Paddy Taff

62 posts

119 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Tubs are for racing, though their gains are marginal these days because of the quality of modern clinchers. Back in the day clinchers (Or wired ons before the yanks got in on the act) were heavy and lifeless with little grip.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

217 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
snotrag said:
Neither. Tubeless. Do people still run tubes!?
Yes.

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Your Dad said:
How long until:

Which is best - Ti, CrMo, Al, Carbon?
You forgot bamboo, bamboo is what all the experienced riders eventually use. You'd know this if you were as good or experienced as me.

gazza285

11,113 posts

237 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Tubs are for cyclocross, far superior to the alternatives.

Except for the Three Peaks Cyclocross...

JustinF

6,795 posts

232 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
Your Dad said:
How long until:

Which is best - Ti, CrMo, Al, Carbon?
the answer is wood, but I'm torn between Elm and Beech.

JustinF

6,795 posts

232 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
Paddy Taff said:
Tubs are for racing, though their gains are marginal these days because of the quality of modern clinchers. Back in the day clinchers (Or wired ons before the yanks got in on the act) were heavy and lifeless with little grip.
Clincher wheels are also significantly heavier.
That aside, anyone who rides tubs and isn't racing is a bit of a twunt.

gazza285

11,113 posts

237 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
JustinF said:
Paddy Taff said:
Tubs are for racing, though their gains are marginal these days because of the quality of modern clinchers. Back in the day clinchers (Or wired ons before the yanks got in on the act) were heavy and lifeless with little grip.
Clincher wheels are also significantly heavier.
That aside, anyone who rides tubs and isn't racing is a bit of a twunt.
Thanks. Two of my road bikes have tubs on, both are over thirty years old though.

Matt_N

9,032 posts

231 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
JustinF said:
Clincher wheels are also significantly heavier.
That aside, anyone who rides tubs and isn't racing is a bit of a twunt.
Strange opinion.

Quite a few guys I ride with use tubulars, it's their preference and I can't see how it makes them a twunt.

IroningMan

10,598 posts

275 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
Matt_N said:
JustinF said:
Clincher wheels are also significantly heavier.
That aside, anyone who rides tubs and isn't racing is a bit of a twunt.
Strange opinion.

Quite a few guys I ride with use tubulars, it's their preference and I can't see how it makes them a twunt.
I have one pair of tubular wheels - ten years ago, if you wanted deep-section rims then tubulars were about all that was on offer unless you were prepared to take out a second mortgage.

I don't get the love for tubeless.

gazza285

11,113 posts

237 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
IroningMan said:
I don't get the love for tubeless.
They do make sense for mountain bikes, allowing for lower pressures to be used with less chance of punctures, and lighter as well.

HardtopManual

2,904 posts

195 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
Road bike? Tubs for carbon, clincher for aluminium.

I just can't trust a (rim-braked) clincher on a carbon rim on a long descent.

ALawson

8,054 posts

280 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
I have been running tubeless for a year now, apart from one noticeable puncture which sealed and a sidewall failure (sorted out with a tube) I have had no issues in 6k km. The sidewall failed tyre was replaced foc by the supplier.

You can run lower pressures and they simply ride better IMHO, previously used GP4ks for similar annual milage with only 2 punctures.

Obviously I have spotted some sealant on the seat tube but it seals so quickly you hardly notice.

mcelliott

10,471 posts

210 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
Well I ride tubs through the summer - love them - on a Campag Chorus equipped bike, so I'm well screwed biggrin

okgo

42,085 posts

227 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
HardtopManual said:
Road bike? Tubs for carbon, clincher for aluminium.

I just can't trust a (rim-braked) clincher on a carbon rim on a long descent.
Learn to ride properly and you'll be ok.

I like my tubs, but probably wouldn't bother if I had my time again, roads are just a bit aggressive to use nice tyres (which is most of the benefit) round me for racing, so end up using hard tubs which feel a bit average.

HardtopManual

2,904 posts

195 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
okgo said:
Learn to ride properly and you'll be ok.

I like my tubs, but probably wouldn't bother if I had my time again, roads are just a bit aggressive to use nice tyres (which is most of the benefit) round me for racing, so end up using hard tubs which feel a bit average.
Thanks for the tip, I'll take my stabilisers off next time I'm doing an 11:30 descent of the Giau.

I'll take my Boras with tubs. I've seen a carbon clincher rim fail with my own eyes. Luckily, at a fairly low speed. I don't personally think the ease of changing tyres is worth the risk if you regularly ride in the mountains.

Steve vRS

5,391 posts

270 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
Punctures? Or is sealant that good now?

Appreciate that they are useful for CX though.